DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

mandatory blood draws, are they constitutional?

  • No, it violates my rights as a person

    Votes: 24 88.9%
  • yes, they are clearly constitutional

    Votes: 3 11.1%

  • Total voters
    27
I disrespect people like you who disrespect the founders while claiming you're the one following what they say.

You're a whining anarchist that dislikes anything government. You do know what anarchy means don't you. It doesn't sound like it.

you are a clueless twit when it comes to the founders. you're just like a liberal in regards to the constitution. you dont fucking like it so you make shit up to make you feel good.
 
Apparently, you haven't read this Amendment very well, especially that part concerning THE PEOPLE.

THE PEOPLE are the ones who created the driver's license laws and the drunk driving laws. That was the RIGHT of the PEOPLE.

Again, we don't live in a monarchy.

Apparently you live under the delusion the the US is not an oligarchy.
I guess that isn't covered in jr. College.
TFF that you are impressed with your paralegal status.
 
That begs the question. Are you suggesting that there is a single state in the union where you can drive a car WITHOUT a driver's license? I haven't been to every state but I have a pretty strong feeling that they all require driver's licenses, so the question of CAN has been answered. As far as a constitution saying it CAN or CAN'T do anything, I think you'll find the answer in that section of any constitution that provides for a legislature. If a state's constitution provides for a legislature, then it CAN legislate traffic statutes. So far, I'm only aware specifically of two states that require driver's licenses: North Carolina and Florida. And this is because I held a driver's license, first in one then the other.



A court case where driving a car on a highway is a right? Not having the ability to travel, but actually driving a car? In Florida and North Carolina, driving is called a privilege. That much I know for a fact. If you're going to suggest some left wing shithole like New York or Califagula says driving is a privilege, I wouldn't doubt it. Those places are as fucked as a hooker on a Saturday night.




Are there any states that are prohibited to charge a license fee? Can you name them? Can you prove it with a link to their statutes?



Most cops today are the reason you're able to walk the streets without worrying about being mugged. They're the reason you can drive the streets and not worry about getting run off the road. They are normal decent people just like you think you are. They're just doing a job. A lot of them are supporting families and paying taxes. Comparing most of them to concentration camp officials is as despicable as it is ignorant.

How does cop dick taste?
 
You hate the police and anything they do is wrong in your eyes. When you're that biased, what you say becomes invalid. It's considered talking shit then.

As for jury nullification, it amounts to nothing more than people like you because you don't LIKE or AGREE with something, you can refuse to apply it. It amounts to nothing more than a whining anarchist thinking laws passed by duly chosen elected body shouldn't be applied because you don't want to.

Really, so neither of you jr. Statist badge blowers even believe in jury nullification but we are supposed to listen to the opinions you pull out of your assholes?
I think not.
Suck off another cop.
 
Paralegal degree. Uh, yeah. I know what it is. If you're thinking that a jury on a simple murder trial can find a guilty murderer innocent and then at the same time announce that a Supreme Court Justice will be removed from the bench, then some contaminants have found their way into your water. Oh, and Jury nullification is STILL only at the discretion of any judge, who can overturn a jury verdict without blinking an eye.



Just out of curiosity, (and I'm not necessarily saying there is anything wrong with this, I'm just curious) are you suggesting that in the future a DUI checkpoint can be morally upended by the force of armed rebellion? Any other time I would think such a thing would be ludicrous, but already the BLACK LIVES MATTER cabal has made inroads into armed rebellion. Those animals might actually bring your dream to fruition, so it isn't totally out of the question.



It's a right that can be punished. And a jury verdict that a judge disapproves of can easily be set aside. Judges have the power to quash a verdict that in their opinion didn't follow the law.




If you want to make the point that police officers are human and occasionally make mistakes, you won't get any argument from me. If you want to make the point that there are some bad police officers who often violate the law for reasons of corruption, racism, or just plan assholery, you won't get any argument from me.

If you're suggesting that ALL cops are corrupt based on the actions of the few, I'll wait patiently for you to make the case that because one black man committed a crime, ALL blacks are criminals. I'll wait for you to tell me that because ONE woman got pregnant out of wedlock, ALL women are sluts.

I'm sure you see how that works. Bigotry and prejudice are items that cover a very broad spectrum, not just the politically correct groups.

LMFAO.
Moron; even a real paralegal with an actual 2 year degree
would know that no judge can EVER overturn an aquital by a jury. IDIOT.
ONLY GUILTY FINDINGS CAN BE OVERTURNE BY A JUDGE.
JURY NULLIFICATION IS INVIOLABLE.

Now, since you have proven you are a statist cocksucker ignorant of our most basic legal rights Shut the fuck up.
 
In the mid-90s I got to know some true Libertarians. They were all talking about some sort of "informed jury amendment" as if that would be the cure-all to oppressive government. I'm thinking that's kinda what we have here.

No.
What we have here is two fools who are clueless.
 
