Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
By attacking traditional marriage.
HOW does it attack a traditional marriage? HOW does it make it weaker?
By attacking traditional marriage.
It changes the traditional definition.
No....I do not think I am who you think I am.So where have you been for the last 30 years? We've had the biggest wealth redistribution to the top since the Gilded age and maybe even bigger. You supported 2 unfunded wars, a failed 'trickle down' theory and deregulation that led to a near disastrous economic meltdown. The tab has been running for 30 yrs and now it's time to pay.
HOW does it attack a traditional marriage? HOW does it make it weaker?
I know it'd ruin my marriage.So a straight couple is so fundamentally WEAK, that a change in the mere definition of a WORD will make them weaker? Are you suggesting that straight couples are THAT pathetic? That a definition can hurt them?
You want a libertarian, no tax no govt involvement utopia? go to Somalia the only true libertarian utopia on earth. Otherwise taxes are the price for a civilized society. Ahhh... I forget, the right no longer believes in society.
Because the state has a compelling interest to recognize traditional marriage, since it is the backbone of the family, which is the backbone of a civil society.
I know it'd ruin my marriage.
Divorce is what weakens marriage.
Divorce is what weakens marriage.
That said, I know how to strengthen marriage.....
If your straight marriage doesn't work out, you are forced into a gay marriage. There is no divorce any more. Done.
See how easy that was to solve.![]()
In other words, you overstepped again and don't have the balls to admit you fucked up.
Just curious is all. One of each would be sufficent. And TRY to avoid derogatory remarks boys and girls.
Brilliant!
The audience Monday night’s CNN Tea Party Express Republican primary debate was eager to see the death of a hypothetical man who was in a coma and also did not have health care insurance.
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer posed this question to Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul: “A healthy young, 30-year-old man has a good job, makes a good living but decides, ‘You know what? I’m not going to spend $200 or $300 a month on health insurance because I’m healthy, I don’t need it.’ But something terrible happens, all the sudden he needs it. What’s going to happen if he goes into a coma? Who pays for that?”
“What he should do is whatever he wants to do,” Paul replied. “That’s what freedom is all about, taking your own risks. This whole idea that you have to prepare to take care of everybody…”
“Are you saying society should just let him die?” Blitzer asked.
The audience responded with shouts of “Yes!”
Please ban Alias, this post changing is really stupid!
Nope. Just celebrated 25 blissful years, and looking forward to the next 25.SM just got really really excited and went and broke up with his wife. He now eagerly awaits being 'forced' into the relationship he has so longed for.
Except it doesn't prohibit them from the benefits that he claims.What are you talking about? He is correct on this issue. By prohibiting gay couples from attaining the tool (marriage license) that provides the benefits, it most certainly is our laws that prohibit them.
Your argument is that guns cause gun violence?the state also has a compelling interest to reduce gun violence, therefore by your position, gun bans should be constitutional.
what is it that you see wrong about freedom of choice?