Creationist child abusers close doors

PostmodernProphet said:
no......they aren't.......your assumptions link them together.....assumptions which cannot be proven scientifically......

the fact that a creature with nostrils in a certain location had teeth is not proof of transition between a creature that had teeth and a creature that had nostrils......its merely proof that there was a creature with nostrils in a certain location that had teeth.....
Click to expand...

They are proof of transition in the line. There is NO alternative explanation for them and you have offered none.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Because the covenant was that he would not bring another flood destroying the earth. If the "earth" really only meant a small part of the world then localized floods would break the covenant.

You see it or you are far more stupid than I thought. You are just pretending you don't see it. That is, you are lying.
Click to expand...

no I have to be honest.....not only don't I "see it", I think the argument is incredibly disingenuous.....now, if he had actually destroyed the earth afterwords or killed every living human, now THAT would have broken the covenant.......
 
Professor Baxter said:
No, I stated that you must mean the furthest removed even though you stated it incorrectly. I can quote where I said that for you if you want to continue lying about it.

You deny evolution. You put on a show of accepting it just like you pretend not to see the problem with the covenant and localized floods.
Click to expand...

you believe I stated it incorrectly......you believe I deny evolution.......you believe the covenant is broken......you believe lots of silly unproven things.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
no I have to be honest.....not only don't I "see it", I think the argument is incredibly disingenuous.....now, if he had actually destroyed the earth afterwords or killed every living human, now THAT would have broken the covenant.......
Click to expand...

More doubletalk.

The covenant was that he would never flood the entire world again, indicating that the flood was supposed to be worldwide.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
???....Baxter's Theory of Evolution and Refrigerator Maintenance isn't proven by fossils......
Click to expand...

You reject THE theory of evolution. You have failed to even suggest where anything I have stated disagrees with what is the commonly accepted theory of evolution in the scientific community. Times up, you lose.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
you believe I stated it incorrectly......you believe I deny evolution.......you believe the covenant is broken......you believe lots of silly unproven things.....
Click to expand...

You stated it incorrectly. Our ultimate ancestors or last ancestors are our parents or from a species homos sapiens. You meant what is our first ancestor. You seriously need to finish grade school.
 
Professor Baxter said:
I was not arguing any such thing, liar. The story indicates that it WAS a worldwide flood and so the only things that were supposedly alive of the "flesh" that walks the earth came off the ark. What I actually said, was that the covenant covers all future generations, as it clearly states. So the absurdity that it the story was meant to indicate a localized flood causes continuity problems with the covenant as we have had localized floods. It also causes problems of continuity for the preaching of Christ.
Click to expand...

But that was in Noah's world and maybe it was worded that way; because otherwise the people of that time would have trouble understanding the concept, kind of like you're having a problem understanding it in this day and age.
(PMP - Please quote me; because the coward, Baxter, is afraid of the truth)
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
But that was in Noah's world and maybe it was worded that way; because otherwise the people of that time would have trouble understanding the concept, kind of like you're having a problem understanding it in this day and age.
(PMP - Please quote me; because the coward, Baxter, is afraid of the truth)
Click to expand...

kk.....though I doubt people at the time had any trouble understanding it......since they were all descendants of Noah, you know.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top