Creationist child abusers close doors

PostmodernProphet said:
lol....he's no libertarian.....he's a liberal-tarian.....but, above everything else he's a tried and true modernist.....I suspect he dreams in capital letters.......
Click to expand...

He's no libertarian because such an animal doesn't exist. As I've said on another thread, if you subtract the anachists and extremists who come from both ends of the political spectrum, there is nothing left to claim as a libertarian agenda.

I still haven't determined what his motive really is but I'm trying. I suspect nothing more than contrariness for some personal reason in his past life. An interesting study especially when he loses control and spews his profanity and hate toward others with whom he doesn't agree.
 
For the most part I would have been comfortable with a libertarian candidate......I balked when Ron Paul said it was a mistake for the US to get involved in WW2, though......I wondered what would have happened if another Hitler had shown up during his presidency.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
For the most part I would have been comfortable with a libertarian candidate......I balked when Ron Paul said it was a mistake for the US to get involved in WW2, though......I wondered what would have happened if another Hitler had shown up during his presidency.......
Click to expand...

First of all you should understand that Ron Paul would say anything that would get him the support of the fringe who were unhappy with both the Dems and the Repubs. It's a cheap stunt which usually doesn't work at least until the fringe becomes the mainstream and that's not close to happening. He could lock up about 15% of the vote but never any more than that. The same fate awaits Rand Paul where he can find enough support on his state level with all the lowlife and haters but he'll never be a real threat nationally.

Libertarianism is completely off-the-wall extremism and that's not going to ever change. Ignore it and let them be happy with their 10% to 15%. It's the same problem that marginalizes Baxter here on this forum.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol.....so its in error but we aren't allowed to examine and correct those errors?.......we used to think Obamacare was a good thing, we cannot change it because we used to think it was good.......
Click to expand...

Of course not. You don't get to tweak revelations or claims in a way that fundamentally changes their intent when your only support for the accuracy of the claims is some nonsense about supernatural powers. You have diminished your credibility unless you are claiming to be a new prophet. What you are doing is similar to the tards who claim Nostradamus was uncannily accurate and you are doing what is known as retrofitting.

Obamacare has no relevance since it was/is not supported with arguments from revelation. You are reaching ditzy deuce.
 
monty1 said:
There's no doubt that's true. Baxter wants to cling to interpretations that just don't work while you are more intent on finding interpretations that do work. I think it's a part of his libertarian mindset that also doesn't work and can't work.




Obviously the 21st. century has proven the old interpretations wrong in so many ways. Good for you for looking deeper.



That works for me but of course nothing is going to work for Baxter, and you shouldn't worry about ever convincing him of anything. Being a libertarian, fiction, contrariness, and dogma are his very soul.
Click to expand...

I don't need to salvage the faith, retrofit it or reinterpet it. I can just write it off as wrong as it obviously is.

Again, pmp has completely sidestepped the fact that his "new and imaginative" interpretation does not fit. He evades the criticism I have leveled concerning it's lack of continuity with the passages that follow it. If there was no earth then how did God part gather the waters to allow land to appear.

You are nothing but a fool, who is being played.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
lol....he's no libertarian.....he's a liberal-tarian.....but, above everything else he's a tried and true modernist.....I suspect he dreams in capital letters.......
Click to expand...

Yeah, coward... Try to change the subject from the fact that your Bible is nonsense as is your reinterpretation of it.

But , you won't support this nonsense either.
 
Professor Baxter said:
I don't need to salvage the faith, retrofit it or reinterpet it. I can just write it off as wrong as it obviously is.

Again, pmp has completely sidestepped the fact that his "new and imaginative" interpretation does not fit. He evades the criticism I have leveled concerning it's lack of continuity with the passages that follow it. If there was no earth then how did God part gather the waters to allow land to appear.

You are nothing but a fool, who is being played.
Click to expand...

Nobody here on this forum is smart enough to play me but it's obvious that PMP has you relying on a religious argument now. You're as much as quoting passages to rebut his claims. But in any case, what's your motive when you know you can't accomplish anything with him and the forum for the most part sees you as an extremist. That's excepting the fucking crazies of course who are becoming your only allies.
 
monty1 said:
He's no libertarian because such an animal doesn't exist. As I've said on another thread, if you subtract the anachists and extremists who come from both ends of the political spectrum, there is nothing left to claim as a libertarian agenda.

I still haven't determined what his motive really is but I'm trying. I suspect nothing more than contrariness for some personal reason in his past life. An interesting study especially when he loses control and spews his profanity and hate toward others with whom he doesn't agree.
Click to expand...

The two little empty headed trolls have completely abandoned the discussion for weak ad homs.
 
monty1 said:
Nobody here on this forum is smart enough to play me but it's obvious that PMP has you relying on a religious argument now. You're as much as quoting passages to rebut his claims. But in any case, what's your motive when you know you can't accomplish anything with him and the forum for the most part sees you as an extremist. That's excepting the fucking crazies of course who are becoming your only allies.
Click to expand...

He has you relying on it, fool. You are cheering his attempt to prove that HIS religion is uncannily accurate by retrofitting it to the modern understanding of cosmology. It does not work and it might for a naive fool, such as you, but anyone with any familiarity with such tricks it is very weak. I have referenced the historical record of how science was made subordinate to the biblical passages and how it was understood. I have also pointed out how his retrofitting does not fit with the passages that follow. He has failed to respond and instead joined you in ad homs. You are both pathetic.

His Bible is uncannily accurate like Sylvia Browne or a tarot card reading.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Pointing out that you are dodging is not an ad hom, idiot. And neither is calling you an idiot.
Click to expand...

Such anger Baxter! But anyway, sooner or later you will clue in to the fact that I've been playing with you and you will stfu before you make a bigger fool of yourself.

Or maybe not. Maybe you're good for a few more days yet?
 
monty1 said:
Such anger Baxter! But anyway, sooner or later you will clue in to the fact that I've been playing with you and you will stfu before you make a bigger fool of yourself.

Or maybe not. Maybe you're good for a few more days yet?
Click to expand...

Fuck off, peanut. I labeled you a troll a long time ago.

You have made yourself pmps fool. You probably think he accepts evolutionary theory too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top