Do you Trumppers support US war with Iran ?

[Earl]

You think so? If it does not happen, will TACO have failed?

No, it means that Israel did it.

Do you want President Trump to fail?

How unpatriotic.

Get a clue.

 

[Jarod]

No, it means that Israel did it.

Get a clue.n

So no need to use American bombs to destroy the underground facility?

 

[Earl]

You think so? If it does not happen, will TACO have failed?

Are you actually taking a position?

I took a position…I posted that you are an old queen…do you deny it?

 

[Earl]

So no need to use American bombs to destroy the underground facility?

Do you care who destroys it?

 

[Jarod]

Do you care who destroys it?

I think only we could do it.

Answer the question, should we?

 

[Earl]

Let’s be clear, a nuclear Iran is an existential threat to the entire free world.

Israel and America are the only countries with enough huevos to address this.

The rest are cowards.

As to who stops the threat, just get it done.

After it’s done, it’s a moot issue…especially to Iran.

 

[Jarod]

Let’s be clear, a nuclear Iran is an existential threat threat to the entire free world.

Israel and America are the only countries with enough huevos to address this.

The rest are cowards.

There is not a nuclear Iran.

You wont answer the question.

I understand. Must protect TACO at all costs.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Its the same thing as " you don't want to wake up to a Mushroom Cloud."

Fearmongering is used by malicious politicians because it works.

IF Iran used a nuke, is there any doubt that'd be the end of the present Iranian government if not a few of their major cities?

The main reason Iran wants nukes is to prevent being invaded like Iraq or Ukraine.

The main reason to stop them is to prevent a nuclear arms race in the ME/Persian Gulf region and increase the likelihood nukes would be used by opposing powers. Look at India and Pakistan for an example of the dangers.

 

[Jarod]

Fearmongering is used by malicious politicians because it works.

IF Iran used a nuke, is there any doubt that'd be the end of the present Iranian government if not a few of their major cities?

The main reason Iran wants nukes is to prevent being invaded like Iraq or Ukraine.

The main reason to stop them is to prevent a nuclear arms race in the ME/Persian Gulf region and increase the likelihood nukes would be used by opposing powers. Look at India and Pakistan for an example of the dangers.

Its clear they do not have one.

 

[Cypress]

Trump is not my Messiah; Jesus Christ is. I don't support everything that Trump does, although I DO support MOST things that Trump does. The "support everything" issue is YOUR'S, not mine... It is leftists who do the whole "hive mind" thing because they can't think for themselves.

Generally speaking, I don't support war on Iran. I don't see any reason to believe that Trump supports war on Iran.

Incorrect. While I do advocate for peace, I don't wave flowers around nor do I support "isolationism" (but one could also say that I do depending on how one wishes to define exactly what "isolationism" means).

I've never seen you openly oppose anything your Tangerine Messiah has done. Including his serial adultery, his lying, his self-centered narcissism, his grotesque materialism.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I have posted that it poses an existential nuclear threat to Israel, the U.S., and the rest of the world.

Very ignorant of you to ignore an existential nuclear threat.

This is an existential nuclear threat to Israel, America and the entire world.

Let’s be clear, a nuclear Iran is an existential threat to the entire free world.

Anyone want to guess what phrase Earl heard on his favorite MAGAt twitter feed?

Earl, you keep calling a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat yet you can't explain why. Is it because you don't know or because you know you are lying?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Its clear they do not have one.

They're working on it for the aforementioned reasons.

Why did the US develop nuclear weapons? Hint: So a vile enemy wouldn't develop them first.

 

[Jarod]

They're working on it for the aforementioned reasons.

Why did the US develop nuclear weapons? Hint: So a vile enemy wouldn't develop them first.

They are working on it, for sure. And, yes, for the goal of deterrence.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

They are working on it, for sure. And, yes, for the goal of deterrence.

Agreed on deterrence. They don't want their plans to foment international terrorism to be stopped.

Is there any doubt that October 7th would never have happened without the funding and training support of Iran?

 

[Jarod]

Agreed on deterrence. They don't want their plans to foment international terrorism to be stopped.

Is there any doubt that October 7th would never have happened without the funding and training support of Iran?

No doubt.

 

[gfm7175]

I've never seen you openly oppose anything your Tangerine Messiah has done.

Trump is not my Messiah; Jesus Christ is.

I openly opposed Trump's bump stock ban during his first term (which SCOTUS later correctly overturned).

Including his serial adultery, his lying, his self-centered narcissism, his grotesque materialism.

You're not mentioning any specifics here, just vague claims that don't really mean anything. Yes, Trump is far from being a morally perfect person, but so am I. "...let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone..."

 

[Jarod]

Trump is not my Messiah; Jesus Christ is.

I openly opposed Trump's bump stock ban during his first term (which SCOTUS later correctly overturned).

You're not mentioning any specifics here, just vague claims that don't really mean anything. Yes, Trump is far from being a morally perfect person, but so am I. "...let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone..."

If Jesus were your messiah you would not be promoting Trumpism.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

I think that all Islamic theocracies--all theocracies, period--devalue the planet on which we live.
It's up to their own people to overthrow them when they muster the character to do so,
but if they become dangerous to us or our allies,
no military response can be considered excessive.

I've experienced unnecessary, ill-advised war.
Containing Jihadist aggression is NOT THAT.

PS: I, as I hope you know, couldn't be further away from being a "trumpper."
I do eschew that nomenclature, however, in favor of "trumpanzee."

 

[Earl]

I think that all Islamic theocracies--all theocracies, period--devalue the planet on which we live.
It's up to their own people to overthrow them when they muster the character to do so,
but if they become dangerous to us or our allies,
no military response can be considered excessive.

I've experienced unnecessary, ill-advised war.
Containing Jihadist aggression is NOT THAT.

PS: I, as I hope you know, couldn't be further away from being a "trumpper."
I do eschew that nomenclature, however, in favor of "trumpanzee."

No one cares, old man.

Go back to sleep and dream of your imminent judgement.

You could have been a contender.

 

[Phantasmal]

Fearmongering is used by malicious politicians because it works.

IF Iran used a nuke, is there any doubt that'd be the end of the present Iranian government if not a few of their major cities?

The main reason Iran wants nukes is to prevent being invaded like Iraq or Ukraine.

The main reason to stop them is to prevent a nuclear arms race in the ME/Persian Gulf region and increase the likelihood nukes would be used by opposing powers. Look at India and Pakistan for an example of the dangers.

isn’t it ironic that the USA is talking to Saudi Arabia about nuclear capacity