NiftyNiblick
1960s Chick Magnet
Are you saying that the States have the right to make "incendiary" speech illegal and punishable?
Milquetoast Macaw is clueless. Does he still have the bird? I have him on ignore so I can't see it.
Are you saying that the States have the right to make "incendiary" speech illegal and punishable?
Milquetoast Macaw is clueless. Does he still have the bird? I have him on ignore so I can't see it.
Yes, I supplied several quotes and links to back that up.
Is that right?
Yes.
What makes you say so?
I gave you links.
Thats what makes me say so.
Untrue. State and local laws forbid murder, regardless of who it is against.
What makes you say so?
You are arguing against yourself. You are now locked in paradox. You are being irrational.
What about those that don't believe in the Theory of Creation?
Still lock in paradox...
No court nor any government can take away the right of self defense.
A constitution does not define rights for anyone. You are still locked in paradox.
You are still locked in paradox. Which is it, dude?
"With most the votes counted & Trump way ahead, Democrat states stopped counting until they "found" truckloads of only Biden ballots in the middle of the night, only in precincts notorious for Democrat voter fraud, only exactly where Democrats needed them to show up, doing a 180 to the results, exploding vote totals way past 100%."
This moronic "signature" by Arminius may be one of the most stupid on the entire internet.
Go to bed before Michigan counts Detroit,
Wisconsin counts Milwaukee,
and Georgia counts Atlanta.
Then kill yourself for being too fucking stupid to understand why Biden took the lead.
We're talking about the .177" trumpanzee brain diameter, not the somewhat larger fava bean sized ones.
then just who, exactly, do you think the US Constitution applies to?
Yelling fire in a theater would be an example of "incendiary" speech.
Correct. The government cannot limit the First Amendment free speech.
You've already answered my question just now. The government cannot restrict free speech.
Yes, I supplied several quotes and links to back that up.