Do you think many on the right even understand what the Founding Fathers did?

LV426 said:
Speaking of which, you didn't respond to the statutes I clearly posted for you on that other thread.

You ran away from them.

It's obvious why.
Click to expand...

it's obvious you didn't pay attention to the thread, because I did respond and show you how what you posted proved me right. ROFL. you really should stop trying to discuss the law with me. you aren't smart enough to do that
 
LV426 said:
You didn't even go to college, so what the fuck do you think you know about this shit?

Nothing.
Click to expand...
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:
ROFL!!!!! yes, if someone didn't go to college then they are clearly not smart enough to understand plain text ROFL!!!!!
:laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh::laugh:

you are the epitome of those I talk about, those who think they are smarter than others who didn't go to college when it's clear that they can't be trusted to flip my burger on the grill
 
LV426 said:
But education falls under general welfare, so what else ya got?
Click to expand...

That doesn't mean it was codified in the Constitution which means it's not a federal function.

The 10th Amendment clearly states that if it isn't spelled out in the Constitution as a federal power it is something the states or people have the right to do. Education and Housing and Urban Development are not functions of the federal government.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Click to expand...
https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/amendment/amendment-x
 
LV426 said:
Of which there is a 6-3 partisan bent.

So you're arguing that SCOTUS is non-partisan, but it clearly is partisan since 4 of the 6 Conservative justices were nominated by a Conservative who lost the popular vote, and 5 of the 6 Conservative justices were approved by Senators that represent less than half the population of the country.
Click to expand...

And what if that "partisan bent" was the other way around? Would you still complain?
 
Hello martin,

martin said:
It does now. Public schools barely existed at the Founding if they existed at all. Anyway, it's a mistake to put education in the hands of politicians. Traditionally it's been left to educators and should remain that way.
Click to expand...

If we elect good people it is not an issue.

The problem is people are so misinformed they don't know which way is up. Thanks to social media rumors.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
That doesn't mean it was codified in the Constitution which means it's not a federal function.
Click to expand...

Yes, it actually does mean that.

Quite literally.


\The 10th Amendment clearly states that if it isn't spelled out in the Constitution as a federal power
Click to expand...

And General Welfare is something Congress can legislate, and education is inarguably a part of the general welfare.

So again, what else ya got?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
And what if that "partisan bent" was the other way around? Would you still complain?
Click to expand...

Yes, of course.

Unlike you, I am nothing if not consistent in my beliefs.

I believe the Supreme Court should be expanded to at least 15 justices, and the justices all serve terms between the circuit courts and the Supreme court.

So they rotate between the various courts, so that the SCOTUS composition is different for each cycle.
 
LV426 said:
Why do you hate it?

You're the one who hates educated people because they make you feel stupid, and educated people wrote the Bill of Rights.
Click to expand...

I love the bill of rights.

totalitarianism is regressive and stupid, not intelligent or indicative of education.
 
Hello reagansghost,

reagansghost said:
they neglect to mention the framers were creating the document to address the existential threat George III posed....that was the 'tyrant' in question

instead righties claim the very government the framers created with the constitution is tyrannical

they abuse the 2d Amendment in the same way.........A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.........to them 'securing a free state' means they can label the opposition party tyrannical and attack because the constitution said they can

conservative extremism has been despoiling the entire planet since day one
Click to expand...

The 2nd was never intended to allow armed citizens to attack the government. It was intended so that we could quickly form an army to defend the nation. Remember, the Constitution said we would not have a standing army.

Now that we have a standing army and it is very well regulated so that we can trust it, perhaps we need to give the 2nd another look-see. It appears to be outdated and causing a lot of problems. Sandy Hook, Marjorie Stoneman Douglas, Columbine, Las Vegas, etc, etc, etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top