Does a explicit gay scene in the media affects you in a bad way?

...There are likely millions of christians throughout the world who would strongly disagree with you...

I would submit that the left has all but paved the way on taking the most meaningless, random shit and politicizing it and making it a "social movement"...
Which denominations of Christians sits their 5-year-olds down and teaches them that two men holding hands is wrong?

ParallelSandyDinosaur-size_restricted.gif


Left-Wingers tend to be empathetic to a fault. Democrats are labeled bleeding hearts for a reason.
 
Which denominations of Christians sits their 5-year-olds down and teaches them that two men holding hands is wrong?

ParallelSandyDinosaur-size_restricted.gif


Left-Wingers tend to be empathetic to a fault. Democrats are labeled bleeding hearts for a reason.

I don't believe there is one.

There are plenty, though, which teach that sex among two men is wrong.

Or do you see two men holding hands, especially when it's quite common in the culture of one of the men, as a gateway to gay sex?
 
As I said, you were clear as mud...

Correct. I still have no clue why you cannot see the obvious. Perhaps you have a blind spot? Is it hatred? What?

I'm dissatisfied with your ability to have a conversation without wetting your diaper...

Yawn.

Seriously you really think your infantile insults will have any effect on me? :rofl2:

To be fair, there's no small segment of the world's population which identifies "Islam" and "radical Islam" as one in the same.

DEUEEEERRRRUUUUP DEEEUUUUUUHHHHH DERPY DERPY HURRR HURR, you growl.

If you cannot recognize the difference, you may ask me since I was a special needs educator.

But that aside, okay, so you said "Radical Islam". Who do you think is going to teach Muslim children the beliefs of radical Islam?

Wait for it... Radical Islamic parents...


BRRRAAAVOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! THIS GUY GETS IT!!!!

Expecting someone to read between the lines is stupid, and is often the cause of arguments.

Everyone except you understood my OP clearly and it's making you angry.

Seriously you're like this petulant special needs student who throws severe temper tantrums, giving those eardrum shattering screeches, every time his teacher tries to explain something to him.
 
Seriously you're like this petulant special needs student who throws severe temper tantrums, giving those ear shattering screeches, every time his teacher tries to explain something to him.

Seriously, you're like some pinheaded retard who whines incessantly about the same thing over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over over and over again...
 
The commercial itself isn't the problem. It's how certain people would react to it, either consciously or unconsciously, which is the point of this thread.

No different from any commercial addressing sexual assault. Naturally it might trigger some girls and women if it isn't resolved.

Not even the most powerful authoritarian government in the world can legislate stupidity. Stupid is as stupid does. In some cases it's simply ignorance. Teaching is a skill, not something that can be jammed down the throats of people to make them learn. It's a growth process. Trying to force it will result in backlash.

In this case, it's not a social movement, it's a fucking commercial. They don't come cheap, neither to make nor to put on a show. Businesses understand the benefit of advertising. Mixing politics and business is usually a bad idea. If some asshole wants to make a BFD out of a commercial, be it for Kotex or picturing two guys holding hands like Bush and Abdullah, that's on them. They're idiots.
 
I don't believe there is one.

There are plenty, though, which teach that sex among two men is wrong.

Or do you see two men holding hands, especially when it's quite common in the culture of one of the men, as a gateway to gay sex?

Which ones sit down their five year-olds and "teach that sex among two men is wrong"?

That's my point. The OP is about two men holding hands, not two guys raw dogging each other in a seedy hotel. What kind of fucking moron gets upset about that?

No. sexual desires are innate, not "catching" or induced. There are sex acts and sexual preferences. Acts can be controlled, preferences not so much. Unlike some on this thread, I'm not afraid of gays or that they'll infect my grandsons with their gayness.
 
Which ones sit down their five year-olds and "teach that sex among two men is wrong"?

Exactly. I was raised that way with various indoctrination. Those "types of sinners" deserve condemnation and wages of death. What kind of effects do you think that have on children?

By "types", I mean anyone who does not follow their Fundamentalist (or extremist) beliefs are deemed not worthy. And that they are dangerous to the traditional or nuclear families and societies. (I forgot what the type of family is called by those nutjobs)
 
I don’t know him, just what he posts. He is different in his responses to you than I. I think people respond to people in kind. There are, as always, a few exceptions to the rule.
He can wear a mask and play nice if he wants. His true face comes out when posting to me, even when I don't reply.

Agreed about responding in kind. It's usually a tit-for-tat thing, then done.

People who carry revenge or a grudge in their heart have evil in their heart. It varies in size, but it's there. Even with a mask over it. LOL

727yaz.jpg
 
Exactly. I was raised that way with various indoctrination. Those "types of sinners" deserve condemnation and wages of death. What kind of effects do you think that have on children?

By "types", I mean anyone who does not follow their Fundamentalist (or extremist) beliefs are deemed not worthy. And that they are dangerous to the traditional or nuclear families and societies. (I forgot what the type of family is called by those nutjobs)

Times change. I'm certain many families don't even mention it to children.

While the Fundies, like the JPP White Supremacists, are loud, they are few. There seems to be plenty of loud LWers to counter them. :)
 
Times change. I'm certain many families don't even mention it to children.

While the Fundies, like the JPP White Supremacists, are loud, they are few. There seems to be plenty of loud LWers to counter them. :)

For every Fundie and WS retarded parent, there are 5 to 10 children. Figure that one out, Chief.
 
Back
Top