Dinesh D'Souza claims Michelle's thesis at Princeton was illiterate and incoherent

The noted hack Dinesh D. is lying his ass off.

Michelle Obama's thesis is written in the dry, boring, academic style that practically all master's thesis are. That is hardly grounds for criticism.
But it is not even remotely "illiterate", and the writing is in fact better than 99.9999999999999999999999999999999 percent of the writing any rightwinger has ever posted on this forum in the last 12 years.

My opinion is, why take the word of a Trump loving rightwing hack, when you can read her thesis one's self?
https://www.politico.com/pdf/080222_MOPrincetonThesis_1-251.pdf
The convicted on probation criminal Dinesh D.
 
Hitchens is the bottom of the barrel lol?

I have taken the time to read her thesis, well most of it anyway, and it's a real politically correct snoozefest to be honest. I couldn't for the life of me work out the point of it other than blacks had a hard time at Princeton apparently. She loves using commas, here is just one example. What is she trying to say, can anybody translate for me?

To me the thesis comes across as little more than race baiting narcissism with a large measure of self pity. Maybe she should have confined her thoughts to her diary rather a supposed academic thesis?


If people spend a lot of time around Blacks, do they report feeling more comfortable around Blacks, in a survey, than people who have not spent as much time around Blacks?
 
Last edited:
I have taken the time to read her thesis, well most of it anyway, and it's a real politically correct snoozefest to be honest. I couldn't for the life of me work out the point of it other than blacks had a hard time at Princeton. She loves using commas, here is just one example. However what is she trying to say, can anybody translate for me?

Please tell me I write better than that lol.
 
D'Souza, yes, but what was Hitchens' problem?


He was very fond of taking on sacred cows, Mother Theresa and Bill Clinton are excellent examples. He also liked to play Devil's advocate a lot.
If you read up on his journey from being a Trotskyist till he became totally sick of PC ponticating, you'll maybe see why.
 
He was very fond of taking on sacred cows, Mother Theresa and Bill Clinton are excellent examples. He also liked to play Devil's advocate a lot.
If you read up on his journey from being a Trotskyist till he became totally sick of PC ponticating, you'll maybe see why.

I read some of his critiques, the one on Mother Theresa and the one on Diana. He also skewered Bill Clinton, Kissinger and others; all of his subjects were famous. That's why I don't get the criticism of Michelle Obama. When he took her on she was just the little-known wife of a presidential candidate, not nearly on the level of his other marks.
 
Thread wrap-up:

It actually says a lot about wingnuts that when they want to mock the mental acuity of liberals, the best they can do is to mock a First Lady of the United States who graduated from Princeton, got a law degree from Harvard, and is widely respected for her personality, intelligence, and humanity. She can really dance too!

That tells you right there that any attempts to mock liberal mental acuity operates in a target-poor environment. ...or are reduced to making shit up out of whole cloth.

In stark contrast, on a daily basis I can point tp shit that Trump says that is laughably stupid, incredibly inarticulate, and shockingly dim-witted.
 
Thread wrap-up:

It actually says a lot about wingnuts that when they want to mock the mental acuity of liberals, the best they can do is to mock a First Lady of the United States who graduated from Princeton, got a law degree from Harvard, and is widely respected for her personality, intelligence, and humanity. She can really dance too!

That tells you right there that any attempts to mock liberal mental acuity operates in a target-poor environment. ...or are reduced to making shit up out of whole cloth.

In stark contrast, on a daily basis I can point tp shit that Trump says that is laughably stupid, incredibly inarticulate, and shockingly dim-witted.

AND most of the wing nuts probably didn't gradiate from High Scrooll.
 
Thread wrap-up:

It actually says a lot about wingnuts that when they want to mock the mental acuity of liberals, the best they can do is to mock a First Lady of the United States who graduated from Princeton, got a law degree from Harvard, and is widely respected for her personality, intelligence, and humanity. She can really dance too!

That tells you right there that any attempts to mock liberal mental acuity operates in a target-poor environment. ...or are reduced to making shit up out of whole cloth.

In stark contrast, on a daily basis I can point tp shit that Trump says that is laughably stupid, incredibly inarticulate, and shockingly dim-witted.

Just as an aside, wonder where we can read the senior thesis trump paid somebody to write for him. :)
 
Just as an aside, wonder where we can read the senior thesis trump paid somebody to write for him. :)

Ha!

All I have to do is read Trump's tweets to know that he is a total dumb ass, and that First Lady Michele Obama is his intellectual superior in every measurable way.
 
As long as you Trump supporters continue to defend that illiterate ignorant ego driven child then pointing fingers at anyone and claiming they write poorly, speak poorly or are in any way intellectually deficient (according to your impossibly low bar set when you threw in your support for Trump) is viewed as the utter bullshit and finger pointing that has become the norm for the lot of you.

While you insist on closing your eyes, ears, and intellect to the disaster that is Trump, you cannot resist pointing out even the minutest of supposed defects you must squint to find in others who are superior human beings to Trump (and yourselves) in all measurable ways.
 
Back
Top