DUI checkpoints and 'no refusal' weekends

[Into the Night]

It's about DRIVING, dumbfuck.

No, it isn't. It's about stopping cars indiscriminately and assuming guilt before innocence as well as search without cause or warrant, fishing for self incriminating statements. It's about the violation of the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 14th amendments.

You must be pretending to be this stupid. Nobody can be consistently as idiotic as you post.

Inversion fallacy.

Constitutional, bitch. 1990. 6-3

SCOTUS does not have authority to change the Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

The road wasn't closed and there was no examination.

The road was closed. You could not pass until examined by police.

 

[Into the Night]

Stops are constitutional.

Nope. They violate the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 14th amendments.

Reasonable searches.

It is not reasonable to search every car because ONE of them might have a drunk driver.

1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990).

SCOTUS does not have authority to change the Constitution.

Your judgement doesn't mean shit. Tell it to the judge.

Yes it does. The judge can blow it out his left nostril. He doesn't have the required authority to make such a ruling.

 

[Into the Night]

Yeah. In one small part of the country. A local guy sells Amish furniture. How the fuck do you think he got it all the way across the country? Horse and buggy?

The saga of your stupidity continues.

LSMFT

Are you sure it's Amish? Are you sure the trucker didn't buy it from the Amish to sell it in your local area?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Yes it does. The judge can blow it out his left nostril. He doesn't have the required authority to make such a ruling.

domer will never be able to acknowledge anything other than he is a slave to the state and needs the government, via the courts/judges, to tell him what he can and cannot do. he is not capable of logical thought nor any sense of rationality when it concerns the founders, freedom, or the constitution. he's simply a failed American.

 

[domer76]

so you don't know, yet you think you can tell me that I don't get to decide? you are a failed American. go back to school, moron.

I get to decide my rights, vehicles are NOT necessary unless people have a RIGHT to drive them. WE wrote the constitution, and the government doesn't get to decide it's own limitations and powers.

You get to decide your rights?

Just fucking hilarious!

Second in stupidity only to "vehicles cannot be necessary" in a modern society.

You didn't write any fucking Constitution, you fucking idiot. Those that did are long gone.

Fucking clown.

 

[domer76]

do you have a right to drive a vehicle???? a simple yes or no will suffice, otherwise you're just talking out your ass, failed american.

"Vehicles cannot be necessary"

Priceless!

 

[domer76]

No, it isn't. It's about stopping cars indiscriminately and assuming guilt before innocence as well as search without cause or warrant, fishing for self incriminating statements. It's about the violation of the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 14th amendments.

Inversion fallacy.

SCOTUS does not have authority to change the Constitution.

Gotta drive a car to get stopped at a roadblock, idiot. They don't get there by themselves.

Constitutional. 1990. 6-3

LSMFT.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You get to decide your rights?

Just fucking hilarious!

Second in stupidity only to "vehicles cannot be necessary" in a modern society.

You didn't write any fucking Constitution, you fucking idiot. Those that did are long gone.

Fucking clown.

you're a failed american. as such, your opinion means jack shit. you've always been wrong.

 

[domer76]

Nope. They violate the 4th, 5th, 10th, and 14th amendments.

It is not reasonable to search every car because ONE of them might have a drunk driver.

SCOTUS does not have authority to change the Constitution.

Yes it does. The judge can blow it out his left nostril. He doesn't have the required authority to make such a ruling.

Constitutional. 1990. 6-3

Forum moron.

LSMFT.

 

[domer76]

Are you sure it's Amish? Are you sure the trucker didn't buy it from the Amish to sell it in your local area?

Whoosh!

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Constitutional. 1990. 6-3

Failed American

 

[domer76]

Failed American

Tell it to SCOTUS, clown.

Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Tell it to SCOTUS, clown.

Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)

failed american, needs your master to tell you what you can and cannot do. you should actually love trump, if you say he's such a dictator. failed american.

 

[domer76]

failed american, needs your master to tell you what you can and cannot do. you should actually love trump, if you say he's such a dictator. failed american.

Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Tell it to SCOTUS, clown.

Stops are constitutional. Reasonable searches. 1990 SCOTUS. 6-3. Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990)

Can you be stopped by law enforcement to check if you have a drivers license, if you've broken no traffic laws????????

 

[Into the Night]

domer will never be able to acknowledge anything other than he is a slave to the state and needs the government, via the courts/judges, to tell him what he can and cannot do. he is not capable of logical thought nor any sense of rationality when it concerns the founders, freedom, or the constitution. he's simply a failed American.

He has already made several paradoxes that he has never cleared. He continues to argue both sides of them irrationally. He seems to be completely illiterate to governmental structures, the Constitution of the United States, his own state constitution, and roll and authority of law enforcement or the judicial system on any level of government. He has already referred to most people living in his States as 'deplorables'.

He is bound by his own illiteracy, just as surely is if he were bound in chains.

 

[Into the Night]

You get to decide your rights?

Just fucking hilarious!

Second in stupidity only to "vehicles cannot be necessary" in a modern society.

You didn't write any fucking Constitution, you fucking idiot. Those that did are long gone.

Fucking clown.

No constitution gives rights. Rights do not come from a constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

Gotta drive a car to get stopped at a roadblock, idiot. They don't get there by themselves.

Irrelevance fallac.

Constitutional. 1990. 6-3

Repetition fallacy. You are chanting. SCOTUS does not have authority to change the Constitution.

 

[Into the Night]

Constitutional. 1990. 6-3

Forum moron.

LSMFT.

Repetitive chant worshipping the Supreme Court (RCWSC).