DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

[Into the Night]

I'm not questioning who drove. You said he didn't drive because he was "somewhat shitfaced" which means his judgment was impaired. Why is it so hard for you to answer why if he was too impaired to drive he could be rational enough to make a judgment like the one you say he made. He can't be impaired and not impaired at the same time. Thinking he can is a progressive mentality.

Repetitious distortions and contextomy fallacies (RDCF). Repetitious questions asked that were already answered (RQAA).

 

[Into the Night]

You'd need some balls which you clearly don't have. You've talked like you had them but they're actually nothing more than shriveled prunes from a lifetime of cowardice living.

YALIFNAP

 

[Into the Night]

So you pissed off the police, got held for a bit, and you blame the police?

What a doofus.

He didn't. He did. He does.

 

[RB 60]

He is trying to condemn your passenger for being legal.

He's too stupid to understand that I drove so he could drink.

 

[Into the Night]

A safety and welfare issue (the general welfare of the community) does not require probable cause, as you well know. SCOTUS disagrees with you.

Yes it does. Otherwise the community is not safe. SCOTUS has no say in the matter.

 

[Into the Night]

Sobriety checkpoints are checking for drunk drivers you fucking idiot.

...by stopping legal drivers (most drivers) and searching their cars, and harassing the driving public. It is unconstitutional to establish such checkpoints.

The Constitution doesn't say you can drive drunk. I don't know of any State that says you can.

Compositional error fallacy involving people as the class: bigotry. You just assumed all drivers are drunk.

I hope a drunk driver hits your damn family, the doors can't be opened, and the car catches fire.

I already told you, dumbass. I've already been hit by drunk drivers.

 

[Into the Night]

I understand you don't have the freedom to drive drunk and his argument is that you can and not be punished until you hurt/kill an innocent person.

Where does the Constitution protect you entering my house without permission? My State's laws are clear about what can happen to you if you do.

Contextomy fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Not an insult if it's true and I wish he had suffered from a friendly fire accident.

Lie. Insult fallacy. There is no 'true' or 'false' to an insult.

 

[Into the Night]

I speak for the founders when the founders spoke the same way. I'll speak for you, too, and there isn't a goddamn thing you can do about it.

You don't get to speak for anyone except yourself.

 

[Into the Night]

Are you calling the founders idiots?

Contextomy fallacy. You apparently have some real issues with reading comprehension.

 

[Into the Night]

He doesn't support the Constitution. He supports what he wants it to say not what it says.

Lie. You deny the Constitution of the United States. Inversion fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Sobriety checkpoints check for drunk drivers, idiot.

RDCF. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

So you're mommy didn't let you suck her tits long enough either, huh?

YALIFNAP

 

[Into the Night]

One is legal and one is not.

Contextomy fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Can't answer a simple question, huh?

None asked. Contextomy fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

That's not the assumption at all. That's an excuse for those of you that think it's OK for someone to drive drunk.

RDCF.

 

[Into the Night]

Not unwarranted at all nor an investigation.

It is unwarranted. It is an investigation. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Just like the others, for those that think it's OK to drive drunk and piss/moan about such things, I hope you're family members are the next victims WHEN it happens.

Insult fallacies. RDCF.

 

[Into the Night]

It's neither, fuckhead. Learn what words mean.

I'm not in a popularity contest. Don't care if a bunch of whiny drunks get pissed at me because I don't want to see INNOCENT people killed because they think it's OK to drive after drinking.

Try English. It works better.
RDCF

 

[Into the Night]

you should take your own fucking advice, because you CLAIM to know what the founders meant, but can't produce their words.....................

The founders are irrelevant to the conversation here. The Constitution of the United States is the fact at hand in this argument. It is the only reference to the Constitution of the United States. He is trying to use the founders as the reference of the Constitution of the United States. It is a false authority.

 

[Into the Night]

He's too stupid to understand that I drove so he could drink.

Obviously.

Thanks for your contribution to everyone's safety.