If I remember correctly, a GOP house interrogated Clinton about 4 years ago for a couple of days, and came-up with nothing
You remember INCORRECTLY.
![Naughty :nono: :nono:](https://www.justplainpolitics.com/images/smilies/naughty.gif)
1) Hillary "Bleachbit and Hammers" Clinton destroys evidence under subpoena, silences witnesses, stonewalls, and obstructs justice in every conceivable way EVERY SINGLE TIME she is caught doing something criminal. She then says, well you don't have enough evidence to convict [because I destroyed it while dragging this whole thing out for more than a year] and your investigation is now old, so this was just another 'vast right-wing conspiracy."
Same playbook, literally every single time.
![BS Flag :bs: :bs:](https://www.justplainpolitics.com/images/smilies/bs1.gif)
2) The problem with this? Each time, actual evidence establishing that she did in fact commit the crime DOES emerge, as when Comey identified more than a hundred separate felonies and federal crimes of hers in the speech in which he announced nothing would be done about it.
![comey mueller obstruction.jpg comey mueller obstruction.jpg](https://www.justplainpolitics.com/data/attachments/11/11731-f93d47f958319637ee5079c42efed27e.jpg?hash=-T1H-Vgxlj)
That's not "coming up with nothing," dishonest demagogue. It's called Democrat privilege. And you don't get to use Democrat privilege to argue that the crime did not occur.
![200.webp](https://media0.giphy.com/media/xT5P0xr3oUJM1xNH5S/200.webp?cid=ecf05e4746eca90dd5e6169f08dbb76d7b7ed43b1ca7d26c&rid=200.webp)
And for the record on Chinagate...
“The FBI uncovered evidence about the alleged plan, in part, through electronic intercepts. . . . The plan, first discussed in early 1995, called for Chinese officials to channel more than $2 million into U.S. campaigns.”
China Was Bill Clinton’s Russia
China Was Bill Clinton’s Russia