Do you still support America's genocide in the Middle East?

I didn't run from shit. You and Bravo are as good at name calling as Post modern prophet is at lying.

oh?....did you have anything to refute my "lies"....I thought a reference to scientific realities was rather effective.....1 + 1 = 2......1,000,000 divided by 94 is what again?......ah yes........10k+
 
The whole point of posting the poll is to show that Pmp's claim was false: "starting from the beginning, nobody claimed Iraq had anything to do with 9/11.....that's a baseless claim from the left and always has been...."

silly girl.....the fact that some people believed he was involved doesn't mean anyone claimed it.....

wouldn't it have been easier to prove your point if you actually linked someone saying it?.....oh, that's right......you couldn't.....

this is typical of the liberal mindset......

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/581

the fact that Bush said Saddam was not connected to the 9/11 attacks is proof that Bush said Saddam was connected to the 9/11 attacks...
 
Last edited:
silly girl.....the fact that some people believed he was involved doesn't mean anyone claimed it.....

wouldn't it have been easier to prove your point if you actually linked someone saying it?.....oh, that's right......you couldn't.....

this is typical of the liberal mindset......

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/581

the fact that Bush said Saddam was not connected to the 9/11 attacks is proof that Bush said Saddam was connected to the 9/11 attacks...

:rolleyes: What "name" do you want?

Here's one, Joe Schmo from Kokomo. Happy?

You're only ignoring polls because they've shown something you don't want to believe, and the article you linked doesn't help.

"But how frequently did Bush make this acknowledgment? Not often, at least not publicly. Instead, he repeatedly (and much more memorably) juxtaposed references to the 9/11 terror attacks to those of Saddam Hussein, thereby helping to create the false impression that Saddam Hussein was connected to 9/11.

For instance, on January 31, 2003, President Bush stated: "The strategic view of America changed after September the 11th. We must deal with threats before they hurt the American people again. And as I have said repeatedly, Saddam Hussein would like nothing more than to use a terrorist network to attack and to kill and leave no fingerprints behind."
 
Last edited:
Makes assertion, offers no proof to support it. Demands proof to counter unproven assertion.
Disparity much?

Seriously, you have somewhere around 75 posts in this thread, not a one of them contains evidence, yet you feel you have some sort of claim to being correct or demanding evidence from anyone else?
 
You just don't get it do you, shit for brains.

History will judge this.

And so I shall....

The evidence here rests solely with one side. You, Dune, do not rest on that side.

I judge this not to be a genocide. I also judge you to be a saw horse, a tool whose sole goal is to assist other tools.

HISTORY has spoken!
 
I take back my earlier comments about you sounding like a conservative... you are sounding more and more like a TROLL!

Can you be any more goofy? ....Ratings? You think our government spent hundreds of billions of dollars and countless soldiers lives, so that TV and press could have better ratings?

No one "pressured" Bush into doing a DAMN thing! He tried, for two years solid, to remedy the situation in Iraq through diplomatic efforts. Finally, after every effort had been (reasonably) exhausted, with the authorization voted on by Congress, he used his authority to order the invasion and liberation of Iraq. There was no pressure for him to do this, to the contrary, the pressure was for him to NOT do it, and as soon as he did, that pressure turned into anti-war vitriol, and it still hasn't subsided, even after the war was won, Saddam was toppled, and Clinton's 1998 Iraq Liberation Act was realized, with a functioning democratic government in Iraq.

Now.... Jump ahead to Egypt... and we have the same anti-war liberals lecturing us about the need for democracy in Egypt! It's the Bush Fucking Doctrine! Being promoted and lauded by LIBERALS!

Sounded like he was using sarcasm.
 
And so I shall....

The evidence here rests solely with one side. You, Dune, do not rest on that side.

I judge this not to be a genocide. I also judge you to be a saw horse, a tool whose sole goal is to assist other tools.

HISTORY has spoken!

Wonderful post. Though I disagree with the present version of history's judgement, I aplaud very much the creativity of this post. Thankyou.
 
lol....I'm not claiming it's a conspiracy....I'm expecting it's merely a side effect of the fact all liberals are idiots......

So liar (mind if I just call you liar from now on since the name fits you so well?), How do you explain the phenomon that the more educated and intelligent one is, the more likely one is to have liberal veiws?
 
Disparity much?

Seriously, you have somewhere around 75 posts in this thread, not a one of them contains evidence, yet you feel you have some sort of claim to being correct or demanding evidence from anyone else?

Sorry, but the quote you attached my name to in your post above, did not derive from me.
 
So liar (mind if I just call you liar from now on since the name fits you so well?), How do you explain the phenomon that the more educated and intelligent one is, the more likely one is to have liberal veiws?
How does that explain you? Sheep?
 
Back
Top