Don't Ask, Don't TELL

Mojo said:
Did someone tell you that your statements must be automatically accepted as factual?

I'm still waiting for those valid arguments againt the repeal of DADT that you said exist in this thread.

While you're compiling that list of links, please include my "insultive" posts.

Thanks!
Click to expand...

If you don't believe that they're factual, just ask Soc.

And I'm still waiting for you to use your limited comprehension skills to educate yourself.

No

Thanks
 
SR_ said:
The difference between being openly homosexual and openly heterosexual is that a homosexual is sexually attracted to others who are of the same sex. So a boy would be sexually attracted to another boy if he were a homosexual.

A heterosexual is sexual attracted to others who are of the opposite sex. So a boy would be sexually attracted to a girl if he were heterosexual.

Both of them being open about it, means they are not hiding their sexual orientation.

That is the difference between being openly homosexual and openly heterosexual.

SR
Click to expand...

You orginally made this seem to be a problem.
What's the problem?
 
"The White House described the legislation as equivalent to civil-rights-era laws that expanded the rights of minorities. The signing ceremony included so many supporters of the move and legislators who approved the bill that it had to be moved to the Department of the Interior, as the White House is full of holiday decorations and tours.

“I couldn’t be prouder,” said Mr. Obama of the repeal of the current “don’t ask don’t tell” policy. The repeal law, he said, "will strengthen our national security and uphold the ideals that our fighting men and women risk their lives to defend."

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politi...t-tell-repeal-Will-there-be-political-fallout
 
Mojo said:
Here's an argument made in opposition to the repeal of DADT:

http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/11/missouri-dadt/
Click to expand...
That is a poor argument, especially about it somehow angering a people we are already at war with. First, you don't get much angrier than wanting to kill someone. Secondly, they're much more likely to be pissed about us allowing women to serve rather than gays. Homosexual activity is the norm in the middle east.
 
"News reports say a package has exploded at Chile's embassy in Rome following a parcel bombing at Switzerland's embassy earlier in the day.

The ANSA news agency says one person was believed to be injured in the blast at the Chilean embassy. Police say the person who opened the package at the Swiss embassy was also seriously injured"...

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/12/23/reports-blast-swiss-embassy-wounds/

Looks like the critics of repeal were right! Terrorists are so enraged at the prospect of openly gay US servicepeople that they have struck already!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top