Democrats humiliated by reality some more as Trump predictions come true

If I remember correctly, a GOP house interrogated Clinton about 4 years ago for a couple of days, and came-up with nothing

You remember INCORRECTLY. :nono:

1) Hillary "Bleachbit and Hammers" Clinton destroys evidence under subpoena, silences witnesses, stonewalls, and obstructs justice in every conceivable way EVERY SINGLE TIME she is caught doing something criminal. She then says, well you don't have enough evidence to convict [because I destroyed it while dragging this whole thing out for more than a year] and your investigation is now old, so this was just another 'vast right-wing conspiracy."

Same playbook, literally every single time. :bs:

2) The problem with this? Each time, actual evidence establishing that she did in fact commit the crime DOES emerge, as when Comey identified more than a hundred separate felonies and federal crimes of hers in the speech in which he announced nothing would be done about it.

comey mueller obstruction.jpg

That's not "coming up with nothing," dishonest demagogue. It's called Democrat privilege. And you don't get to use Democrat privilege to argue that the crime did not occur.

200.webp


And for the record on Chinagate...

“The FBI uncovered evidence about the alleged plan, in part, through electronic intercepts. . . . The plan, first discussed in early 1995, called for Chinese officials to channel more than $2 million into U.S. campaigns.”

China Was Bill Clinton’s Russia

 


You remember INCORRECTLY. :nono:

1) Hillary "Bleachbit and Hammers" Clinton destroys evidence under subpoena, silences witnesses, stonewalls, and obstructs justice in every conceivable way EVERY SINGLE TIME she is caught doing something criminal. She then says, well you don't have enough evidence to convict [because I destroyed it while dragging this whole thing out for more than a year] and your investigation is now old, so this was just another 'vast right-wing conspiracy."

Same playbook, literally every single time. :bs:

2) The problem with this? Each time, actual evidence establishing that she did in fact commit the crime DOES emerge, as when Comey identified more than a hundred separate felonies and federal crimes of hers in the speech in which he announced nothing would be done about it.

View attachment 15908

That's not "coming up with nothing," dishonest demagogue. It's called Democrat privilege. And you don't get to use Democrat privilege to argue that the crime did not occur.

200.webp


And for the record on Chinagate...

“The FBI uncovered evidence about the alleged plan, in part, through electronic intercepts. . . . The plan, first discussed in early 1995, called for Chinese officials to channel more than $2 million into U.S. campaigns.”

China Was Bill Clinton’s Russia


OMG, you're still intoxicated on Clorox
 
If I remember correctly, a GOP house interrogated Clinton about 4 years ago for a couple of days, and came-up with nothing, and also, under Trump's corrupt dept. of Justice, Clinton was again investigated, and that investigation came to a dead end. So where's the Beef??????????????

It wasn't for this. This occurred in 1996 back when Bill Clinton was President. Hillary was grilled about things like the Benghazi debacle of the Obama administration and its subsequent botched attempt to cover it up.
 
It wasn't for this. This occurred in 1996 back when Bill Clinton was President. Hillary was grilled about things like the Benghazi debacle of the Obama administration and its subsequent botched attempt to cover it up.

Remember the slogan, "LOCK HER UP," it seems that Trump and his corrupt Dept of Justice have done everything possible to make this happen, so why would they have overlooked this, if it was credible???? Also remember the uranium mine scandal, and all the noise that a GOP house made with that, which turned into nothing.
 
Remember the slogan, "LOCK HER UP," it seems that Trump and his corrupt Dept of Justice

The DOJ that Obama weaponized for partisan gain has been literally caught lying to a federal judge, doctoring evidence, and illegally spying to frame Trump and falsely exonerate Hillary, to rig and steal the presidency. That's OBAMA corrupting the DOJ (like he did every other part of the Federal Government), dumb-ass, not President Trump. It is asinine lunatic extremism to suggest that President Trump finally getting justice after being framed and his associates getting falsely prosecuted is the introduction of corruption, rather than the removal of it.

:bs:

...have done everything possible to make this happen, so why would they have overlooked this, if it was credible????

thumbnail.jpg

Repeating this already debunked fallacy won't make it less debunked. :nono:

Again, Hillary "Bleachbit and Hammers" Clinton destroys evidence under subpoena, silences witnesses, stonewalls, and obstructs justice in every conceivable way EVERY SINGLE TIME she is caught doing something criminal. She then says, well you don't have enough evidence to convict [because I destroyed it while dragging this whole thing out for more than a year] and your investigation is now old, so this was just another 'vast right-wing conspiracy."

Same playbook, literally every single time. :bs:

The problem with this? Each time, actual evidence establishing that she did in fact commit the crime DOES emerge, as when Comey identified more than a hundred separate felonies and federal crimes of hers in the speech in which he announced nothing would be done about it.

comey mueller obstruction.jpg

That's not "overlooking" anything, dishonest demagogue. It's called Democrat privilege. And you don't get to use Democrat privilege to argue that the crime did not occur.

Also remember the uranium mine scandal, and all the noise that a GOP house made with that, which turned into nothing.

Same as your other two attempts to use this fallacy. Evidence WAS produced showing that she committed crimes with Uranium One. Democrats (especially Hillary) just don't get prosecuted. Again, you don't get to use Democrat privilege as proof that the crime did not occur.

content bs.jpg
 


You remember INCORRECTLY. :nono:

1) Hillary "Bleachbit and Hammers" Clinton destroys evidence under subpoena, silences witnesses, stonewalls, and obstructs justice in every conceivable way EVERY SINGLE TIME she is caught doing something criminal. She then says, well you don't have enough evidence to convict [because I destroyed it while dragging this whole thing out for more than a year] and your investigation is now old, so this was just another 'vast right-wing conspiracy."

