W
WinterBorn
Guest
It was also integral to the two western societies we built our nation on; Greece and Rome.
Indeed, but SM will probably claim homosexuality is the reason those civilizations fell.
It was also integral to the two western societies we built our nation on; Greece and Rome.
Sorry to interrupt the gay conversation but I just came across the following.
OK. Apple's here. Let's see where I wrote "a person shouldn't have to work for anything nor ever be worried about their own personal safety".
Doubtless. It was, and still is, viewed as the ultimate strength of Sparta though. They had a near universal bisexual style of life and DEMANDED homosexual activity in their military.Indeed, but SM will probably claim homosexuality is the reason those civilizations fell.
Indeed, but SM will probably claim homosexuality is the reason those civilizations fell.
LOL You're such a dummy. It's used here as an adjective, not a noun. Society has an interest in obtaining the benefits of traditional marriage for itself, that of having men and women in stable relationships, bearing children and cultivating them to be stable citizens and eventually more stable families with more children, and so on.Definition of VESTED
1: fully and unconditionally guaranteed as a legal right, benefit, or privilege
2: having a vest
More evasive bullcrap...explain how this shows EXACTLY HOW traditional marriage benefits a society.
You mean the ones that rejected homosexuality so they could prosper?It was also integral to the two western societies we built our nation on; Greece and Rome.
Behind the curve Tom, I beat ya to it.It was integral to Sparta as well, I'm sure that in his own mind he considers himself to be a modern Spartan.
http://sexandhistory.blogspot.com/2008/06/sparta-experiment-in-state-fostered.html
Really? Because when they rejected it, they fell. Rome adopted Christianity and fell not long after. Greece fell after losing their ideals as well.You mean the ones that rejected homosexuality so they could prosper?![]()
LOL You're such a dummy. It's used here as an adjective, not a noun. Society has an interest in obtaining the benefits of traditional marriage for itself, that of having men and women in stable relationships, bearing children and cultivating them to be stable citizens and eventually more stable families with more children, and so on.
No. I have a degree in applied science. And you? You didn't graduate college.
Your logic here escapes me. You seem to be be saying that bad shit has happened to society, so lets give it more bad shit.
Applied sciences are skilled trades and engineering, and metallurgy/metallography.Applied science? What the hell is that? Home economics? I attended U of H for 2 years. Eventually got my certification with NBRC, as a cardiopulmonary tech, which no doubt, is on par with a degree in "applied science". LOL.
LOL You're such a dummy. It's used here as an adjective, not a noun. Society has an interest in obtaining the benefits of traditional marriage for itself, that of having men and women in stable relationships, bearing children and cultivating them to be stable citizens and eventually more stable families with more children, and so on.
LOL Show me the study. LOL
So says your version of history, but they both seem to be in existence today, and if not for liberalism, would be doing quite well.Really? Because when they rejected it, they fell. Rome adopted Christianity and fell not long after. Greece fell after losing their ideals as well.
I like the definition of the adjective just fine, which is how I 'splained it to you. Do you know the difference between an adjective and a noun? Or do you have to look that up too?Don't like the definition?
Take it up with Merriam Webster.
In other words, you never graduated college. Nice.Applied science? What the hell is that? Home economics? I attended U of H for 2 years. Eventually got my certification with NBRC, as a cardiopulmonary tech, which no doubt, is on par with a degree in "applied science". LOL.
Where is the Roman empire? You mean Italy? I really hope you don't because that'd be one of the funniest and most inaccurate things you've ever said, and trust me, that's a difficult standard to reach. As far as Greece, they didn't emerge again until their rebellion during the Crimean war, about 150 years ago.So says your version of history, but they both seem to be in existence today, and if not for liberalism, would be doing quite well.
Again, you'll just reject the source.As soon as you provide links for your claims.