DId the Maine shooter have the right to bear an AR-15?

Very good! Their rights should've suspended when they've shown that can't reasonably exercise that right. Apparently there's hope for you

Obama had a mechanism in place to do just that and it was rescinded by the Republicans. You know. Your people.
 
where did you go?

I replied to your sophomoric questions, now it is your turn

You asked about the rights of an individual in Maine. So what about the rights of an individual in Mexico

Do you have the power to intervene in what he can possess? if no, why is this different?

I had an appointment.
 
this is you, avoiding reality so you don't have to admit you're wrong.

I embrace reality. For instance, I would NEVER claim something critical to the function of a modern society “cannot be necessary” simply because there’s no mention of it in the Constitution.

That kind of claim would be the height of stupidity, don’t you think?
 
where did you go?

I replied to your sophomoric questions, now it is your turn

You asked about the rights of an individual in Maine. So what about the rights of an individual in Mexico

Do you have the power to intervene in what he can possess? if no, why is this different?

I do not know the legal rights of an individual in Mexico, I believe all people have some rights they are born with and governments should respect.

I am not a voter in Mexico and not part of their DEMOCRACY, so I do not have the power to have any say so.
 
the degrees that lead you to believe that limits should make others safer.......which is in direct conflict with the founders and the constitution

So why do I not have a right to an ICBM? It has to do with safety of others, right?
 
Good question, we will elect people to make that call. We are a Democracy after all.

First of all no. I barely trust the people I vote for to do the right thing let alone elect people who will preemptively decide who's rights should be suspended . Are you fucking kidding me? BTW all your whining doesn't make us a democracy.
 
First of all no. I barely trust the people I vote for to do the right thing let alone elect people who will preemptively decide who's rights should be suspended . Are you fucking kidding me? BTW all your whining doesn't make us a democracy.

So how do you suggest we change our Constitution? Who do you think should make these decisions?
 
I embrace reality. For instance, I would NEVER claim something critical to the function of a modern society “cannot be necessary” simply because there’s no mention of it in the Constitution.

That kind of claim would be the height of stupidity, don’t you think?

which is why I never made that claim, yet you continue to believe that I did so you don't look stupid.
 
Obama had a mechanism in place to do just that and it was rescinded by the Republicans. You know. Your people.

Right because no one in govt ever has ulterior motives. Comments like yours make me suspect you see Republicans as the bad guys so I don't dont want your type involved
 
I do not know the legal rights of an individual in Mexico, I believe all people have some rights they are born with and governments should respect.

I am not a voter in Mexico and not part of their DEMOCRACY, so I do not have the power to have any say so.

so why would you have a say in Maine?
 
Back
Top