oh?....did you have anything to refute my "lies"....I thought a reference to scientific realities was rather effective.....1 + 1 = 2......1,000,000 divided by 94 is what again?......ah yes........10k+
Which of your lies have I not responded to?
oh?....did you have anything to refute my "lies"....I thought a reference to scientific realities was rather effective.....1 + 1 = 2......1,000,000 divided by 94 is what again?......ah yes........10k+
excellent choice.....I deny the claim of 1million dead is scientifically possible and I have no intention of changing that tune......
How does that explain you? Sheep?
Thanks, but answer the question.I like you too, big guy.
How does that explain you? Sheep?
Thanks, but answer the question.
I was wondering why you weren't participating in this thread.
I guess it just took you this long to fit in a sexual reference.
Your mind is in the gutter. I was referring to your obvious inclination to follow.
O.K., I'll give you that one.
Really? Me following? Read this thread. Some liberals are also objecting to my premise. How does that make me a follower?
The subject now is: "the more educated and intelligent one is, the more likely one is to have liberal veiws [sic]".
You've admitted that you're not that educated or intelligent, so how does that explain your liberalism?
No doubt you have paper on the wall than I. You are clearly less knowledgable though, which is what matters.
OK, so you haven't yet admitted you're not intelligent, just demonstrated it. But that is clearly an admission of less education.
So again, how does "more education" explain your liberalism?
Didn't say I was less educated. I just don't like wallpaper. I have my walls painted instead.
.I'm willing to bet I'm better edumacated then you are.
It was all over the news all day long you lying sack of shit. Proove it wasn't.
LOL I can't believe that you, of all people, are attempting to now be the spelling police. And here, where my mis-spelling was clearly intentional.Right. You can't even spell educated, but you have more of it than I do?
LOL I can't believe that you, of all people, are attempting to now be the spelling police. And here, where my mis-spelling was clearly intentional.
So is the bet on?
Again, if such is the case (that the leadership was saying that Iraq was responsible) you'll have no problem at all linking us to quotes from anybody in the leadership saying Iraq was responsible for 9/11.Are you serious? The whole point of posting the poll is to show that Pmp's claim was false: "starting from the beginning, nobody claimed Iraq had anything to do with 9/11.....that's a baseless claim from the left and always has been...."
People believed it then and they believe it now. In fact, a Newsweek poll from a few years ago showed that the belief increased over time.
A new Newsweek poll out this weekend exposed "gaps" in America's knowledge of history and current events.
Perhaps most alarmingly, 41% of Americans answered 'Yes' to the question "Do you think Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq was directly involved in planning, financing, or carrying out the terrorist attacks of September 11th, 2001?"
That total is actually up 5 points since September 2004.
http://www.newsweek.com/2007/09/04/dunce-cap-nation.html#
So liar (mind if I just call you liar from now on since the name fits you so well?), How do you explain the phenomon that the more educated and intelligent one is, the more likely one is to have liberal veiws?
Which of your lies have I not responded to?