Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
You just don't get it do you, shit for brains.
History will judge this.
still nothing.....
LOL
You just don't get it do you, shit for brains.
History will judge this.
still nothing.....
LOL
It was all over the news all day long you lying sack of shit. Proove it wasn't.
I didn't run from shit. You and Bravo are as good at name calling as Post modern prophet is at lying.
I have no intention of squirming. I don't expect deniers to change their tune.
The whole point of posting the poll is to show that Pmp's claim was false: "starting from the beginning, nobody claimed Iraq had anything to do with 9/11.....that's a baseless claim from the left and always has been...."
silly girl.....the fact that some people believed he was involved doesn't mean anyone claimed it.....
wouldn't it have been easier to prove your point if you actually linked someone saying it?.....oh, that's right......you couldn't.....
this is typical of the liberal mindset......
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/581
the fact that Bush said Saddam was not connected to the 9/11 attacks is proof that Bush said Saddam was connected to the 9/11 attacks...
Here's one, Joe Schmo from Kokomo. Happy?
and the article you linked doesn't help.
Disparity much?Makes assertion, offers no proof to support it. Demands proof to counter unproven assertion.
You just don't get it do you, shit for brains.
History will judge this.
I take back my earlier comments about you sounding like a conservative... you are sounding more and more like a TROLL!
Can you be any more goofy? ....Ratings? You think our government spent hundreds of billions of dollars and countless soldiers lives, so that TV and press could have better ratings?
No one "pressured" Bush into doing a DAMN thing! He tried, for two years solid, to remedy the situation in Iraq through diplomatic efforts. Finally, after every effort had been (reasonably) exhausted, with the authorization voted on by Congress, he used his authority to order the invasion and liberation of Iraq. There was no pressure for him to do this, to the contrary, the pressure was for him to NOT do it, and as soon as he did, that pressure turned into anti-war vitriol, and it still hasn't subsided, even after the war was won, Saddam was toppled, and Clinton's 1998 Iraq Liberation Act was realized, with a functioning democratic government in Iraq.
Now.... Jump ahead to Egypt... and we have the same anti-war liberals lecturing us about the need for democracy in Egypt! It's the Bush Fucking Doctrine! Being promoted and lauded by LIBERALS!
It was all over the news all day long you lying sack of shit. Proove it wasn't.
lol....typical liberal delusion.....can't prove it is, but expects us to prove it isn't.....
No, we just expect you to provide a site with proof that it was a fiction cooked up by liberals...
And so I shall....
The evidence here rests solely with one side. You, Dune, do not rest on that side.
I judge this not to be a genocide. I also judge you to be a saw horse, a tool whose sole goal is to assist other tools.
HISTORY has spoken!
lol....I'm not claiming it's a conspiracy....I'm expecting it's merely a side effect of the fact all liberals are idiots......
Disparity much?
Seriously, you have somewhere around 75 posts in this thread, not a one of them contains evidence, yet you feel you have some sort of claim to being correct or demanding evidence from anyone else?
How does that explain you? Sheep?So liar (mind if I just call you liar from now on since the name fits you so well?), How do you explain the phenomon that the more educated and intelligent one is, the more likely one is to have liberal veiws?