Democrats, do you wantguns banned, or do you just want regulation, and assault bans?

Do Democrats want guns banned, or do they just want regulation, and assault bans?

  • All guns should be banned

    Votes: 1 16.7%

  • Assault weponary should be banned, purcases should be regulated.

    Votes: 5 83.3%
  • Total voters
    6
Nordberg said:
They had a guard. An armed guard. A guy who trained as a guard and was an ex cop. Not exactly a gun free zone, was it?
Click to expand...

In the sense of the meaning behind gun free zone, yes.

Are you saying less would have been killed has the guard not had a gun?
 
Nordberg said:
We would all live safer and less stressfully, if all guns were banned. However we know that is not going to happen. We can end semi automatics, bump stocks and large clips immediately. That would be a great first step. Then have the semis in circulation be turned in at cost. This is not about the second amendment. It is about the welfare of the people. That is in the preamble, which precedes the 2nd amendment. We all live more chaotically because of the NRA and gun nuts. Does your crazy idea of a second amendment right mean we have to live in a shooting gallery? I don'[t think so.
Click to expand...

Yeah, how well did it work in Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia when the populace was disarmed? but you being an anti-American Communist want total government control over our lives, Bolshevik piece of shit.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
yes, the liberal utopia of no guns would NEVER result in a world of the strong taking advantage of the weak........

how many american lives are you willing to spend in order to achieve your objective?
Click to expand...

Still and immature belligerent aren't you. You with a gun should be designated terrorism. Don't make up dumb shit about a liberal utopia. I will not respond to your brain farts.
 
Jade Dragon said:
On top of gun regulations, we should probably try, and get news outlets to stop glorifying the monsters acts. You hear the shooters name hundreds if not thousands of times, but how many victims names get mentioned?
Click to expand...

I think we should go even further. Random spot checks of students phones, emails, notebooks, etc. Need to know what they're up to and who they're up to it with.
 
Nordberg said:
Still and immature belligerent aren't you. You with a gun should be designated terrorism. Don't make up dumb shit about a liberal utopia. I will not respond to your brain farts.
Click to expand...

awwww, do you need your safe space again? look, don't get upset because I fill your bullshit position with holes that would rival the titanic. just accept that your shit is fucked up and wrong.
 
CFM said:
In the sense of the meaning behind gun free zone, yes.

Are you saying less would have been killed has the guard not had a gun?
Click to expand...

Stop talking for me. I will tell you what I think. You make a stupid statement and ascribe it to who you are discussing ,instead of yourself. In other words, you are terrible at discussions.

Guards have guns and are supposed to protect the kids. How did that work out ? but guns were there. Problem is the bad guy had a gun and was not afraid to use it.
 
One of the biggest weapons that lefties have is incremental change. They do want to ban all guns as much as they wish to overturn the presidential election, but they know better than to attempt such a thing. They do not even know or care which gun is used the most in mass shootings, but they will capitalize on such tragedy to chip away at a less used weapon. The idea is to ban one type of gun, and then start working on banning more. Incremental change is hard to see, but it can be very effective.
 
And Evmetro is officially that biased, jaded, and dumb, that he voted in this. I said it was open people. That way we get a real answer, that isn't just what the right wants to hear. Discount the vote of the gun supporting republican, trying to answer for democrats. Since he doesn't get what's wrong here, no one bother, and just ignore him, as he blabs away. In addition maybe Democrats should upload a pic of guns, you or the family might own, just for good measure.
 
Shallon Peterson said:
I almost would like to see them banned,just to see the gun nuts cry.
Click to expand...

Well if they keep rolling doing something down the road, you can guarantee that what will be done will be far more strict than if they'd wise up now, and satiate with the bare minimum needed. Just fair warning out their gun maggots. When people get this passionate, it happens in droves. The voter will decide.
 
Jade Dragon said:
Well if they keep rolling doing something down the road, you can guarantee that what will be done will be far more strict than if they'd wise up now, and satiate with the bare minimum needed. Just fair warning out their gun maggots. When people get this passionate, it happens in droves. The voter will decide.
Click to expand...

You keep calling us maggots, will you be leading the charge? Just keep in mind, we are just as passionate about keeping our Constitutional rights.
 
Nordberg said:
Stop talking for me. I will tell you what I think. You make a stupid statement and ascribe it to who you are discussing ,instead of yourself. In other words, you are terrible at discussions.

Guards have guns and are supposed to protect the kids. How did that work out ? but guns were there. Problem is the bad guy had a gun and was not afraid to use it.
Click to expand...

You don't think. That's your problem.

Problem is you don't understand the concept of a gun free zone. You likely think deadbolts keep thieves from robbing houses.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top