Does the cosmos have a reason?

Does Cypress still believe there is such a thing as a scientific consensus?
scientISTS may say they agree on some political thing.

but its still not science if their opinions were just paid for and not actually based on science.

like big pharma shill tard corrupt doctors lying about vaccines, for instance.
 
Where ever you are, there you are.

Where ever you are, there you are.
pineal_gland_1280x800-1024x640.jpg
 
scientISTS may say they agree on some political thing.
Exactly, and more importantly, scientists can be religious, e.g. Christian, Global Warming, etc.

but its still not science if their opinions were just paid for and not actually based on science.
Correct. It's not science if it's an opinion or is subjective, e.g. a matter of consensus

like big pharma shill tard corrupt doctors lying about vaccines, for instance.
That's one of the many examples we face today. If there is no falsifiable model, it isn't science.
 
Back
Top