Most cops today are the reason you're able to walk the streets without worrying about being mugged. They're the reason you can drive the streets and not worry about getting run off the road. They are normal decent people just like you think you are. They're just doing a job. A lot of them are supporting families and paying taxes. Comparing most of them to concentration camp officials is as despicable as it is ignorant.

your ignorance knows no bounds, it seems. are there no more muggings in this country? anywhere? are there incidents of vehicular violence anywhere? I GUARANTEE that in 99.99% of the incidents out there, a cop will back up another cop even if that cop is clearly in the wrong. that thin blue line makes it so. there have been several posts on this forum that bear out when a GOOD cop outs a bad cop, that good cop doesn't last very long because they crossed that line. pull your conservative crap head out of your shit filled ass.

Oh, and Jury nullification is STILL only at the discretion of any judge, who can overturn a jury verdict without blinking an eye.
you are NOT a paralegal. if you were, you'd know that a judge can only overturn a jury verdict of guilty. a judge cannot overturn an acquittal. and while the judge can do what they want in regards to nullification, they are powerless to stop it once it's happened. the federal courts have made that issue very clear when they tried to charge a juror for doing just that and the fed court said 'no'.
 
Moron; even a real paralegal with an actual 2 year degree
would know that no judge can EVER overturn an aquital by a jury. IDIOT.
I never said a judge could overturn an acquittal. I said a judge could overturn a verdict. Oh, and verdicts aren't just subject to guilty or innocent. A judge can overturn a huge jury settlement in a coffee in the crotch lawsuit.

Try to keep up with the rest of the class.

Now, since you have proven you are a statist cocksucker ignorant of our most basic legal rights Shut the fuck up.

All I've proven is that you're wrong and you don't like being proven wrong. It brings out the worst in you.
 
your ignorance knows no bounds, it seems. are there no more muggings in this country? anywhere? are there incidents of vehicular violence anywhere? I GUARANTEE that in 99.99% of the incidents out there, a cop will back up another cop even if that cop is clearly in the wrong. that thin blue line makes it so. there have been several posts on this forum that bear out when a GOOD cop outs a bad cop, that good cop doesn't last very long because they crossed that line. pull your conservative crap head out of your shit filled ass.

We get it. You hate men in uniform. You hate cops. Some cop was mean to you as a kid and you blame all cops. Got it.


you are NOT a paralegal. if you were, you'd know that a judge can only overturn a jury verdict of guilty. a judge cannot overturn an acquittal. and while the judge can do what they want in regards to nullification, they are powerless to stop it once it's happened. the federal courts have made that issue very clear when they tried to charge a juror for doing just that and the fed court said 'no'.

First of all, I never said I was a paralegal. I said I had a paralegal degree. (Didn't really want to work for a lawyer. They are mostly assholes.) Secondly, I never said a judge could overturn an acquittal. I said judges can overturn verdicts. They can overturn guilty verdicts. They can overturn huge settlements to deep pocket plaintiffs. They have that power.

Try to pay attention to what I'm actually trying to say, rather than put in your own ideas. My ideas are right anyway. Your ideas are as fucked as a hooker on Valentine's Day.
 
Apparently you live under the delusion the the US is not an oligarchy.
I guess that isn't covered in jr. College.
TFF that you are impressed with your paralegal status.

The United States is a Representative Republic. That's the legal definition. Some people's opinion claim it's an oligarchy, mostly because some people are losers who have nothing better to do with their lives. If you fit that description, feel free to feel insulted. It was meant as such.

As far as my paralegal status, it has been years since I graduated with that degree and changed my major to business and got another degree. (Didn't want to work with lawyers. Most of them are assholes, kind of like you.)

Thing is, you're kind of a space cadet here with your anarchistic views. None of them are at all well thought out. It's as if you're just offended that so few people agree with you, so you think all cops are bad, all traffic laws are unjust and everyone is out to get you.

There's a very fine cure for your problem. It's called powering down that computer, getting off your fat ass, getting a job and getting a life.

Give it about a month and some brains might actually start to grow in that coconut on your shoulders.

Then again, maybe not. You might just be an incurably stupid asshole with no hope of improvement.

I'm optimistic but you could prove me wrong and remain an asshole.
 
The United States is a Representative Republic. That's the legal definition. Some people's opinion claim it's an oligarchy, mostly because some people are losers who have nothing better to do with their lives. If you fit that description, feel free to feel insulted. It was meant as such.

As far as my paralegal status, it has been years since I graduated with that degree and changed my major to business and got another degree. (Didn't want to work with lawyers. Most of them are assholes, kind of like you.)

Thing is, you're kind of a space cadet here with your anarchistic views. None of them are at all well thought out. It's as if you're just offended that so few people agree with you, so you think all cops are bad, all traffic laws are unjust and everyone is out to get you.

There's a very fine cure for your problem. It's called powering down that computer, getting off your fat ass, getting a job and getting a life.

Give it about a month and some brains might actually start to grow in that coconut on your shoulders.

Then again, maybe not. You might just be an incurably stupid asshole with no hope of improvement.

I'm optimistic but you could prove me wrong and remain an asshole.

I already proved you wrong you lying piece if shit.
You said jury nullification doesn't work because a judge can overturn a verdict.
Stupid claim since jury nullification would never lead to a guilty verdict.
You have outed yourself as a.lying blowhard. STFU
No one is paying attention to your lies.
 
you are a clueless twit when it comes to the founders. you're just like a liberal in regards to the constitution. you dont fucking like it so you make shit up to make you feel good.

I've read what you posted. Seems that's you. The sad part is you don't realize it.
 
Back
Top