Creationist child abusers close doors

PostmodernProphet said:
kk.....though I doubt people at the time had any trouble understanding it......since they were all descendants of Noah, you know.....
Click to expand...

According to you when the bible says God flooded the earth it means the part of the world Noah might be familiar with and when in the same passage he says he will never flood the earth again it means the entire earth. It is not possible to more disingenuous than you clowns. Lol...
 
Professor Baxter said:
According to you when the bible says God flooded the earth it means the part of the world Noah might be familiar with and when in the same passage he says he will never flood the earth again it means the entire earth. It is not possible to more disingenuous than you clowns. Lol...
Click to expand...

scenario A......all people in one location......scenario B......people everywhere........would more have to be flooded in scenario B than in scenario A?......it takes someone disingenuous to figure out the answer, I guess......
 
I wish you would get back to laying out humanity's evolutionary path for me.....after we left bioslime, what was our next stop......did we ever pass mold or do we take more of a plankton route?......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
yes, I expect most of them were anyway......
Click to expand...

And all the animals. It says several times that that flood was worldwide and killed all animals or all flesh that walked the earth.

You are just lying through your teeth. There is no reason to believe the flood was intended to be local. If one is going to take those sort of liberties in changing what it clearly states then there is really no reason to believe it at all and you could much more credibly treat it as completely allegorical. But a more honest approach does not let you continue the vague absurdity that this had any impact on the fossil record which it could not have if it were local.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
to point out that part of the Baxter Theory of Evolution is not backed up by scientific evidence.......
Click to expand...

Well, then you failed again. That part of THE evolutionary theory is backed by scientific evidence that I have cited.

Again, tell us about this alternative theory of evolution that does not include common descent? What scientist promotes it? What papers have been done explaining it? It does not exist.
 
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet said:
scenario A......all people in one location......scenario B......people everywhere........would more have to be flooded in scenario B than in scenario A?......it takes someone disingenuous to figure out the answer, I guess......
Click to expand...

It takes someone disingenuous to come up with the answer you want.

It does not say he flooded just the locations inhabited by humans. It makes it clear that it was worldwide and that it killed all animals that walked the earth.

this is not just a matter of interpretation of one or two words. You are altering what was clearly intended and repeated multiple times. But whatever.... you say it was local having no impact on the fossil record or this discussion and the Bible is a meaningless fairy tale that can be read to mean whatever one wants. Fine.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I wish you would get back to laying out humanity's evolutionary path for me.....after we left bioslime, what was our next stop......did we ever pass mold or do we take more of a plankton route?......
Click to expand...

I already answered you on this. If you can't move it forward then there is no reason to repeat it.

I wish you would START laying out this theory of evolution that does not include common descent. Has anybody ever done so? You claim it is the more common theory yet you have no references.

I wish you would explain to us how the earth is flat, the center of the solar system/univers, 6000 years old and explain all the other nonsense you and Ken Ham ACTUALLY believe. Because its clear you DON'T accept the theory of evolution.
 
Last edited:
Professor Baxter said:
Again, tell us about this alternative theory of evolution that does not include common descent?
Click to expand...

it isn't an alternative theory, its the only theory.......creatures adapt to their environment......evidence is available for example, that a certain type of bird that spread around both sides of a large lake had evolved by the time they met again on the far side.......that is scientific evidence of the only theory of evolution......
 
Professor Baxter said:
I wish you would explain to us how the earth is flat, the center of the solar system/univers, 6000 years old and explain all the other nonsense you and Ken Ham ACTUALLY believe. Because its clear you DON'T accept the theory of evolution.
Click to expand...

but I don't believe the earth is the center of the universe, is 6000 years old....why would I try to explain gibberish to you......
 
Professor Baxter said:
I already answered you on this.
Click to expand...

no....you have told me that man's most distant ancestor is bioslime.....you have not told me what bioslime evolved into which is part of the path to man......you have simply stated that it is absurd to think mold is on that pathway.......apparently you believe fossils prove this......I am still waiting for the promised scientific evidence......
 
Professor Baxter said:
I already answered you on this. If you can't move it forward then there is no reason to repeat it.

I wish you would START laying out this theory of evolution that does not include common descent. Has anybody ever done so? You claim it is the more common theory yet you have no references.

I wish you would explain to us how the earth is flat, the center of the solar system/univers, 6000 years old and explain all the other nonsense you and Ken Ham ACTUALLY believe. Because its clear you DON'T accept the theory of evolution.
Click to expand...

I wish you would explain how big you think Noah's world was. :chesh:
 
PostmodernProphet said:
???...why would the flood have had an impact on the fossil record......most of the fossils would have been fossils long before a flood......
Click to expand...

Ask your fellow Ham and the idiots at the school that gave the test. It's not necessary that you prove yourself a liar to concede but I aceept your concession anyway, loser.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top