DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends
- Thread starter SmarterthanYou
- Start date
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Really? Then who is? YOU?
we the people are, via the jury box. that's not too difficult for you, right?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
But he is an anarchist who believes that the Constitution does not prohibit someone from dong anything he feels like.
that's simply not true
SmarterthanYou
rebel
So the constitutionality of our laws are decided by jury?
yes............otherwise any gun law that a judge likes would be constitutional............which could mean ALL gun laws are legal. why is that hard for you to understand?
I believe it is based on your history here. I like you, but sometimes you are way out there.
That makes ZERO sense. If the MOBS were to decide, there would be no guns period.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I believe it is based on your history here. I like you, but sometimes you are way out there.
have you always considered limited and restricted government as 'out there'? because thats' all I believe
SmarterthanYou
rebel
That makes ZERO sense. If the MOBS were to decide, there would be no guns period.
that's not true either. with guns, we can defend our rights............without them, we are subject to the mob.
I am absolutely with you on that. The difference is, you're more like a NO Government and NO regulations guy.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I am absolutely with you on that. The difference is, you're more like a NO Government and NO regulations guy.
that's just your perception. Our lines are in different areas is all. I err on the side of freedom.
Are you going to shoot everyone who tries to confiscate your guns? I prefer to let the Supreme Court interpret that right so States cannot pass such laws. But we also have found that unlimited access is also a bad idea. aka the 1930s.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
well, are you determining the right to bear arms based upon the governments attempt to prohibit alcohol? there's a reason why prohibition was repealed and the amplification of black market enterprises. But the Supreme Court did decide that blacks couldn't be citizens or they'd have 2nd Amendment rights, and they did decide that interning japanese americans was constitutional because of national security, and they did decide that abortion was indeed a federally guaranteed right....................is that the court you want determining our gun rights? and yes, i'm shooting anyone that comes for my guns, no matter how many cops I have to kill..........that you wouldn't calls your adherence to the constitution into question.
No, he isn't making that argument. But he is an anarchist who believes that the Constitution does not prohibit someone from dong anything he feels like.
Post #250 - NOTHING in the constitution . . . nor does it give the government the power to prohibit dangerous actions. It ONLY gives it the power to punish the results of dangerous actions.
What he's saying is that the government shouldn't be able to prohibit people from driving drunk only punish them is the results of that action cause harm. In other words, he believes it's OK to drive drunk.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
Your problem is you think you do. Typical uneducated, arrogant asshole that is still mad he got a dishonorable discharge from the military because they wouldn't let him do what he wanted.
The country would be better off if you suffered a friend fire "accident"
I understand English and freedoms far better than you. I'm not the one that thinks anything I want to do is OK because I want to do it. If you think so, bring your ass to where I am, try to enter my house without permission, and see what rights I exercise.