Creationist child abusers close doors

Professor Baxter said:
So God created dinosaurs and humans at the same time? Boy that is a pretty stupid theory.
Click to expand...
obviously its a stupid theory....why do you believe it?......I certainly have not said it.....

What came after eukaryotes you ask? Everything, except prokaryotes.
Click to expand...

so stage one is prokaryotes, stage two is eukaryotes, and stage three is everything else?.......does that mean that dinosaurs and humans evolved at the same time?....../grins?.......Boy that is a pretty stupid theory.
 
Last edited:
PostmodernProphet said:
sure I have.....the theory of evolution as proven by scientific examination.......
Click to expand...

You have not. There is no theory of evolution that excludes common descent. It is not a point that is debated or doubted by any serious scientist in the filed. Your example does not even address the point.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
punishing human disobedience.....a better question would be, "what is the point of flooding places where there were no disobedient humans?".....
Click to expand...

It unequivocally states he wanted to kill all flesh (animals) that walk the earth. It also clearly states that he would never repeat it and again there have been local floods.

I am asking you what is the point in the context of your silly ideas on cat kind? It's just a stupid story that you don't believe is accurately depicted and I believe is mere myth.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
obviously its a stupid theory....why do you believe it?......I certainly have not said it.....



so stage one is prokaryotes, stage two is eukaryotes, and stage three is everything else?.......does that mean that dinosaurs and humans evolved at the same time?....../grins?.......Boy that is a pretty stupid theory.
Click to expand...

I asked you for the first step. He created what? Prokaryotes? Dinosaurs? Humans?

Why should I be required to present more detail than you. The details have been stated and restated, but you offer nothing but your shit happens religion.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
obviously not....I believe shit was intended and caused.....
Click to expand...

PostmodernProphet said:
you realize that is an essential difference between admitting something is an act of faith and claiming it is science, right?......
Click to expand...

PostmodernProphet said:
then why is it so difficult to provide just a tiny bit of evidence supporting the evolution of prokaryotes into eukaryotes?.......I mean, if you can't get from stage one to stage two how do you expect to get to stage 2,675,000?......
Click to expand...

PostmodernProphet said:
is this a minimalist admission that there may be some doubt, however small, about your "scientifically proven facts"?......
Click to expand...

Four post you need to clip and take my comments out of context?

I know when you mess your pants you pretend that you were not the cause, but you are. Your religion is shit happens.

Yes, when YOU believe in something without any proof and not based in reason you are acting on faith. When there is lots of proof and/or it backed by reason it is not faith and may be said to be supported by science or logically derived. That is the difference.

There is no doubt of common descent or evolution. It is a proven fact. You are asking for something else, i.e., an exact mapping of the tree of life.

You can't even offer the first detail about your silly fairy tale. It's all shit happens or supernatural shit happens or God did some shit. That is the extent of the theory as you have presented. Go pray to your shitty god and stfu about science or how your crappy religion disproves science or calls it in to doubt.
 
Professor Baxter said:
I am asking you what is the point in the context of your silly ideas on cat kind?
Click to expand...

the context of my "silly ideas on cat kind" was to respond to an even more silly claim that there wouldn't have been room for all the animals on the ark.......I simply pointed out we didn't need all the animals on the ark because of the scientific fact of evolution........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
right....that's what it was all about......killing all flesh......forgot that part......lol.....
Click to expand...

Apparently you did. If the only importance is allegorical then it is really stupid for you to argue that it was local. You are trying to cherry pick again, using it for what aids your argument and ignore what causes problems.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
the context of my "silly ideas on cat kind" was to respond to an even more silly claim that there wouldn't have been room for all the animals on the ark.......I simply pointed out we didn't need all the animals on the ark because of the scientific fact of evolution........
Click to expand...

You do need all animals with evolution or you need the flood to have happened (at least) 25 million years ago. You don't believe in evolution. You believe God made some shit happen in the womb. That's not evolution. It is fairy tale bullshit.
 
Professor Baxter said:
Apparently you did. If the only importance is allegorical then it is really stupid for you to argue that it was local. You are trying to cherry pick again, using it for what aids your argument and ignore what causes problems.
Click to expand...

/grins....that was supposed to be sarcasm.....did you think it really WAS about killing all flesh instead of punishing humanity?.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top