What did those women threaten to do? Throw the baby dolls at the house?
It is illegal to protest in front of Supreme court justices homes. For obvious reasons. Enforce the law equally.
Domestic Terrorists Threaten Justice Barrett and Her Family At Their Home
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
It is illegal to protest in front of Supreme court justices homes. For obvious reasons. Enforce the law equally.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
They were standing on a publicly owned street. It is not illegal.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
Do you consider Maxine Waters a domestic terrorist?
"
Maxine Waters encourages supporters to harass Trump ... - CNNhttps://www.cnn.com › 2018/06/25 › politics › maxine-w...
Jun 25, 2018 — Rep. Maxine Waters - “Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up. And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere. We’ve got to get the children connected to their parents,”
The children, too
Maxine Waters calls for protesters to 'get more confrontational ...https://www.cnn.com › maxine-waters-derek-chauvin-trial
Apr 19, 2021 — Washington (CNN) Rep. Maxine Waters on Saturday night called for protesters to "stay on the street" and "get more confrontational" if former ...
Here we go again.
You expect me to answer your question while you ignore mine.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
So if they were protesting the people that live at the house across from the justice's house, it's illegal? Let me see how you weasel your way out of this one.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Birth control in action... Women who couldn't get a date with a collie... Well, at least they won't be adding to the idiocracy in their lifetime...
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Birth control in action... Women who couldn't get a date with a collie... Well, at least they won't be adding to the idiocracy in their lifetime...
Ad hominem strikes again.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Not ad hominem either. I didn't address you or any other poster in my response. I instead, once again used sarcasm and parody to insult the protesters.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
I guess you really don't know what an ad hominem fallacy is.
Birth control in action... Women who couldn't get a date with a collie... Well, at least they won't be adding to the idiocracy in their lifetime...
They'll try to get a govt. grant to buy sperm...and raise a seriously confused, fucked up kid.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
In section 8 housing or a trailer park...
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
Then homeless drug addict it is!
A much higher probability than kids in a traditional family.
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Still not ad hominem...
Those women are making the argument. You attacked them instead of addressing their argument. You are an asshole for attacking them.
zappasguitar
Well-known member
He should check with GROKMASTER.
The GROKSTER knows about the different fallacies...
At least, according to Groky.
T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
NOW, that's ad hominem!
AProudLefty
The remora of JPP
Exactly. The education is for free. You're welcome.