Democrats Move to Disenfranchise Voters in 46 States

[Uncensored2008]

Free and fair elections are the bane of the democratic party. When elections are held without tampering, democrats lose. The Election Integrity laws passed by 11 resulted in democrats having 18 million less votes in 2024 than they did in 2020.

In a naked bid to seize power and a show of contempt for voting rights, the democrat party has moved to disenfranchise voters in the majority of American states. democrats seek to limit voting for president to the 4 most populous states, shutting out voters from the process in what democrats and their press call "fly over country." democrats want California and New York to appoint the president - avoiding the risk of losing elections.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1868747050822910438

The electoral college is a constitutional provision, meaning that this idiocy by Schumer and his fellow thugs is just posturing, it would require a Constitutional Amendment. But democrats are nothing if not stupid - and evil.

 

[Uncensored2008]

There is nothing democrats hate more than democracy - fact.

 

[Tbird19482]

There is nothing democrats hate more than democracy - fact.

yet they are NOT the ones backing a want to be Dictator are they?

 

[Uncensored2008]

yet they are NOT the ones backing a want to be Dictator are they?

Try to follow along on the thread - your filthy party is attempting to disenfranchise voters in 46 states.

 

[Tbird19482]

Try to follow along on the thread - your filthy party is attempting to disenfranchise voters in 46 states.

View attachment 38007

And have you even paid attention to what the Right has been doing to make it harder for some AMERICANS to vote?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Free and fair elections are the bane of the democratic party. When elections are held without tampering, democrats lose. The Election Integrity laws passed by 11 resulted in democrats having 18 million less votes in 2024 than they did in 2020.

In a naked bid to seize power and a show of contempt for voting rights, the democrat party has moved to disenfranchise voters in the majority of American states. democrats seek to limit voting for president to the 4 most populous states, shutting out voters from the process in what democrats and their press call "fly over country." democrats want California and New York to appoint the president - avoiding the risk of losing elections.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1868747050822910438

The electoral college is a constitutional provision, meaning that this idiocy by Schumer and his fellow thugs is just posturing, it would require a Constitutional Amendment. But democrats are nothing if not stupid - and evil.

Wow. I guess the only way to support the Constitution is to not let Dems follow the Constitution.

There is no bill to eliminate the Electoral College. An amendment to the Constitution was introduced. Those who aren't as stupid as Uncensored should be aware that there is a process in the Constitution that allows for the Constitution to be amended.

Maybe you shouldn't be getting your news from X. Uncensored.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5043206-senate-democrats-abolish-electoral-college/

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Try to follow along on the thread - your filthy party is attempting to disenfranchise voters in 46 states.

View attachment 38007

How does it disenfranchise voters if they can vote and their vote has the same value as every one else that votes?

 

[anonymoose]

And have you even paid attention to what the Right has been doing to make it harder for some AMERICANS to vote?

I hear they want to confirm identification.

 

[Earl]

The salient part:

“Harris lost in all seven of the presidential battleground states, including the three states that made up the “blue wall”: Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.”

The far left Democratic Socialist loons just lost the popular vote and now want to go to a popular vote.

 

[Yakuda]

And have you even paid attention to what the Right has been doing to make it harder for some AMERICANS to vote?

Proving who you are makes it harder to vote? That narrative doesnt work or where you not paying attention on November 5th?

 

[RB 60]

I hear they want to confirm identification.
Which is rayciss of course.

This was the first election I needed to show ID. No problem.

 

[anonymoose]

This was the first election I needed to show ID. No problem.

Well that's because you're wealthy enough to afford an ID apparently.

 

[RB 60]

Well that's because you're wealthy enough to afford an ID apparently.

Maybe it's because my precinct wanted to make sure there was no fraud? But yeah, driver's license fees went up

 

[Uncensored2008]

And have you even paid attention to what the Right has been doing to make it harder for some AMERICANS to vote?

Whataboutism is childish.

YOUR party - the Stalinist democrats - are trying to take the right to vote for president away from the citizens of 46 states.

 

[Uncensored2008]

How does it disenfranchise voters if they can vote and their vote has the same value as every one else that votes?

Their vote has no value. Your party wants New York and California to appoint the president. You want to shut the rest of the nation out of the process.

Explains your zeal to import as many illegal aliens as you can - they tend to concentrate in the large cities.

I guess the reason illegals concentrate in blue cities is that is where the vegetables are grown so they can pick them, like you commies claim...

 

[Yakuda]

Maybe it's because my precinct wanted to make sure there was no fraud? But yeah, driver's license fees went up

And most state issues IDs are free

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Try to follow along on the thread - your filthy party is attempting to disenfranchise voters in 46 states.

View attachment 38007

I realize math is really, really, really hard for you, Uncensored, but the 4 largest US states have less than 30% of the US population and their voting patterns would not result in cancelling out the rest of the country.

12 states would have to vote exclusively for one candidate before the other states wouldn't matter and no state has ever had 100% of their popular vote go to one candidate.

 

[Yakuda]

I realize math is really, really, really hard for you, Uncensored, but the 4 largest US states have less than 30% of the US population and their voting patterns would not result in cancelling out the rest of the country.

12 states would have to vote exclusively for one candidate before the other states wouldn't matter and no state has ever had 100% of their popular vote go to one candidate.

What do you mean by "largest"? Want to guess what the 4 most "populated" states are? Hint: Two of them are blue states and their combined populations are higher than the other two states which are red.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I realize math is really, really, really hard for you, Uncensored, but the 4 largest US states have less than 30% of the US population and their voting patterns would not result in cancelling out the rest of the country.

12 states would have to vote exclusively for one candidate before the other states wouldn't matter and no state has ever had 100% of their popular vote go to one candidate.

Someone has no grasp of ratios and statistical grouping...

Without the EC - 4 states, California, New York, Texas, and Florida would decide every presidential election going forward. The only time other states would have any voice at all is if there were significant conflict among dominant states.

The REASON democrats hate the electoral college is that it gives a voice to "flyover country," and you want to silence that voice. You want to disenfranchise the voters in 46 states. You, like all leftists, seek raw power and will do anything to ensure your party has it.

 

[Yakuda]

Their vote has no value. Your party wants New York and California to appoint the president. You want to shut the rest of the nation out of the process.

Explains your zeal to import as many illegal aliens as you can - they tend to concentrate in the large cities.

I guess the reason illegals concentrate in blue cities is that is where the vegetables are grown so they can pick them, like you commies claim...

The first and fourth most populated states, which are blue, have a combined population higher than the second and third most populated states which are red. In other words it would play out just like you said.