Liberty
Libertarian Minded
Name of the thread completely lost on you huh?
Historical suppression of the minority vote through violence and intimidation - never heard of it huh?
Like I said; robots.
?

Name of the thread completely lost on you huh?
Historical suppression of the minority vote through violence and intimidation - never heard of it huh?
Like I said; robots.
Wait... Who's white?You're nothing more than a Republican Robot and that you are friends with Buck and Tancredo, well you're white trash to boot!
that's the word that's going around after all....
At the last election (2008) we had D Poll Watchers who, for the first time since I've been working the polls I had never had a challenge before 2008 in a good 18 years worth of being an Election Judge, would challenge about 40% of the voters who were lined up, every one of them who were challenged were Rs who supposedly had "moved". I had to have them fill out a challenge sheet before they voted, some of them got frustrated and left, spoiling their ballot.
Cover? I told a story related to another, that isn't "covering". If any poll watchers (R or D) tried to follow people to the booth, they'd be told that they need to follow the rules I gave them when they took the Poll Watcher Oath (yeah we have to actually make them take an oath here in CO) and step back or leave.The idea that white voters are being disenfrachised is laughable and I know you know that. Perform for the monkeys, but don't think you're fooling me Damo.
And I really think it's beyond sad that in the year 2010 racism is still so vile (as evidenced by the racists threats which you can find at the link), and that suppression of the minority vote is being attempted on such a wide scale.
And when you cover for racists, what are you?
Cover? I told a story related to another, that isn't "covering".
I'm sure all Damo is doing is trying to "stimulate the debate."
Job well done, Damo. Keep up the good work.
Again, a story from me isn't a defense of poll watchers who would violate the privacy of a voter.Now a personal story against DECADES of cheating by the republicans that keep them tied to a consent decree that the courts refuse to remove because of constant infractions by the republican party.
Damo the republican party has worked for decades to keep poor people from voting and the Courts document it.
Dear idiot, are you going to pretend the BP have a consent decree against them for CHEATING in elections for the last 30 years?
The republican party has worked to CHEAT poor voters out of their vote for decades now and the court has caught them repetedly.
Thanks. Although I know you are being facetious, it isn't unrealistic to expect even you and Darla to look at what I said rather than project what you expect onto my posts. I do often say things that I think would be taken as borderline to get people talking on slow days, but this isn't one of them.I'm sure all Damo is doing is trying to "stimulate the debate."
Job well done, Damo. Keep up the good work.
Thanks. Although I know you are being facetious, it isn't unrealistic to expect even you and Darla to look at what I said rather than project what you expect onto my posts. I do often say things that I think would be taken as borderline to get people talking on slow days, but this isn't one of them.
At the last election (2008) we had D Poll Watchers who, for the first time since I've been working the polls I had never had a challenge before 2008 in a good 18 years worth of being an Election Judge, would challenge about 40% of the voters who were lined up, every one of them who were challenged were Rs who supposedly had "moved". I had to have them fill out a challenge sheet before they voted, some of them got frustrated and left, spoiling their ballot.
Do you even fucking care your party cheats its ass off?
1. Small town, dude.A few questions:
(1) How did the poll watchers know the voters were Republicans?
(2) Why didn't you just give the challenged voters provisional ballots and determine their eligibility to vote at your polling location at a later time?
(3) While I find it hard to believe, I have no reason to doubt your story but it is by no means representative of anything other than your personal experience and it by no means discounts the very real history of minority vote suppression.
1. Small town, dude.
2. Because if they fill out the challenge sheet, they don't have to vote provisionally. A challenge sheet basically states, "This is my address, I am supposed to vote here, I am registered here." The office of the Secretary of State is then obligated to check if there was reason to suspect fraud. They then vote the regular ballot and put it into the regular count.
3. It was real.
In our county, politics are not hard to determine. 70% of the people are registered republican, almost everybody is active. It is very easy to determine who isn't part of your political party.Small town? Really?
I live in a small town, and I was born in a small town, and I can breathe in a small town...but that doesn't change the fact that 90% of people are pretty private about how they vote.
I said that some of them didn't want the hassle and left, spoiling their ballots.Right, but you said they left and spoiled their ballots. That makes no sense. At worst, they could have cast provisional ballots if they didn't want to answer the questions.
And how long does it take to answer five questions and take an oath? Can't take more than a minute or two.
Small town? Really?
I live in a small town, and I was born in a small town, and I can breathe in a small town...but that doesn't change the fact that 90% of people are pretty private about how they vote.