Same playbook, literally every single time. :bs:

2) The problem with this? Each time, actual evidence establishing that she did in fact commit the crime DOES emerge, as when Comey identified more than a hundred separate felonies and federal crimes of hers in the speech in which he announced nothing would be done about it.

View attachment 15908

That's not "coming up with nothing," dishonest demagogue. It's called Democrat privilege. And you don't get to use Democrat privilege to argue that the crime did not occur.

200.webp


And for the record on Chinagate...

“The FBI uncovered evidence about the alleged plan, in part, through electronic intercepts. . . . The plan, first discussed in early 1995, called for Chinese officials to channel more than $2 million into U.S. campaigns.”

China Was Bill Clinton’s Russia


Still crying like a baby about Hillary with fake stories. You have no shame. Do you know Hillary was 4 years ago? Do you have anything about 2020?
 


The DOJ that Obama weaponized for partisan gain has been literally caught lying to a federal judge, doctoring evidence, and illegally spying to frame Trump and falsely exonerate Hillary, to rig and steal the presidency. That's OBAMA corrupting the DOJ (like he did every other part of the Federal Government), dumb-ass, not President Trump. It is asinine lunatic extremism to suggest that President Trump getting justice is the introduction of corruption, rather than the removal of it.

:bs:



View attachment 15912

Repeating this already debunked fallacy won't make it less debunked. :nono:

Again, Hillary "Bleachbit and Hammers" Clinton destroys evidence under subpoena, silences witnesses, stonewalls, and obstructs justice in every conceivable way EVERY SINGLE TIME she is caught doing something criminal. She then says, well you don't have enough evidence to convict [because I destroyed it while dragging this whole thing out for more than a year] and your investigation is now old, so this was just another 'vast right-wing conspiracy."

Same playbook, literally every single time. :bs:

The problem with this? Each time, actual evidence establishing that she did in fact commit the crime DOES emerge, as when Comey identified more than a hundred separate felonies and federal crimes of hers in the speech in which he announced nothing would be done about it.

View attachment 15913

That's not "overlooking" anything, dishonest demagogue. It's called Democrat privilege. And you don't get to use Democrat privilege to argue that the crime did not occur.



Same as your other two attempts to use this fallacy. Evidence WAS produced showing that she committed crimes with Uranium One. Democrats (especially Hillary) just don't get prosecuted. Again, you don't get to use Democrat privilege as proof that the crime did not occur.

View attachment 15914

You are off your rocker.
 
Still crying like a baby about Hillary with fake stories.

Wait...

1) Comey identifying more than a hundred separate Hillary felonies while announcing nothing would be done about any of them is...her not COMMITTING THOSE CRIMES?

:thinking:

How does THAT work? :laugh:

2) The most pathological sore loser crybabies in history that have spent literally four years straight humiliating themselves with false accusations against President Trump...are accusing ANYONE else of "crying with fake stories?"

:rofl2:

3) I didn't bring it up. Learn how to read. Trumpet tried to introduce the left's billionth debunked off-topic smear against President Trump, this time about him begging China for help in the election (speaking of 'crying like a baby with fake stories'), and someone who ALSO WAS NOT ME pointed out that it was proven that only Democrats actually committed that crime (as usual).

giphy.webp


See how that works? Garbage in, garbage out. Don't cry with off-topic smears and people won't obliterate you by pointing out that ONLY DEMOCRATS actually did what they're falsely accusing others of.

Comprehend it yet? :awesome:

You have no shame.

A hilarious thing to say considering the steaming load of horse shit you were just caught peddling. :lolup:

Do you know Hillary was 4 years ago?

Do YOU? Democrats are the only ones who still can't seem to handle the fact that they lost power (for damn good reason...you're treasonous Constitution-shredding enemies of this country and everything it stands for).

:yayaseesathreadban:

Do you have anything about 2020?

Why yes I do...the thing that was brought up by ME...you know, the OP...about Democrats humiliating themselves again by mocking President Trump for being right?

200.gif
 
Geez. tRump's abysmal polling numbers have the racist crowd becoming unhinged.
It sadly resembles a "train wreck". You don't really want to watch, but you can't help yourself.

Yep! It must be really really sad for them watching their Idiot-In-Chief's TRUMP TRAIN derail!

tenor.gif
 
Yep! It must be really really sad for them watching their Idiot-In-Chief's TRUMP TRAIN derail!

tenor.gif

It's a trend with them and its going to get worse. They simply see the "iceberg" coming and realize that Captain "Shitforbrains" tRump is simply too incompetent to do anything about it.
 
Geez. tRump's abysmal polling numbers have the racist crowd becoming unhinged.

Desperate diversionary spin from the same notoriously wrong "experts" who told us Hillary had a 92% chance of winning...which is why wildly over-sampling Democrats to manufacture bullshit polling results convinces NO ONE that a child-groping racist crook with Alzheimer's is in the lead on ANYTHING.

nyt hillary election.jpg

:rofl2:

It sadly resembles a "train wreck". You don't really want to watch, but you can't help yourself.

Empty posturing is not refutation. :dunno:

giphy.webp
 
Back
Top