democrats don't understand what fascism is

[Lao Tse]

Nah, you ran away from the thread because I kicked your ass and Damocles couldn't provide you with any cover.

You whined and bitched about the number of my responses, but you never actually challenged them.

You just insisted you were smart and then you very cowardly ran away from the thread.

AS it stands, I made several points that you completely avoided because JPP lets you do that.

so when will you explain how it's smart to send all the jobs away with globalism?

is being a "consumer society" really a sustainable plan?

isn't there a downside to massive trade imbalance?

be honest for once.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Says the inverted-brained simian that doesn't know where Sweden is.

Got those degrees of latitude figures yet , addlepate ?


Haw, haw..................................haw.

Herr Comrade, what is your point? That knowing the latitude and longitude of Sweden is the mark of educational achievement?

A rather strange way of rating others.

 

[LV426]

so when will you explain how it's smart to send all the jobs away with globalism?

They aren't being sent away...unemployment is at a 60 year low and there are more open positions than workers to fill them.

 

[LV426]

is being a "consumer society" really a sustainable plan?.

Yes. Sure is.

What's not quite as "sustainable" is the environment.

So shit like this, that capitalists give us, is unsustainable:

 

[Uncensored2008]

You don't seem to have any problems with subjective statements when they link fascism to socialism.

Wikipedia is extremely biased and utterly unreliable.

When I went to Cal Poly, WikiPedia hadn't been invented, in fact Algore the Magnificent hadn't invented the internet yet. In Graduate school, all sources were required to be peer reviewed - hence Wikis of any sort were irrelevant.

What is it that makes Fascism "right wing?"

Because it's collectivist?

Because the state controls the means of production?

Because individualism is suppressed in favor of the group - the Reich?

Because the State is deemed supreme and never to be questioned?

 

[Trumpet]

Wikipedia is extremely biased and utterly unreliable.

When I went to Cal Poly, WikiPedia hadn't been invented, in fact Algore the Magnificent hadn't invented the internet yet. In Graduate school, all sources were required to be peer reviewed - hence Wikis of any sort were irrelevant.

What is it that makes Fascism "right wing?"

Because it's collectivist?

Because the state controls the means of production?

Because individualism is suppressed in favor of the group - the Reich?

Because the State is deemed supreme and never to be questioned?

Thank you for your off the wall reply.

 

[Uncensored2008]

False authority fallacy. Wikipedia defines no word except 'Wikipedia'.

Fascism is not conservatism.
Fascism is not capitalism.
Fascism is not patriotism.
Fascism is not military.
Fascism is a form of socialism. It is what Democrats WANT.

DEMOCRATS want censorship.
DEMOCRATS want a centralized autocracy.
DEMOCRATS are elitists.
DEMOCRATS are the ones that use children and the poor as pawns.
DEMOCRATS want dictatorship.
DEMOCRATS want the military to attack the citizens.
DEMOCRATS are racists and bigots.
DEMOCRATS are authoritarian.

You are describing Democrat tyranny.

Well said.

And irrefutable.

 

[Uncensored2008]

OK, I agree...the idea that 51% would kill the other 49% is stupid and dumb, and a distraction from the fact that you opened your big mouth and shit poured out of it.

Yet history shows just that, repeatedly.

Those who fail to learn from history, vote democrat.

 

[Trumpet]

Yet history shows just that, repeatedly.

Those who fail to learn from history, vote democrat.

What circus are you with??????

 

[LV426]

Yet history shows just that, repeatedly.

Where does it show that?

What democracy resulted in 51% of the people killing the other 49%?

Now watch as you say any answer "is irrelevant"...

 

[LV426]

Those who fail to learn from history, vote democrat.

When has there ever been a democracy where 51% of the people voted to kill the other 49%?

Nowhere, of course, because you just made it up to make a flailing point in an argument you should have avoided entirely.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You said that they would kill the minority...why did you say that if you didn't think it was true?

