Did HRC destroy the Democrat Party?

[MAGA MAN]

Holy shite; you post on a political message board, and you've never heard of Perez, Ellison or Cory Booker? Or even Tim Ryan?

Sorry, man. That's a reflection on you - not on the future of the Dem party.

Yes, it's a reflection on me, as a disinterested party to the inner workings of the DNC. Just like 99% of all Americans. LOL

 

[canceled.2021.1]

U mad, bro?

Why would I be mad?

Let me guess you are one of those internet geniuses that can discern emotion from a post?

Good on ya

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You kidding? The Dems have a serious bench. Tim Ryan, Joe Crowley, Linda Sanchez, Cheri Bustos, Eric Swalwell, Ruben Gallego, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker. Obviously, Sanders is still in the mix in terms of emotional leadership and vision. Perez & Ellison both have a lot of energy & a real vision.

I'll take that future leadership over the tweeting pathological liar any ol' day.

kamala harris?????? are you serious?????? never gonna happen. not with her record against gun rights. NEVER!!!!!

 

[PostmodernProphet]

U mad, bro?

I was shocked that a Demmycrat got the highest number of votes when the Republicans were divided between five candidates.....it does amaze me that he got more than 18% of the vote.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Women are going to run in numbers not seen before in our politics, they are starting at the local level.

thank god for Republican women.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

You kidding? The Dems have a serious bench. Tim Ryan, Joe Crowley, Linda Sanchez, Cheri Bustos, Eric Swalwell, Ruben Gallego, Kamala Harris, Cory Booker. Obviously, Sanders is still in the mix in terms of emotional leadership and vision. Perez & Ellison both have a lot of energy & a real vision.

I'll take that future leadership over the tweeting pathological liar any ol' day.

man you got name recognition problems......Booker the only name from that list I've even heard of.........

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Hillary is basically a dictator and, like any good dictator, over many years she destroyed everything around her trying to amass power. We truly dodged a bullet by defeating her. Now the cover is off, exposing the inner workings of the Democrat Party, and it's not pretty.

When Republicans and Their "Liberal" Agents Talk About Trickledown Among Themselves, They Call It "Gold Water"

Her spoiled stuck-up class of born-rich snobs infiltrated the "Democratic" Party in the 60s after their class's favorite, Barry Goldwater, lost in a landslide in 1964. There they purposely instituted an irrational, insulting, and threatening agenda to trick the majority into voting for the top-heavy Lizardtarian economics of their fathers' party. They don't have minds of their own; they lie to themselves about what truly motivates them. They are totally driven to establish Birth-Class Supremacy. Mission accomplish. Their fake party must be annihilated and the Republicans must split into Populists and economic elitists.

 

[USFREEDOM911]

Women are going to run in numbers not seen before in our politics, they are starting at the local level.

thank god for Republican women.......

Rana seems to be suggesting that ALL WOMEN are liberals.

 

[BRUTALITOPS]

Women are going to run in numbers not seen before in our politics, they are starting at the local level.

no evidence for this beyond your feels. Even if it did exist there is no evidence it can sustain. Try objective data for a change instead of your fee fees.

 

[Cancel 2018.1]

.

I'll take that future leadership over the tweeting pathological liar any ol' day.

As long as hillary's not in there I'm ambivalent. Just as I already am with repubs.

 

[Phantasmal]

no evidence for this beyond your feels. Even if it did exist there is no evidence it can sustain. Try objective data for a change instead of your fee fees.

lol, you just hate it that women are coming up! Poor rejected Grind

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Rana seems to be suggesting that ALL WOMEN are liberals.

she also suggests she knows what she's talking about......she's always wrong.......

 

[MAGA MAN]

lol, you just hate it that women are coming up! Poor rejected Grind

He asked for evidence, pointed out that you had nothing but feels, and your response was no evidence and more feels. lol

 

[CFM]

Women are going to run in numbers not seen before in our politics, they are starting at the local level.

Not a problem with women running unless, like Hillary, they expect people to vote for them because they are women.

 

[Lightbringer]

Quite the opposite. Democrats are beyond energized right now - and Trump is redefining the GOP for years to come.

Can't wait for '18.

Neither can I.

 

[Cancel 2020.1]

Neither can I.

Do you think the GOP can expand on their current majority?

 

[CFM]

Do you think the GOP can expand on their current majority?

I'd ask you but you and many others that speak like you do thought Hillary was going to win easily in 2016. You were wrong. Why should be listen to you now.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

no evidence for this beyond your feels. Even if it did exist there is no evidence it can sustain. Try objective data for a change instead of your fee fees.

she probably had a meeting with other stay at home lefty mommies with not much to do and they all agreed, so there

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Do you think the GOP can expand on their current majority?

Anything is possible. Anyone claiming they know for certain what will happen in 2018 is fooling themselves and just shows how little they know about politics.

You claim you have all of this energy, but where was it in 2016 when you wanted Hillary in the Oval Office? Do you regret not doing more for her?

 

[MAGA MAN]

Anything is possible. Anyone claiming they know for certain what will happen in 2018 is fooling themselves and just shows how little they know about politics.

You claim you have all of this energy, but where was it in 2016 when you wanted Hillary in the Oval Office? Do you regret not doing more for her?

Why didn't Thing vote for her more?