Do you think they have much on Comey?

Earl said:
I’ll repeat this since my last post explaining this was 3 minutes ago.

The Feds won’t release it to me.

Why are you now sucking Comey’s Johnson?
Click to expand...
You are playing word games, and it’s clear to, kinda pitiful.

What makes you believe the video exists?
 
Damocles said:
Did you say anything when the Braindead Administration was pushing everyone that disagreed with them off the public forum, or is this the sudden clarity that comes when you think it is being done to people you agree with?
Click to expand...
I’ve seen no evidence President Biden did that. Neither have you!
 
Damocles said:
Again. He did not. For 50 years he hid the crime. Those years matter. He broke the law for more than half his life. And you think that just saying I'll cooperate should exonerate him for a felony level criminal activity? If I kill someone, should I get away with it because I was helpful in the investigation? Nonsense. If I had done just a smidgeon of what he has done when I was in the Navy, it would not matter how "helpful" I was, I'd still be in prison today.
Click to expand...
You’d be in prison and so would Trump. The difference is that you couldn’t stall long enough to regain presidential immunity. It’s called “intent to conceal” and that intent was weak or missing with Biden, not Trump.
 
Damocles said:
Well, considering that the witnesses for the prosecution testified under oath before Congress already I think their testimony is likely to be the same under oath a second time. Do I think it is enough to convict Comey in Virginia where it is near impossible to convict a Swamp Creature? No.
Click to expand...
Agreed. I see jury nullification in the future.
 
Earl said:
This is a comedic episode of Smithsonian proportions.

The far left loons are sucking the dick of the one person who prevented the Hildabeast from becoming president.

Too funny.
Click to expand...
Trump has the ability to make the Democrats do the most funny thing.
 
Damocles said:
Well, considering that the witnesses for the prosecution testified under oath before Congress already I think their testimony is likely to be the same under oath a second time. Do I think it is enough to convict Comey in Virginia where it is near impossible to convict a Swamp Creature? No.
Click to expand...
Yeah, yeah. We’ve heard that same bullshit before when Trump was found guilty in New York.
 
Damocles said:
Well, considering that the witnesses for the prosecution testified under oath before Congress already I think their testimony is likely to be the same under oath a second time. Do I think it is enough to convict Comey in Virginia where it is near impossible to convict a Swamp Creature? No.
Click to expand...
Do you think it would be enough to convict him in Colorado?
 
FastLane said:
Trump has the ability to make the Democrats do the most funny thing.
Click to expand...
He has them sucking the Johnson (In the modern vernacular) of the man who prevented the Hildabeast from becoming the president.

It’s beyond Orwellian.
 
Last edited:
Damocles said:
That's nonsense. I think that Zuckerberg's statements are credible, and so do you.

www.pbs.org

Zuckerberg says the White House pressured Facebook to 'censor' some COVID-19 content during the pandemic

Zuckerberg alleges that the officials, including those from the White House, "repeatedly pressured" Facebook for months to take down "certain COVID-19 content including humor and satire."
www.pbs.org www.pbs.org
Click to expand...
I’ve read that article, where does it say president Biden threatened Twitter?

What did the administration do to pressure them? Did they politely ask? Or did they say the FCC was going to “have a lot of work to do”?
 
Jarod said:
Do you think it would be enough to convict him in Colorado?
Click to expand...
It would be difficult to convict any democrat for politically motivated crimes in Colorado. In Virginia it is more specific to powerful folks in DC. In Colorado, it would be specific to democrats.
 
Damocles said:
Did you say anything when the Braindead Administration was pushing everyone that disagreed with them off the public forum, or is this the sudden clarity that comes when you think it is being done to people you agree with?
Click to expand...

I did w/ what I saw recently about COVID. But there really isn't much comparison here. This board gets very caught up in the whole idea of prove yourself! Prove you have offered condemnation for all sides! I wasn't a Biden fan, but I don't buy into the assumptions about things he did or didn't do. Show me real coercion and inappropriate behavior, and I won't be hypocritical about it.

I have never seen anything like what Trump is doing previously. It's is in broad daylight, it is stark, and beyond all of that - it is being celebrated by many of his supporters. Like, they simply do not care about the implications, or about the overreach.

That's why some keep bringing up the creep into authoritarianism. That creep relies on a willing populace, which can be defined as a critical mass of those who not only support what's being done, but celebrate it.
 
Damocles said:
That's nonsense. I think that Zuckerberg's statements are credible, and so do you.

www.pbs.org

Zuckerberg says the White House pressured Facebook to 'censor' some COVID-19 content during the pandemic

Zuckerberg alleges that the officials, including those from the White House, "repeatedly pressured" Facebook for months to take down "certain COVID-19 content including humor and satire."
www.pbs.org www.pbs.org
Click to expand...
Are you trying to equate minimizing misinformation about COVID when millions were dying to the FCC strong arming a TV comedian because he pissed off the President?
 
QP! said:
i am not even saying McCabe did anything wrong, as there is doubt there too.

What i am saying is 'he said, he or she said' disputes are amongst the hardest cases to get a jury to a conclusion on 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. It almost always requires substantial other fact points or investigations pointing to who is lying, for a jury to get there.

In this case the most substantial fact point we know of is the IG Investigation which basically affirmed Comey's credibly in his account while saying they had doubts over McCabe's.

So when the jury hears that and reads that Investigation report, how that would not give them doubt, seems beyond impossible.
Click to expand...
but he lied about the steele dossier being used to justify trump persectution.

:truestory:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top