Democrats exist to undermine and violate the Constitution

Arminius said:

When the Federal Government is restrained from doing something by the Bill of Rights...that is a protection of U.S. citizens.
That protection is not extended to foreigners, who are subject to the jurisdiction of OTHER countries. The 2nd Amendment does not protect a Canadian's gun rights.
Click to expand...

Still lock in paradox. You are being irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.

Which is it, dude? You are still arguing that it's legal to shoot a Canadian and deny that Canadian his rights to defend himself.

Rights do not come from a piece of paper. Rights do not come from 'protection'.
 
Arminius said:


Step 1: Canadian officials seize a Canadian citizen's guns, violating their gun rights.

Step 2: Canadian citizen sues, claiming their 2nd Amendment rights have been violated.

Step 3: Canadian officials point out that Canadians are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction, and thus cannot possibly HAVE 2nd Amendment protections.

Step 4: Case gets laughed out of court.

Constitutional protections cannot logically apply to foreigners. They obviously only apply to American citizens...who are the only people over which the U.S. has jurisdiction. The semantics about where the rights come from in the first place is wholly irrelevant to this.
Click to expand...

No court nor any government can take away the right of self defense. You are still locked in paradox. Which is it, dude?
 
"With most the votes counted & Trump way ahead, Democrat states stopped counting until they "found" truckloads of only Biden ballots in the middle of the night, only in precincts notorious for Democrat voter fraud, only exactly where Democrats needed them to show up, doing a 180 to the results, exploding vote totals way past 100%."

This moronic "signature" by Arminius may be one of the most stupid on the entire internet.

Go to bed before Michigan counts Detroit,
Wisconsin counts Milwaukee,
and Georgia counts Atlanta.

Then kill yourself for being too fucking stupid to understand why Biden took the lead.
We're talking about the .177" trumpanzee brain diameter, not the somewhat larger fava bean sized ones.
 
Arminius said:


Totally wrong. If the Constitution goes out of its way to clarify that even people BORN in the U.S. are not automatically subject to U.S. jurisdiction, then obviously, just happening to be LOCATED in the U.S. AT THE MOMENT in no way makes them subject to its jurisdiction. Which parts of the Constitution clarify that is completely irrelevant to its status as a legal fact.
Click to expand...

A constitution does not define rights for anyone. You are still locked in paradox.
 
Arminius said:
There appears to be semantic confusion here. Rights come from our Creator, constitutional protections OF those rights come from the U.S. government, whose protections of those universal human rights can naturally only apply to Americans, as everyone else is subject to ANOTHER COUNTRY'S jurisdiction.
Click to expand...

Still locked in paradox. Which is it, dude?
 
"... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
 
Arminius said:
Side note:

Do un-vetted terror state "refugees" inside our country have 2nd Amendment rights that the Federal Government cannot interfere with? Or are foreigners held to different legal standards for obvious reasons?

When we capture mass murderers and terrorists on the battlefield, do they have to be each given a lawyer, processed in a domestic criminal court of law as if they stole a bike, or are they treated differently (as enemy combatants captured on a battlefield) because they are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction?

The logistical absurdities alone should clarify that constitutional protections were never intended or authorized to be anything other than a safeguard of U.S. states and citizens against the Federal Government...and that state and federal laws regarding foreigners is all that dictates how they are to be treated.
Click to expand...

Rights do not come from a piece of paper. Rights do not come from 'protections'. You are still locked in paradox.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
"With most the votes counted & Trump way ahead, Democrat states stopped counting until they "found" truckloads of only Biden ballots in the middle of the night, only in precincts notorious for Democrat voter fraud, only exactly where Democrats needed them to show up, doing a 180 to the results, exploding vote totals way past 100%."

This moronic "signature" by Arminius may be one of the most stupid on the entire internet.

Go to bed before Michigan counts Detroit,
Wisconsin counts Milwaukee,
and Georgia counts Atlanta.

Then kill yourself for being too fucking stupid to understand why Biden took the lead.
We're talking about the .177" trumpanzee brain diameter, not the somewhat larger fava bean sized ones.
Click to expand...

Denial of probability math. Denial of public record. Denial of affidavits. Denial of history.
 
AProudLefty said:
Are you saying that the States have the right to make "incendiary" speech illegal and punishable?
Click to expand...

Define 'incendiary' speech. I am referring to a specific phrase. Also, go read State constitutions. No government has any 'right' of any speech. It has only the powers and authorities specifically given to them by a constitution.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top