DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

[Truth Detector]

Show me where they said it was OK to drive drunk.

You don't have the right to do so despite how selfish you may be.

No one is making that argument. We call this a.........

 

[CFM]

victimless crimes are not crimes

Yet you call it a crime. What a fucking dumbass.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I didn't say Government; I said the Supreme Court. They do have final say in the interpretation of the Constitution and laws that may be contrary to it. I never said they were perfect; but then, neither are you.

they cannot possibly be the final arbiter of the constitution if the constitution defines their limitations. we the people are the final arbiter because it is OUR document.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Your unwillingness to be a man and admit you think it's OK to drive drunk is obvious.

I doubt you'd care if you entire family was killed by a drunk driver.

your unwillingness to be honest and objective is apparent.............that makes you a child.

 

[CFM]

again, you show zero understanding of how constitutions and government power works.............why is that? did you go to public schools????????

you appear to be unable to distinguish between that which is not OK and that which is not illegal/constitutional............why is that?

I, as the founders did, fully understand your right to drink and drive doesn't exist.

Did you get past the first grade?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No one is making that argument. We call this a.........

thank you..................been trying to say that, but my Libertarianism appears to be making some people deaf and blind

 

[CFM]

your unwillingness to be honest and objective is apparent.............that makes you a child.

I'm being objective and honest. You're being selfish like spoiled child. Did your mommy not let you suck her tits as long as you wanted? You wife lets me.

 

[CFM]

thank you..................been trying to say that, but my Libertarianism appears to be making some people deaf and blind

You're not a Libertarian. You're an anarchist.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I, as the founders did, fully understand your right to drink and drive doesn't exist.

Did you get past the first grade?

YOU don't understand rights...............obviously. you also don't understand limited government powers...............obviously.

 

[Nordberg]

they cannot possibly be the final arbiter of the constitution if the constitution defines their limitations. we the people are the final arbiter because it is OUR document.

That is the function of the supremes. They rule on whether laws and actions are constitutional. That requires interpretation since it is not precise. There is not even agreement among the judges. it is not settled by the people.

 

[CFM]

No one is making that argument. We call this a.........

STY is. He simply isn't man enough to admit it.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I'm being objective and honest. You're being selfish like spoiled child. Did your mommy not let you suck her tits as long as you wanted? You wife lets me.

behold, all here, see my victory as CFM is reduced to infantile remarks because he can't defeat my facts and logic.

 

[CFM]

YOU don't understand rights...............obviously. you also don't understand limited government powers...............obviously.

You don't understand what the founders, and I, believe(d).

You don't have a right to drive drunk. PERIOD.

 

[CFM]

behold, all here, see my victory as CFM is reduced to infantile remarks because he can't defeat my facts and logic.

You have no facts and logic. You're a spoiled brat. That's a sign of poor upbringing.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

That is the function of the supremes. They rule on whether laws and actions are constitutional. That requires interpretation since it is not precise. There is not even agreement among the judges. it is not settled by the people.

reading EXACT wording of the constitution does NOT require interpretation. That is the brainwashing that the government has inflicted upon you. If you cannot understand the simple wording of the constitution, you've failed as an American.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

STY is. He simply isn't man enough to admit it.

No, i'm not, infant.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You don't understand what the founders, and I, believe(d).

You don't have a right to drive drunk. PERIOD.

here's your problem, you THINK you know what the founders believed.....you obviously don't. show us where the founders stated nobody has a right to drive a horse drawn carriage while drinking............................should we wait?

 

[Truth Detector]

they cannot possibly be the final arbiter of the constitution if the constitution defines their limitations. we the people are the final arbiter because it is OUR document.

Really? Then who is? YOU?

 

[Truth Detector]

That is the function of the supremes. They rule on whether laws and actions are constitutional. That requires interpretation since it is not precise. There is not even agreement among the judges. it is not settled by the people.

We have finally found some common ground. Yay you! First thing you have gotten right here.

 

[Truth Detector]

STY is. He simply isn't man enough to admit it.

No, he isn't making that argument. But he is an anarchist who believes that the Constitution does not prohibit someone from dong anything he feels like.