Creationist child abusers close doors

PostmodernProphet said:
do you have scientific evidence demonstrating the evolution of any porokaryote (which as I pointed out before, the wiki article called bioslime) into an eukaryote?........
Click to expand...

Do you have any source showing a theory that does not include common descent? No, as I said the clock has ran out on that, loser.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
your claim includes things not supported by scientific evidence.......so far only in the issue of evolution from prokaryotes to eukaryotes......I'm sure there will be more but you haven't told us the next stage yet.....
Click to expand...

It is supported by scientific evidence.

I have told you the next stage, now you are asking for a third. You have not told us the first stage yet. Almost a thousand posts and you have failed to offer any hint of this working theory of evolution that excludes common descent.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
100% of the scientific proof of evolution excludes common descent......
Click to expand...

No, again there is proof. Enough that it is not seriously doubted and you have lost the point with your inability to note a theory of evolution that excludes it.

You are a complete failure. You don't get math, science, have a poor vocabulary and don't know a thing about the Bible. I bet you are as ignorant as ditzy on history too.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I don't remember any nonsense, no.....
Click to expand...

Sure you do the stuff you now concede is bullshit about all cats descending from one feline. If the flood was local then all of that nonsense is unnecessary. You did not have to call God a liar but if that's what you want to believe....
 
Professor Baxter said:
Okay what is the post number?
Click to expand...

I'm also too lazy to page up......I stated as an example the scientific study done on some type of warbler I believe it was that spread around both sides of a huge lake and by the time the two groups converged again on the far side of the lake they had both evolved to the point where they could not interbreed.......its one of the very few scientific proofs of evolution.....
 
Professor Baxter said:
Sure you do the stuff you now concede is bullshit about all cats descending from one feline. If the flood was local then all of that nonsense is unnecessary. You did not have to call God a liar but if that's what you want to believe....
Click to expand...

I see nothing there that is bullshit......perfectly logical.....unlike the shit happening approach.....if he did it once why could he not do it again.....and again.....and again.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I'm also too lazy to page up......I stated as an example the scientific study done on some type of warbler I believe it was that spread around both sides of a huge lake and by the time the two groups converged again on the far side of the lake they had both evolved to the point where they could not interbreed.......its one of the very few scientific proofs of evolution.....
Click to expand...

I asked for a theory that excludes common descent. You have not found one.
 
Professor Baxter said:
It's all bullshit. If the flood did not cover the world then what is the point?
Click to expand...

The shit happened is your approach. But you call shit a miracle or an act of God. Your shit happens answer is how you get "everything" to direct questions about what specifically was created. You demand exquisite and exact detail for every step in the the evolutionary line with undenibale proofs for each step and offer NO proof or detail. Then you call your belief backed by nothing at all and the theory of evolution for which there may be some small doubt on details in the lineage, faith beliefs. Your math is bad. A position backed by nothing but the whoppers you tell and a position backed by tons of evidence are not equivalents. You believe in a fairy tale. I accept scientifically proven facts.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top