Tobytone
Verified User
Never said I was, can you show me the statement that supports that? Typical libtard drone, seeing things that aren't there.SO if you aren't a Christian, why are you a Young Earth Creationist?????????
Never said I was, can you show me the statement that supports that? Typical libtard drone, seeing things that aren't there.SO if you aren't a Christian, why are you a Young Earth Creationist?????????
Never said I was, can you show me the statement that supports that? Typical libtard drone, seeing things that aren't there.
I argued the possibility that's at least backed up by historical records, which is more than 'Scientists' have for their theories. Just to clarify for libtards because they need it every time. The whole argument is centered around the fact that the theories for the summarized events of Earth's history going back 4.5 billion years are no more than a guess backed up with flimsy methods used to support such theories. My point is that textbooks, professors, Hollywood, media reports, etc., have forgotten the word or words 'theory' or 'our best guess' or even 'most scientists agree that their theories are accurate' even though that last one is a stretch at best.You argued for a Flood Deposit for the Grand Canyon. That's YEC.
I suspect you'll temper that view when the reality of Trump's policy is known in detail. Time will tell.I still love this h1b betrayer!
I argued the possibility that's at least backed up by historical records, which is more than 'Scientists' have for their theories. Just to clarify for libtards because they need it every time. The whole argument is centered around the fact that the theories for the summarized events of Earth's history going back 4.5 billion years are no more than a guess backed up with flimsy methods used to support such theories. My point is that textbooks, professors, Hollywood, media reports, etc., have forgotten the word or words 'theory' or 'our best guess' or even 'most scientists agree that their theories are accurate' even though that last one is a stretch at best.
I hope this helps clear up what is obvious to most.
temper which view?I suspect you'll temper that view when the reality of Trump's policy is known in detail. Time will tell.
Again, I didn't say my beliefs are not religious. You really have problems with comprehension. I suspect if you did go to college, you had woke professors that cheated you from learning how to articulate and comprehend ideas. Sad, to say the least.So if it isn't based on religion then it is based on an abject lack of any education in the sciences.
Got it. Makes sense now. You're just really uneducated.
Best case scenario is both.temper which view?
the still love part or the calling him betrayer part?
conflicted is conflicted.Best case scenario is both.
Again, I didn't say my beliefs are not religious. You really have problems with comprehension. I suspect if you did go to college, you had woke professors that cheated you from learning how to articulate and comprehend ideas. Sad, to say the least.
I've proved over and over that your supposed 'education' has done nothing to help you understand even the simplest of concepts, for real. You completely wasted the hard earned dollars of your parents or the governments in the form of loans you'll never pay back.
Shhhh, Carrie Underwood is singing America the Beautiful and it's divine.
epic.Again, I didn't say my beliefs are not religious. You really have problems with comprehension. I suspect if you did go to college, you had woke professors that cheated you from learning how to articulate and comprehend ideas. Sad, to say the least.
I've proved over and over that your supposed 'education' has done nothing to help you understand even the simplest of concepts, for real. You completely wasted the hard earned dollars of your parents or the governments in the form of loans you'll never pay back.
Shhhh, Carrie Underwood is singing America the Beautiful and it's divine.
Just another schmoe out there, wading through all the shit on my way to the promise land. I think that's a fitting description for many people. I am no exception to the majority, however, I might be more of an exception on this site. It's quite full of libtards.epic.
who are you tobytone?
i think the proper division is populism versus elitism.Just another schmoe out there, wading through all the shit on my way to the promise land. I think that's a fitting description for many people. I am no exception to the majority, however, I might be more of an exception on this site. It's quite full of libtards.
That just sparked a very interesting exercise if there was a good way to pull it off. hmmm, I can't think of one right now, but wouldn't it be interesting to see the ratio of libtard to non-libtards on this site? Who do you think is in the majority?
Sure, but nothing can or will happen instantly or without mistakes. The real problem of the vast difference between haves and have-nots has been pondered by many brilliant people over thousands of years. Many different approaches to mitigate the spread have been implemented without much success, in fact, mostly disastrous. I think the focus should be on making equal opportunity without infringing on others' rights. Even if we were completely successful creating perfect equality of opportunity, there would still be very different outcomes. As for equality of outcome, tens of millions of people have died horrific deaths in the 20th century alone when that was the focus, yet to this day, either evil power-hungry 'leaders' or people with mostly good intentions but ignorant of the attempt and/or the result want to continue to try.i think the proper division is populism versus elitism.
everything else is a programming hellscape.
wrong.Sure, but nothing can or will happen instantly or without mistakes. The real problem of the vast difference between haves and have-nots has been pondered by many brilliant people over thousands of years. Many different approaches to mitigate the spread have been implemented without much success, in fact, mostly disastrous. I think the focus should be on making equal opportunity without infringing on others' rights. Even if we were completely successful creating perfect equality of opportunity, there would still be very different outcomes. As for equality of outcome, tens of millions of people have died horrific deaths in the 20th century alone when that was the focus, yet to this day, either evil power-hungry 'leaders' or people with mostly good intentions but ignorant of the attempt and/or the result want to continue to try.
