DOJ reviewing Zimmerman case

Let's see, who is likely to know more about the subject? A former federal prosecutor or some guy called Rune on the interwebs?
 
Federal law probably doesn't apply, said David Weinstein, a former federal prosecutor in Miami. Unlike the police officers in the King case, Zimmerman wasn't acting "under color of law."

Anyone can violate civil rights, not just the government or someone "acting under the cover of law", moron.
There also is little basis to charge Zimmerman with a federal hate crime, Weinstein said, since prosecutors would have to show that he shot and killed Martin primarily because of the teen's race. Nothing in the state trial suggested it was a racially motivated crime, he said.

NOTHING IN THE STATE TRIAL PROVED IT WASN'T RACIALLY MOTIVATED, FURTHERMORE, NOT ALL THE EVIDENCE WAS PRODUCED.
Additionally, the burden of proof for a civil trial is MUCH lower than that required for a criminal trial.
One can often lose a criminal trial, yet win the civil counterpart.
"Under the law, there is no basis for them to file any charges," Weinstein said about the Department of Justice.
Opinion, unsubstantiated. In fact, the City of Sanford Florida is already under federal investigation, has been for quite a while. Your ex-prosecuter has his own political agenda, and is lying as well.
Under public pressure, he added, the Justice Department may send lawyers to Florida to investigate the case so they can write a report that says "there was nothing there."

"That may satisfy people," Weinstein said.
Already underway, further undermining your "experts" credibility.

By the way, ASSHOLE, you are not Legion. He is extremely intelligent, you are a fool or an idiot, like yurt, playing dumb.


http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/c...ns-at-center-of-Zimmerman-verdict-4664900.php[/QUOTE]
 
it's not going to happen.

First the burden of proof is insanely high. They are going to have to prove that he killed trayvon specifically because trayvon was black. That's basically higher than the burden of 2nd degree murder.

I also think that the government isn't going to want to drag this on, keep the public riled up, they want peace and for people to go back to their lives. Plus imagine if zimmerman wins a second case. How many times do you want to be kicked in the face?

Your simply wrong. The burden of proof is always lower in a civil case.
 
Anyone can violate civil rights, not just the government or someone "acting under the cover of law", moron.

NOTHING IN THE STATE TRIAL PROVED IT WASN'T RACIALLY MOTIVATED, FURTHERMORE, NOT ALL THE EVIDENCE WAS PRODUCED.
Additionally, the burden of proof for a civil trial is MUCH lower than that required for a criminal trial.
One can often lose a criminal trial, yet win the civil counterpart.
Opinion, unsubstantiated. In fact, the City of Sanford Florida is already under federal investigation, has been for quite a while. Your ex-prosecuter has his own political agenda, and is lying as well. Already underway, further undermining your "experts" credibility.

By the way, ASSHOLE, you are not Legion. He is extremely intelligent, you are a fool or an idiot, like yurt, playing dumb.


http://www.greenwichtime.com/news/c...ns-at-center-of-Zimmerman-verdict-4664900.php


absolutely false

why don't you actually engage me in debate instead of your daily insults and whining
 
aren't you able to have immunity in florida for stand your ground? I bet zimmerman is now going to go ahead and get immunity from civil action, and he'll probably get it.

He should file a lawsuit against the Martins, seeing as how they are responsible for their son's actions.
 
you don't want to thank dear ol' legion....fine, have it your way, you asked for legal beagles or whatever to explain their understanding of the ruling ...
 
How do you think that's going to pan out Soc? I personally don't believe Obama has the balls for it.

He doesn't .. and NOTHING will come out of a DOJ investigation.

His tepid response to this is being widely scorned in the black community.

All he had to say was something stupid about the need for gun control .. when in fact, this case points to a need to arm our sons and daughters WITH guns to protect themselves from the monsters.
 
He doesn't .. and NOTHING will come out of a DOJ investigation.

His tepid response to this is being widely scorned in the black community.

All he had to say was something stupid about the need for gun control .. when in fact, this case points to a need to arm our sons and daughters WITH guns to protect themselves from the monsters.

That's a good point. Yeah I agree about Obama.
 
That's a good point. Yeah I agree about Obama.

I would rather have seen Trayvon turn around and shoot that Zimmerman bastard to death for following him than the way it turned out.

Of course all the idiots who support Zimmerman would be crying about Zimmerman being killed for doing nothing.
 
He doesn't .. and NOTHING will come out of a DOJ investigation.

His tepid response to this is being widely scorned in the black community.

All he had to say was something stupid about the need for gun control .. when in fact, this case points to a need to arm our sons and daughters WITH guns to protect themselves from the monsters.

Or maybe parents could teach their sons and daughters, especially their sons, not to assault people and put themselves at risk.
But then, that might mean taking responsibility and we know that liberals are never going to do that; because it might mean they could fail and then what would they do or who could they blame the tragedies on.

By the way, those sons and daughters are already armed or are you willfully overlooking Chicago and their murder rate.
Odd how you haven't taken up just one of those causes.
But since it's mostly black on black, what would you gain; right?
 
Back
Top