Define a 'Liberal' or a 'Conservative'

[Cancel 2016.2]

You want evidence? I give you, again, 5000 years of civilization. When has one survived without strong families bearing their own children?

Which again does NOTHING to prove that gay couples who marry would not also strengthen society. You also ignore that homosexual behavior has also been a part of society for those 5000 years of civilization. Yet perhaps you can tell us at what point during those 5000 years was it that homophobes became prevalent. Hmmmmm... I wonder if it might coincide with the advent of Christianity?

 

[DamnYankee]

Really? Then why do you engage in them?
And once again, you don't know what you're talking about. Try backing up your "assertions" with stats.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1556756
Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against male children is approximately 2:1,

Studies show that gays are 1-3% of the population yet responsible for 20-40% of pedophilia. You can't spin that.

 

[Cancel 2016.2]

All I see here is your whining and hissing because you can't get your way.

Get my way? I am asking you to explain HOW it is that gay marriage would weaken straight marriage. You state the government has to PROTECT traditional marriage. That implies a threat, what is the threat traditional marriage has to be defended from? Can you answer that?

 

[DamnYankee]

An authority, as opposed to taking your word for it????????????????????????????????????????LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Bitch, you are riot.

As opposed to logic and reason. Stop tonguing your boyfriend during discussions with me, please.

 

[DamnYankee]

Normal is subjective, you POS.

Not according to statistics, you nincompoop. *shrug*

 

[DamnYankee]

Originally Posted by DamnYankee
It can be. As a scientist, I prefer to use the statistical definition.

LOL. We're supposed to believe that you, a conservatard of the 1st degree, believes in science, when the ideology you support, generally scoffs at it???????????????????????????????? LOLOLOLOLOLOL. You! A scientist?????????????????? Right. And I'm an astronaut.

No. I have a degree in applied science. And you? You didn't graduate college.

 

[poet]

You want evidence? I give you, again, 5000 years of civilization. When has one survived without strong families bearing their own children?

What a moron. In 5000 years of civilization, how many have gone to war and lost family members, yet, still managed to survive and thrive?
A traditional family, is more and more "a myth". Families come in many forms.

 

[DamnYankee]

Really? Post #52...well, there's post #52 directly below...sure don't see you explaining anywhere HOW traditional marriage benefits a society...




When you plan on getting around to finally show everyone EXACTLY HOW traditional marriage benefits a society? You keep claiming you have...but for some reason you can't show anyone exactly WHERE you did so.

Look up the definition of vested.

 

[DamnYankee]

Which again does NOTHING to prove that gay couples who marry would not also strengthen society. You also ignore that homosexual behavior has also been a part of society for those 5000 years of civilization. Yet perhaps you can tell us at what point during those 5000 years was it that homophobes became prevalent. Hmmmmm... I wonder if it might coincide with the advent of Christianity?

Again, if you want to change society fundamentally it is up to you to prove the benefit, not me to prove otherwise.

 

[poet]

Studies show that gays are 1-3% of the population yet responsible for 20-40% of pedophilia. You can't spin that.

Lies. Gays make up 10-20% of the population, at least. And where are your statistics citing your ridiculous claim? Link challenged?

 

[DamnYankee]

Get my way? I am asking you to explain HOW it is that gay marriage would weaken straight marriage. You state the government has to PROTECT traditional marriage. That implies a threat, what is the threat traditional marriage has to be defended from? Can you answer that?

What is the benefit? Can you answer that?

 

[DamnYankee]

What a moron. In 5000 years of civilization, how many have gone to war and lost family members, yet, still managed to survive and thrive?
A traditional family, is more and more "a myth". Families come in many forms.

Your logic here escapes me. You seem to be be saying that bad shit has happened to society, so lets give it more bad shit.

 

[poet]

As opposed to logic and reason. Stop tonguing your boyfriend during discussions with me, please.

When stumped for a logical or reasonable answer you distract, deflect and demean. LOL= laugh out loud, having nothing to do with salacious acts.

 

[zappasguitar]

Look up the definition of vested.

Definition of VESTED

1: fully and unconditionally guaranteed as a legal right, benefit, or privilege


2: having a vest


More evasive bullcrap...explain how this shows EXACTLY HOW traditional marriage benefits a society.

 

[WinterBorn]

You want evidence? I give you, again, 5000 years of civilization. When has one survived without strong families bearing their own children?

Thats sounds very good. But what civilization has survived period? So you could, in fact, make the same claim in reverse. Since virtually every civilization from 5,000 years ago up to 500 years ago has failed, and since most of them had strong families bearing their own children, doesn't that show the failure of that institution?

And the "bearing their own children" is a nice touch but essentially meaningless.

 

[poet]

Not according to statistics, you nincompoop. *shrug*

What statistics? You never provide evidence. Why is that?

 

[DamnYankee]

Lies. Gays make up 10-20% of the population, at least.

LOL Show me the study. LOL

 

[DamnYankee]

What statistics? You never provide evidence. Why is that?

The science of statistics, nincompoop.

 

[WinterBorn]

Your logic here escapes me. You seem to be be saying that bad shit has happened to society, so lets give it more bad shit.

What has escaped you is the ability to answer a very simple question. You are the one wanting to exclude gays from the benefits of marriage, and yet you offer no reason why they should be excluded.

 

[/MSG/]

Which again does NOTHING to prove that gay couples who marry would not also strengthen society. You also ignore that homosexual behavior has also been a part of society for those 5000 years of civilization. Yet perhaps you can tell us at what point during those 5000 years was it that homophobes became prevalent. Hmmmmm... I wonder if it might coincide with the advent of Christianity?

It was also integral to the two western societies we built our nation on; Greece and Rome.