I would recommend that anybody troubled by these differences in outcomes from either goal learn and understand something called the Pareto distribution. Its genesis is from I believe, the 19th century, when Mr. Pareto discovered that so many things in nature or creative endeavors fall into a consistent pattern. To keep this from getting ridiculously longer, I'll give just a few examples but understand that there are thousands and the theory is not political or biased at all, it's just observations. Example one: Pareto's first discovery that set him on the path of proving his theory was that he noticed roughly 80% of the peas he harvested came from 20% of the pea pods. Hmm, he said. He moved on to say the least. Next, he discovered that in Italy, 80% of the land was owned by 20% of the landowners. This held true of monetary wealth as well. Also, 80% of the board feet of lumber produced in a given area would come from just 20% of the trees. A kind of fun one to think about is that you likely wear 20% of your clothes 80% of the time, and so on. This remarkably extends to anything - art, sports, the stars in the sky, production at a plant or by salesmen, 80% of the wealth a singer earns comes from 20% of their work. And perhaps the most famous one although I thinks it's credited to Prices law but 80% of sales revenue will come from 20% of you customers. You get the idea. The work done on wealth and assets held true regardless of the system of governing. Even in the earliest days of any socialist society before everything goes haywire, the formula held true.
So, what's my point? If you merely take a snapshot at any time in history, you can always find many injustices and inequalities, but if you step back and look at the long game, you'll see we live in the best country with the best opportunities of all human history. Your beefs with H1B visas are a speck on a dog's ass when you look at the overall great things an Administration focused on its people's safety, well-being, wealth, and equal opportunity are doing to grow the idea that we are truly the land of opportunity. That goes for any admin I described, not just Trump. When looking objectively at the whole picture, it's hard to argue the ball isn't moving in the right direction. Biden, on the other hand, not so much. Finally, we don't even know the policy yet, maybe, wait for that and you may be surprised.
the kelo decision has destroyed property rights.Sure, but nothing can or will happen instantly or without mistakes. The real problem of the vast difference between haves and have-nots has been pondered by many brilliant people over thousands of years. Many different approaches to mitigate the spread have been implemented without much success, in fact, mostly disastrous. I think the focus should be on making equal opportunity without infringing on others' rights. Even if we were completely successful creating perfect equality of opportunity, there would still be very different outcomes. As for equality of outcome, tens of millions of people have died horrific deaths in the 20th century alone when that was the focus, yet to this day, either evil power-hungry 'leaders' or people with mostly good intentions but ignorant of the attempt and/or the result want to continue to try.
I would recommend that anybody troubled by these differences in outcomes from either goal learn and understand something called the Pareto distribution. Its genesis is from I believe, the 19th century, when Mr. Pareto discovered that so many things in nature or creative endeavors fall into a consistent pattern. To keep this from getting ridiculously longer, I'll give just a few examples but understand that there are thousands and the theory is not political or biased at all, it's just observations. Example one: Pareto's first discovery that set him on the path of proving his theory was that he noticed roughly 80% of the peas he harvested came from 20% of the pea pods. Hmm, he said. He moved on to say the least. Next, he discovered that in Italy, 80% of the land was owned by 20% of the landowners. This held true of monetary wealth as well. Also, 80% of the board feet of lumber produced in a given area would come from just 20% of the trees. A kind of fun one to think about is that you likely wear 20% of your clothes 80% of the time, and so on. This remarkably extends to anything - art, sports, the stars in the sky, production at a plant or by salesmen, 80% of the wealth a singer earns comes from 20% of their work. And perhaps the most famous one although I thinks it's credited to Prices law but 80% of sales revenue will come from 20% of you customers. You get the idea. The work done on wealth and assets held true regardless of the system of governing. Even in the earliest days of any socialist society before everything goes haywire, the formula held true.
So, what's my point? If you merely take a snapshot at any time in history, you can always find many injustices and inequalities, but if you step back and look at the long game, you'll see we live in the best country with the best opportunities of all human history. Your beefs with H1B visas are a speck on a dog's ass when you look at the overall great things an Administration focused on its people's safety, well-being, wealth, and equal opportunity are doing to grow the idea that we are truly the land of opportunity. That goes for any admin I described, not just Trump. When looking objectively at the whole picture, it's hard to argue the ball isn't moving in the right direction. Biden, on the other hand, not so much. Finally, we don't even know the policy yet, maybe, wait for that and you may be surprised.
LOL, that was my best effort at trying to talk you off the ledge. Epic fail. I give up, maybe some other approach out there will crack the code. For your blood pressure and all the associated problems from too much stress you better hope someone can. Keep soldiering on.wrong.
we've solved the feudalisms of the past.
Nazi authoratarian oligarchs want to return to that.
globalist techno-feudalism I call it.
all your word are a vain effort at a simple lie.
you full of bullshit.LOL, that was my best effort at trying to talk you off the ledge. Epic fail. I give up, maybe some other approach out there will crack the code. For your blood pressure and all the associated problems from too much stress you better hope someone can. Keep soldiering on.