DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

mandatory blood draws, are they constitutional?

  • No, it violates my rights as a person

    Votes: 24 88.9%
  • yes, they are clearly constitutional

    Votes: 3 11.1%

  • Total voters
    27
every post you make far surpasses any i could ever make, with your dumbfuckery. anyone who needs the government to explain to them what the constitution means, is a failure as an american. any moron who claims that ONLY exact wording in the said constitution is the only thing that matters, then tries to use concepts to explain that exact wording is a total fucking idiot. That would be you, since you're too stupid to understand basic english.

"Vehicles cannot be necessary".

I still get a great laugh out of the stupidest post of all time. The gift that keeps on giving.

:rofl2:
 
"Vehicles cannot be necessary".

I still get a great laugh out of the stupidest post of all time. The gift that keeps on giving.

:rofl2:

you gotta be tired of being such a moron, right? how can you not understand that what I said is absolute FACT??????? your slavish mindset to mommy government is ridiculous. but by all means, keep entertaining us with your idiocy, moron.
 
I'll have put this on my calendar. I actually agree with domer. Use of public roadways is not a Constitutional right. It's a privilege.
WRONG. It is your right to use public roads.
If you want to use public roads, you are subject to rules.
Standards, actually. But you have the right to use public roads.
I strongly disagree with the concept of DUI checkpoints, but I concede that they are Constitutional.
No. They violate the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 16th amendments.
 
you gotta be tired of being such a moron, right? how can you not understand that what I said is absolute FACT??????? your slavish mindset to mommy government is ridiculous. but by all means, keep entertaining us with your idiocy, moron.

Right. Vehicles cannot be necessary in a modern society because we can still function with horse and buggies.

What a fucking clown! You make me laugh!

:rofl2:
 
Right. Vehicles cannot be necessary in a modern society because we can still function with horse and buggies.

What a fucking clown! You make me laugh!

:rofl2:

says the total fucking moron who doesn't know what inalienable means.................you're a failure as an American. go sit the fuck down.
 
WRONG. It is your right to use public roads.

Standards, actually. But you have the right to use public roads.

No. They violate the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 16th amendments.

It's about DRIVING, dumbfuck.

You must be pretending to be this stupid. Nobody can be consistently as idiotic as you post.

Constitutional, bitch. 1990. 6-3

LSMFT. :rofl2:
 
It's about DRIVING, dumbfuck.

You must be pretending to be this stupid. Nobody can be consistently as idiotic as you post.

Constitutional, bitch. 1990. 6-3

LSMFT. :rofl2:

if you need the courts to tell you your rights and what the constitution means, you're a total failure as an American.
 
Did you forget the Amish? They function with nothing more than horse and buggy.

Yeah. In one small part of the country. A local guy sells Amish furniture. How the fuck do you think he got it all the way across the country? Horse and buggy?

The saga of your stupidity continues.

LSMFT

:rofl2:
 

so you don't know, yet you think you can tell me that I don't get to decide? you are a failed American. go back to school, moron.

I get to decide my rights, vehicles are NOT necessary unless people have a RIGHT to drive them. WE wrote the constitution, and the government doesn't get to decide it's own limitations and powers.
 
Yeah. In one small part of the country. A local guy sells Amish furniture. How the fuck do you think he got it all the way across the country? Horse and buggy?

The saga of your stupidity continues.

LSMFT

:rofl2:

do you have a right to drive a vehicle???? a simple yes or no will suffice, otherwise you're just talking out your ass, failed american.
 
Back
Top