Do you think they have much on Comey?

Damocles said:
Please, it was all he did. He had opinions, yes. You and others disagreed with them, yes. He would give you a microphone and hold a conversation with you. Sometimes they left in disagreement, but there was a conversation. Sometimes the folks got up to the mic and just said nasty garbage, he would let them and they would leave. I didn't even see him get angry at those folks. He'd say something like, "Okay. You just spent all day waiting in line for that." and then "Next question."
Click to expand...
Bullshit. His shtik was to “debate” hapless kids who weren’t really old enough or well informed enough to know how to debate. Like shooting fish in a barrel. There was no “conversation”. He was smugly condescending.

His intolerant religious beliefs denigrated gays, trans, blacks, immigrants, Muslims. And his hateful rhetoric got him killed.
 
Earl said:
Accountability is not revenge.


Spiritually, the right hand symbolizes power, authority, action, and honor, rooted in ancient cultural traditions where it was associated with good, strength, and God's divine power. It represents God's might and authority, as seen in the phrase "at the right hand of God," signifying a position of highest honor and power. For people, it signifies their actions, responsibilities, and the things they hold sacred or most important.

I believe that President Trump sits at the right hand of God.

He was spared death by a few millimeters.

The left will try to kill him…again but he sits at the right hand of God.
Click to expand...
Explain why your god allows an abomination like Trump to continue. Why there is unnecessary suffering by innocents in this world. Why your god remains hidden rather than come forward to his followers to straighten out his message to all those who have fucked it up.

Trump doesn’t know Second Corinthians from Two Corinthians.
 
Damocles said:
At this moment, right now, in this "place" in history. Comey is now a hero of the left, because if Trump hates someone, they think that they should love them.

I truly believe that if Trump and RFK had a joint news conference to tell you oxygen was good for you, that they'd be handing out plastic bags to "show him"...
Click to expand...
you are a complete joke and liar projecting what the right does on to the left when you CANNOT cite any major figures on the left who suddenly are expressing love for Comey or John Bolton, etc, etc. Heck the left even says if Bill gates and Bill clinton are in the epstein files and guilty of bad stuff let them rot.

It is the magats on the right who immediately reverses on any and all positions Trump flips on daily. They are against groomers and pedophilias and want them punished. Oh wait, Trump wants to reward them and help them... well we are ok with that then.

We are free speech absolutists and bringing comedy back. Oh wait, comedians are mocking Trump and he is sicking his govt on them to cancel them... we are all for that now as they deserve it and free speech should be regulated by the FCC.

We can go on and on showing what you claim to be true about the left is the entire philosophy of the right now and YOU CANNOT cite any examples of your lie on the left.
 
Earl said:
I will repeat…”at the right hand of God," signifying a position of highest honor and power. For people, it signifies their actions, responsibilities, and the things they hold sacred or most important.

This is where I believe Trump now resides.
Click to expand...
Your religion, and Charlie Kirk, says faith, not deeds gets you to heaven. Trump has no faith.
 
zymurgy said:
only two people refused and quit - one was a relative (they both would be fired for refusing)

now you know. So a family member quitting - you think maybe that is a part of your debate that is weak and you should drop?

Now how about a quote from a guy in 2022 that would have no idea about new evidence in the last 12 months? Maybe his quote isn't so powerful either?
Click to expand...
Citation?
 
BartenderElite said:
Sounds like you're still not getting the concept here.

You see everything through a partisan lens. Some things are much more about principle.
Click to expand...
What principles allowed two people to attempt to assassinate the president after the president was called Hitler, Nazi, Fascist?
 
QP! said:
Too get a grand jury indictment the Prosecutors can present as much or as little as they want and they usually only present what they think would convince a GJ.

In this case the best way to get an indictment from a GJ who does not know the case facts is simply to present McCabes statements saying 'Comey knew and authorized it' without presenting any countering material.

Of course, based on that alone, if you are saying you want to indict for lying to Congress a GJ would say yes as they are not seeing the information that destroys that statement by McCabe as a point of evidence worth anything.
Click to expand...
Sort of like Bragg did to bring his case against Trump, hum?
 
