democrats don't understand what fascism is

You ran away from the thread where you first posted that imaginary and childish conversation.

The reason wasn't because of anything I did, it was because you couldn't debate in good faith.

Because you're a loser.


Sure I did, bitchboi...
 
Apparently the Jews still had guns.

Especially those dangerous jerks who were veterans of The Great War... Those jerks went and put their lives on the line and had guns because of it... Then when they passed these laws they went and gave them the guns because they were loyal and law abiding... then they moved them to Ghettos... Then, finally, they began just moving them out of sight so they could do what they wanted to them...

The Nazi gun laws were specific by race, and yes, Hitler absolutely considered Jews a race, it was not ethnic jews he was after and it was not "white on white" violence.

Another interesting gun law: The farmers in Germany all had to have a rifle ready so that if paratroopers landed they could be taken prisoner by the farmers... if the farmers missed them while they were slowly floating towards the ground that is.
 
You're a fucking coward who posted an imaginary conversation and then sought out every single excuse to not defend it.


You are an irrelevant little troll, but I am beginning to remember you. Basically you post like a two year old, never offering anything of substance, just whining "NUHN UHN" and spewing vitriol.

Typical leftist moron.


Notice that you've posted not a single word that is on topic in this thread. You can't, you're an ignorant fool with zero knowledge.

I don't mind insults, but occasionally you need to post substance. It appears you never do. Just an emotional child throwing a tantrum, still butt hurt that I tired of your childish nonsense and ignored you.
 
socialism is not love. It's portrayed as love, but it's not. Socialism is the equal sharing of misery and poverty, except for the elected 'leaders' who impose it. they get all that concentrated wealth.

View attachment 24473

Providing free healthcare is an act of love
Likewise providing free education
Also, the establishment of a minimum wage, health conditions in the workplace, holiday pay, maternity leave, free weekends, old age pensions - and many other civilized rules that we take for granted.
I don't see how any sicko capitalists can make their fortunes out of any of those.
 
we can call the union of state and corporate power something else, if you guys want.

crony capitalism is pretty good.

totalitarianism is not the same thing as that.
 
it's a real quote. garbage face.

"Fascism should rightly be called corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power." ― Benito Mussolini

just face that you people are actually the bigger fascists. and totalitarian on top of that.

:truestory:

This is a bit like believing that a democratic republic is really a totalitarian socialistic dictatorship because East Germany said they were a Democratic Republic (it was in their name). While they (the fascists) did create syndicates and some portions of the members of the syndicates were "leaders of the industry", the syndicates were run and owned by the government and no privately held stock was bought or sold. The production was controlled by the government through these syndicates. This is only "corporatism" in that each syndicate was a government controlled entity that was called "corporate". Calling something "corporate" doesn't make it a corporation any more than East Germany wasn't a totalitarian socialist dictatorship because they called it a Democratic Republic.
 
This is a bit like believing that a democratic republic is really a totalitarian socialistic dictatorship because East Germany said they were a Democratic Republic (it was in their name). While they (the fascists) did create syndicates and some portions of the members of the syndicates were "leaders of the industry", the syndicates were run and owned by the government and no privately held stock was bought or sold. The production was controlled by the government through these syndicates. This is only "corporatism" in that each syndicate was a government controlled entity that was called "corporate". Calling something "corporate" doesn't make it a corporation any more than East Germany wasn't a totalitarian socialist dictatorship because they called it a Democratic Republic.

im talking about now.

his definition is still useful.

what do you want to call it when pfizer dictates government policy?
 
Why would the 51% decide to kill the other 49%?

Irrelevant.

Under the DUHMOBCRACY morons like you demand, the majority can do any fucking thing they please.

See, retards like you always imagine they are the majority - and if the majority can silence dissent by the minority - then you will rule.

But because you are really quite stupid, you fail to grasp that your perception is not necessarily reality, and that majority is transitory.

Lets say that you were granted your wish, and that you could kill anyone who voted for Donald Trump or spoke against the democrat Reich.

Once that enemy was dead, you would need a new enemy a new scapegoat. Eventually, those like you end up victim to the very dictatorship you fight to establish.


Or are you accidentally revealing why YOU shouldn't be put in charge of anything?

Not sure why you keep opening your mouth here when you have a ton of responses on the other thread to sort through.

I understand, you're getting your ass handed to you and have no way to provide valid response here.

Oh, and learn to used the backquotes, moron.
 
im talking about now.

his definition is still useful.

what do you want to call it when pfizer dictates government policy?

I would call that corporatism, maybe an oligarchy, but not fascism. In fascism the government controlled what they would put out, say, how much they pay people, and it was the government that set the policy, not the companies. The companies did not control the government, the government controlled the companies through the syndicates which Benito called "corporate".
 
Say stupid fuck, did we establish that there is judicial review prior to a case being calendared?

:BKick::BKick::BKick:


You really are dumb as dogshit, but far less pleasant to be around.

No, we established with absolute certainy that it does not. I guess you CAN'T read a fucking chart. Who'da thunk?

You bath in dogshit? Explains a lot.
 
Back
Top