Deathcare Preview: Babies sentenced to death by the NHS

Stargazer said:
They starve them to death.

Now sick babies go on death pathway: Doctor's haunting testimony reveals how children are put on end-of-life plan

  • Practice of withdrawing food and fluid by tube being used on young patients
  • Doctor admits starving and dehydrating ten babies to death in neonatal unit
  • Liverpool Care Pathway subject of independent inquiry ordered by ministers
  • Investigation, including child patients, will look at whether cash payments to hospitals to hit death pathway targets have influenced doctors' decisions
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...als-children-end-life-plan.html#ixzz2DntLI08w
Click to expand...

if they are going to do this sort of thing, would not an overdose of some narcotic be better than this

we have a strong need to examine end of life practices and euthanasia regardless of the age of the 'patient'

i have a living will directive as there are circumstances where i would not care to continue to live, especially on 'life support' trapped in a dying body and in pain or non compos mentis
 
bravo said:
Two of Apples posts, one after the other.....ironic ?.....

Sarcasticly points out how medical care may prolong your life in one breath and in the next champions the living will to pull his plug to avoid using valuable
resources to prolong his life as selfishness....

Notes the very reason we have a growing population of geriatric seniors that nature should have taken long ago but for the liberal insistence that they be forced into medical care that in thousands of cases they aren't even aware of .....living vegetables in their nineties.....
Click to expand...

Did you watch 60 Minutes last night? The authorities are investigating hospital admission policies.
 
Don Quixote said:
if they are going to do this sort of thing, would not an overdose of some narcotic be better than this

we have a strong need to examine end of life practices and euthanasia regardless of the age of the 'patient'

i have a living will directive as there are circumstances where i would not care to continue to live, especially on 'life support' trapped in a dying body and in pain or non compos mentis
Click to expand...

Reasonable and rational people agree with you. We need to change this to make it humane. We euthanize our pets and often treat them with more compassion than we do people.
 
Haiku said:
There's no way he's from England, no way. He's lying. He is all American I'm sorry to say.
Click to expand...
From Huddersfield to be exact, int best bastard county int land, Yorkshire.
"Yorkshire is my greatest work" said The Lord!
"Compared to Yorkshire everywhere else is just Shiite"!!!!

English!
Bulldog!
Yorkshire!

Go on weep with envy!
 
Aoxomoxoa said:
You are probably right, I suspect it is another of Legion's many personas.
Click to expand...
Wrong fool!!

A superior English than you, shandy supping southern poof!!

On ilkley moor bar't at!!
Tha knows!!

It must add so much to your misery, not being from Yorkshire!
 
apple0154 said:
Obviously it depends on the severity of the disorder. Take spina bifida, for example, caused be the incomplete closing of the embryonic neural tube. I worked for a company that employed a receptionist who had that disorder and she was one "hot" gal!

Then we have anencephaly which is also caused by the incomplete closing of the neural tube.

230px-Anencephaly_front.jpg

I guess you would support doing all we can to prolong the life of that baby.
Click to expand...

Sorry you cannot use anencephaly, as there is no chance for life outside the womb, and the baby if delivered would not live long enough to starve to death, trust me I know my daughter had it thanks for the friggin graphic picture to bring back painful memories.
 
apple0154 said:
And I reiterate:

Obviously it depends on the severity of the disorder. Take spina bifida, for example, caused be the incomplete closing of the embryonic neural tube. I worked for a company that employed a receptionist who had that disorder and she was one "hot" gal!

Then we have anencephaly which is also caused by the incomplete closing of the neural tube.

230px-Anencephaly_front.jpg



I guess you would support doing all we can to prolong the life of that baby.

(Excerpt) In the 1960s, children with disabilities at Willowbrook were intentionally given hepatitis as medical experiments, and by the 1970s, they were subject to unimaginable neglect and abuse. In 1972, a then-29-year-old Geraldo Rivera performed an undercover news investigation of Willowbrook that awoke our nation, showing how the institution housed 5,000 children and teens in a facility for 2,000, in unimaginably repugnant conditions. He showed how residents were neglected, treated literally as caged animals in some cases. He showed proof of ramped physical and sexual abuse by staff members. And, he showed how some of the residence, placed there as infants by scared or coerced parents, had absolutely no reason to be there – that is, they were children with misunderstood disabilities that didn’t effect their cognitive skills in any way.

And, in 1987, Willowbrook closed its doors permanently.

Here we are some 21 years (2008) after the last doors of Willowbrook shut, and while literal facilities like it no longer exist – Gothic, echoing institutions now replaced by contemporary “centers,” “homes,” and “schools” – the children still do exist, only in a new generation. Across this nation, children with disabilities remain “institutionalized,” tucked away from society, where we know that neglect and abuse remains, as with the ongoing reports on Texas’ state “schools” for the disabled, where incidents have been most notably flooding out of its Denton facility, to the sum of 10 deaths and 60 questionable injuries of residence in the last nine months alone…… From Willowbrook to Denton, the locations and generations change; however, unspeakable crimes against our society’s most vulnerable – children with disabilities – remain.(End)
The sordid tale continues at http://powerchairdiaries.com/2008/08/20/echoes-of-willowbrook/

Yes, the “right to life” includes the right to injuries and death. And maybe a little sexual abuse and medical experimentation to round it out. With full knowledge there are reprobates who insist the fetus develop to term and go directly into hell without passing “Go”.

Read the article. Educate yourself. While your motives may be above board you have absolutely no idea what happens to genetically defective children. From the moment of birth to their untimely death, whether in a hospital or long term facility, each and every day is a day in Hell.

With the internet and available knowledge there is no reason for anyone not to know. If in doubt visit the places. Check out the hospitals that specialize in severely defective children. Unless you see and hear what can only be described as torture, the insistence of prolonging their agony at any and all costs, you’ll never understand. Then ask yourself if the emergence of a poet or a mountain climber or a comedian justifies preventing the suffering of thousands.
Click to expand...

And who gets to determine the severity of their condition or are you saying that none of the people listed weren't that severe?
 
patriot66 said:
Sorry you cannot use anencephaly, as there is no chance for life outside the womb, and the baby if delivered would not live long enough to starve to death, trust me I know my daughter had it thanks for the friggin graphic picture to bring back painful memories.
Click to expand...

Sorry, Patriot. No harm was intended. :(
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
And who gets to determine the severity of their condition or are you saying that none of the people listed weren't that severe?
Click to expand...

To be honest I just scanned your list. In many cases the severity can be determined by tests, ultrasound, MRI, etc. After consultation with a doctor or doctors it should be left up to the woman to decide if she wants to take the chance her baby may live a life of hell.

One more thing. While we may hear about the extraordinary accomplishments do we know what they go through every day? And what of the ones who don't want to keep living? Do they have the option of euthanasia? Do we have the right to condemn them to a life of hell even when we know beyond any doubt?
 
apple0154 said:
To be honest I just scanned your list. In many cases the severity can be determined by tests, ultrasound, MRI, etc. After consultation with a doctor or doctors it should be left up to the woman to decide if she wants to take the chance her baby may live a life of hell.

One more thing. While we may hear about the extraordinary accomplishments do we know what they go through every day? And what of the ones who don't want to keep living? Do they have the option of euthanasia? Do we have the right to condemn them to a life of hell even when we know beyond any doubt?
Click to expand...

You "scanned" the list and yet you continued to argue your point, ignoring outside information that doesn't support your agenda.

And then; in your usual spin cycle, you would have supported the death of those individuals and the loss of their contributions to society.
You're a dumb fuck and I knew it was a waste of time to get an honest answer out of you.
It won't happen again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top