Could sploogy, could. I'm fairly precise with my use of language.

But when we look at the track record of those like you...

Hitler - socialist - murdered 14 million

Lenin - socialist - murdered 3 million (he died early after the Bolsheviks seized power)

Stalin - socialist - murdered 43 million

Mao - socialist - murdered 75 million

Ho - Socialist - murdered 4 million

Pol Pot - socialist - murdered 2 million

I mean - it's like those of your ilk follow a pattern...

Also...True or False, prior to 1837, every single vote in the House and Senate was done along majority lines.

Every single vote in the house is still based on majority - moron.

answered last week

 

[archives]

Fascism is not a form of government. It is a type of socialism. No matter how many times you try to redefine it, you are still just trying to redefine it. It is government manipulation of markets. That's a defined economic ideaology.
Both Hitler and Mussolini are both socialists. They are both fascists. So is Biden and the Democrats.

Mussolini did not cut taxes or curb spending.
Hitler abolished the labor unions because he wanted the government to be the labor union. You should look up the meaning of the 'NAZI' acrnonym sometime. He did not privatize the banks. Germany was using fiat currency at the time. To support the Third Reich, Hitler stole wealth from those he conquered.

And you are still wrong, I think you’ve struck out on this tread by now. Fascism is a form of government, a form of government just like every other form of government, borrows from both capitalism and socialism in forming an economic system.

To blankly claim Fascism is socialism is as absurd, it would be like saying all democracies are automatically capitalist

 

[archives]

Could sploogy.

But when we look at the track record of those like you...

Hitler - socialist - murdered 14 million

Lenin - socialist - murdered 3 million (he died early after the Bolsheviks seized power)

Stalin - socialist - murdered 43 million

Mao - socialist - murdered 75 million

Ho - Socialist - murdered 4 million

Pol Pot - socialist - murdered 2 million

I mean - it's like those of your ilk follow a pattern...




Every single vote in the house is still based on majority - moron.

answered last week

Here is another one confusing forms of government and economic systems

 

[LV426]

Could sploogy.

LMAO!

So it's "could" now, when before you told me to "look at history" and see it myself.

So once again, you opened your big, fat, stupid mouth and put your tiny foot into it because you're a goddamned fucking moron.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You've known exactly who I am this entire time because you ran away from my responses on the other thread.

ROFL

You suffer from delusions of relevance, little drone.

So you've been trying to avoid me this whole time, and only now are you responding because you realized just how big, fat, and stupid your mouth is.

Avoid you?

Despite the moronic shit you post being utterly irrelevant, I continue to grant you the courtesy of responding.

You really are not entirely sane, are you?

 

[LV426]

But when we look at the track record of those like you

None of those were democracies where 51% killed the other 49% like you said would happen and has happened...only you can't seem to show where that has ever happened.

Instead, you just run back to authoritarians who have more of your dogma than mine.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The only good Nazi is a dead Nazi, wouldn't you agree?

I have no desire to kill democrats - merely keep Nazis like you from power.

Now which party is the one who nominates Nazis? Oh right, yours:

Neo-Nazi Arthur Jones wins Republican nomination for Illinois congressional seat
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/21/neo...ination-for-illinois-congressional-seat-.html

Wins NOMINATION

You are such a fucking clown.

Now, learn to respond to posts in context - that means stop your lying little game of separating posts into out of context tidbits - you lying little shit.

 

[Uncensored2008]

None of those were democracies where 51% killed the other 49% like you said would happen and has happened...only you can't seem to show where that has ever happened.

Instead, you just run back to authoritarians who have more of your dogma than mine.

That isn't what I posted - fucktard.

Learn some integrity - you lying pile of shit.

 

[LV426]

Every single vote in the house is still based on majority

So what about the Senate, then? Until 1837, was every Senate vote majority vote?

So this idea of minority rule is...where in the Constitution?

Where in the Constitution did the Founding Fathers say that majority vote doesn't rule?