Do you think they have much on Comey?

[Althea]

Trump has converted the DOJ into his Gestapo, and now Trump's Gestapo is going after Trump's adversaries for purposes of revenge.

He PROMISED voters that he would do it. This is the nation the electorate wants (evidently)

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is the admin of personal grievance.

ROFL

Indicted for perverting the FBI to attack the opposition president - but you go with that...

 

[Althea]

BS. He went to Oxford, where they had all the faculty ready to debate him. And he did well. Professors would regularly grab a mic and think they were going to win and still looked like fools at his events. I get that you didn't like him, but he would have listened to you before he gave you his opinion. He didn't demand you agree either, just that we hold dialogue, because if we no longer have dialogue we have violence.

That kid wanted him to shut up, and in his entitled little mind he thought murder was justified for the crime of disagreement.

It wasn't his rhetoric that got him killed, it was his effectiveness and the insistence we call political disagreement "evil".

Your depiction of the creep is nothing even close to reality. He did not debate. He had control of the discussion, and when it wasn't going his way he changed the topic or simply yelled talking points at the person he was 'debating'.

 

[Uncensored2008]

An indictment is one thing, but a conviction is a complete other matter.

You're counting on Jury Nullification. But if the trial isn't in DC or NY City - that is not very likely.

 

[Althea]

But after he got away with not releasing the Epstein files, I do not see much that will get people to turn on him.

He hasn't gotten away with anything. trump is all about dominating the news cycle so he can run out the clock on the issues that he wants to avoid.

 

[Uncensored2008]

MAGA just falls in line behind whatever Trump says.

It's pretty obvious what happened here, and why this is being done.

Because Comey made false statements in order to try and overthrow the duly elected POTUS.

The irony of you whining the this is political is so far beyond the pale..

 

[Jarod]

You do understand he was talking about the leaking itself not the lying to Congress, right? That there are others, under oath, that have testified that Comey was lying. You do realize this right?

Who testified that Comey was lying, what I read was that McCabe testified that he told Comey about the leak after the fact and that Comey thought it was good it was released.

Do you have a quote of what McCabe said? I do not believe anyone specifically said Comey “was lying”. It appears it was much more ambit than that.

Chat GPT says….

• McCabe has given statements that are in tension or direct contradiction with Comey’s on certain disclosures to the media (e.g. McCabe said he authorized a leak and later told Comey about it)

James Comey Indicted For Alleged False Statements—Here’s What He Told Congress

It’s still unclear what basis the government has for indicting Comey—but either way, evidence suggests they may have issues proving their case.

www.forbes.com

I can’t imagine you can authorize a leak after it happened, can you?

 

[Phantasmal]

Who testified that Comey was lying, what I read was that McCabe testified that he told Comey about the leak after the fact and that Comey thought it was good it was released.

Do you have a quote of what McCabe said? I do not believe anyone specifically said Comey “was lying”. It appears it was much more ambit than that.

Chat GPT says….

• McCabe has given statements that are in tension or direct contradiction with Comey’s on certain disclosures to the media (e.g. McCabe said he authorized a leak and later told Comey about it)

James Comey Indicted For Alleged False Statements—Here’s What He Told Congress

It’s still unclear what basis the government has for indicting Comey—but either way, evidence suggests they may have issues proving their case.

www.forbes.com

Don’t you think it will be thrown out because of Trump’s language and his posts on Truth Social?

 

[Jarod]

He hasn't gotten away with anything. trump is all about dominating the news cycle so he can run out the clock on the issues that he wants to avoid.

Epstein files

 

[Uncensored2008]

And you support hurting people financially if they're innocent?

You do.

As long as they are enemies of Team Evil.

 

[BartenderElite]

You do.

As long as they are enemies of Team Evil.

That's a pretty blatant lie.

Unless, of course, you can produce a quote of me saying anything like that?

No, you can't. So, you just lost this little "debate" we're having.

 

[LurchAddams]

Either way, this is going to make for great t.v..

I doubt trump will let the trial air on TV, he'd have his fake lawyer drop the charges before he let Comey have a public megaphone.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Don’t you think it will be thrown out because of Trump’s language and his posts on Truth Social?

I don't think your going to have injustice Juan Merchan presiding.

What you and the defense fear is a fair and honest trial. Since Comey is undeniably guilty - a fair trial has him convicted. I think Jeanine Pirro should be the presiding judge.

 

[Earl]

Oh, Earl - what a poor, desperate & completely unrelated comment that is.

A complete grasp. Truly, pathetic.

So, you have no answer to, what principles allowed two people to attempt to assassinate the president after the president was called Hitler, Nazi, Fascist?

You could have just said so.

 

[BartenderElite]

So, you have no answer to, what principles allowed two people to attempt to assassinate the president after the president was called Hitler, Nazi, Fascist?

You could have just said so.

It's a nonsensical question. Anyone who tries to assassinate anyone is by definition a lunatic, and unprincipled. Your equivalency fails, because it doesn't exist.

And now, you can explain to me all about the differences between calling someone a Nazi of Fascist, and calling a group of people (a large group of people) vermin, communists, socialists, "the enemy within," evil, and scum.

Let's hear it Earl. Please - pontificate on what the difference is in that rhetoric.

 

[domer76]

BS. He went to Oxford, where they had all the faculty ready to debate him. And he did well. Professors would regularly grab a mic and think they were going to win and still looked like fools at his events. I get that you didn't like him, but he would have listened to you before he gave you his opinion. He didn't demand you agree either, just asked that we hold dialogue, and when he would tell you why it was because if we no longer have dialogue we have violence.

That kid wanted him to shut up, to end dialogue, he wanted monologue, and in his entitled little mind he thought murder was justified for the crime of disagreement.

It wasn't his rhetoric that got him killed, it was his effectiveness and the insistence we call political disagreement "evil".

Nope. His hateful rhetoric got himself killed.

He condoned violence in his sick defense of the Second Amendment.
He condoned violence when he mocked Gazans for having no tall buildings to toss gays from.

He didn’t listen. He had his canned responses and that was it.

Fucking dead and good riddance.

 

[Uncensored2008]

That's a pretty blatant lie.

Hardly - you cheered on the persecution of Trump, Papadopoulos, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, et al.

Unless, of course, you can produce a quote of me saying anything like that?

No, you can't. So, you just lost this little "debate" we're having.

Nonsense. You've spent years cheering on the lawfare attacks on the opposition.

 

[BartenderElite]

Hardly - you cheered on the persecution of Trump, Papadopoulos, Roger Stone, Steve Bannon, et al.



Nonsense. You've spent years cheering on the lawfare attacks on the opposition.

Produce a quote or 2.

You are lying. You can't.

 

[Earl]

It's a nonsensical question. Anyone who tries to assassinate anyone is by definition a lunatic, and unprincipled. Your equivalency fails, because it doesn't exist.

And now, you can explain to me all about the differences between calling someone a Nazi of Fascist, and calling a group of people (a large group of people) vermin, communists, socialists, "the enemy within," evil, and scum.

Let's hear it Earl. Please - pontificate on what the difference is in that rhetoric.

So, you have no answer to, what principles allowed two people to attempt to assassinate the president after the president was called Hitler, Nazi, Fascist?

You could have just said so.

 

[BartenderElite]

So, you have no answer to, what principles allowed two people to attempt to assassinate the president after the president was called Hitler, Nazi, Fascist?

You could have just said so.

LOL

Thanks, Earl. I appreciate your admission here.