Jarod said:
I have always found most jurors make a strong effort to follow the law, the lawyers will get rid of anyone who shows a strong preference, or if their social media shows a strong preference.

I honestly do not know the evidence yet and no opinion as to his guilt. If I were a lawyer I’d push hard that this is a political prosecution, using some of trump’s comments as evidence.

I believe with strong evidence he would likely be convicted Even with a slightly biased jury, and vice versa. It is harder to convict than acquit.

You you believe he would have been indicted if Trump did not demand revenge?
Click to expand...
You are not a lawyer, Pretender. It's not about Trump. It's about perjury.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
I always find it amazing how cult members like you simply live in your own reality.
Biden didn't refuse to return classified documents.
Click to expand...
Biden had classified documents for TWO YEARS. He was NEVER supposed to have them AT ALL.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Biden didn't try to hide documents when a court subpoenaed them.
Click to expand...
YES HE DID. The documents were IN HIS HOUSE and available to agents from China and Ukraine!
Poor Richard Saunders said:
That is why Trump was indicted.
Click to expand...
For what? Trump broke no law. Trump is FULLY AUTHORIZED to have classified documents.
Poor Richard Saunders said:
If he had simply returned the documents, he would not have been indicted.
Click to expand...
He doesn't need to return the documents. He is AUTHORIZED to have them.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Sort of like Bragg did to bring his case against Trump, hum?
Click to expand...
it is typically what all prosecutors, including Bragg do yes, and thus why the statement has always existed 'a prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich'.

It is why we do not put much in the indictment and instead look to the trial where you have the very high bar of 'beyond a reasonable doubt', which Bragg was able to nail Trump on.

But even though Prosecutors can typically secure almost 100% of indictments from Grand Juries that is not the case with this Trump DOJ who are losing on that one sided presentation in shocking fashion due to how weaponized they are and how bad the cases are., Even when presented on only one side (the DOJ side) the GJ are often saying 'no... you have nothing'.
 
Jarod said:
Do you understand that Bill Barr said that there was not enough to evidence to convict Comey and refused?

Two republican prosecutors at DOJ refused for the same reason.
Click to expand...
You do understand he was talking about the leaking itself not the lying to Congress, right? That there are others, under oath, that have testified that Comey was lying. You do realize this right?
 
Cypress said:
The defense has a strong case that Trump openly interfered with the case by publicly demanding DOJ bring an indictment, and firing the lawyers who told him there was no case.
Click to expand...

Bullshit.

But irrelevant - you SCREAMED that there would be no indictments. Just as you demanded that Obama would get a 4th term.

Now you demand that he will be acquitted - I strongly doubt that. The evidence that he made false statements is irrefutable. All you can depend on is jury nullification because he is anti-Trump.

1758923376110.png
 
LurchAddams said:
My guess is the US Attorney will try to make any testimony private, citing "national security concerns", Comey's legal team will not for it - and trump's attorney will have to find a safe exit. trump will blame the judge or some shit like he always does!
Click to expand...
Either way, this is going to make for great t.v..
 
domer76 said:
Bullshit. His shtik was to “debate” hapless kids who weren’t really old enough or well informed enough to know how to debate. Like shooting fish in a barrel. There was no “conversation”. He was smugly condescending.

His intolerant religious beliefs denigrated gays, trans, blacks, immigrants, Muslims. And his hateful rhetoric got him killed.
Click to expand...
BS. He went to Oxford, where they had all the faculty ready to debate him. And he did well. Professors would regularly grab a mic and think they were going to win and still looked like fools at his events. I get that you didn't like him, but he would have listened to you before he gave you his opinion. He didn't demand you agree either, just asked that we hold dialogue, and when he would tell you why it was because if we no longer have dialogue we have violence.

That kid wanted him to shut up, to end dialogue, he wanted monologue, and in his entitled little mind he thought murder was justified for the crime of disagreement.

It wasn't his rhetoric that got him killed, it was his effectiveness and the insistence we call political disagreement "evil".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top