To you maybe. To me it means something.
Who knows? Maybe we're not at the end yet?I'm dissapointed that Cthulhu didn't appear and eat it all at the end.
I agree. People often ponder "the meaning of life," but this is a pointless endeavor. Life is meaningless. And even if there is a god, who says it is benevolent? Look at the world around us. Murder, war, terrorism, rape, etc. If there is a god, it is obviously a sadist.
No, I am sorry... TO YOU, life is meaningless. To a great many other people, life is certainly NOT meaningless.
And... you don't believe in God because God isn't stopping man from killing man? Seriously???
If you witnessed someone attempting to murder another person, you would surely intervene, correct? That is the moral thing to do. The same principle would apply to a benevolent god. The fact that there is violence in the world demonstrates that there probably is no god. If there is a god, he's got to be a pretty big douche.
Why would an omnipotent God have the need to adhere to YOUR concept of morality? Can you articulate?
Why would an omnipotent God have the need to adhere to YOUR concept of morality? Can you articulate?
You think it's moral to allow someone to, say, rape a child, when they have the ability to stop it?
"Someone," perhaps, but God is not a "someone." Now I do suppose, if whenever bad people did something bad, they just *zap* disappeared in a flash, like they flew into a bug zapper, many more people would believe in God. However, then we wouldn't really have "free will." There is no such thing as "good" if bad no longer exists. There is no such thing as "moral" if "immoral" doesn't exist. You and I are humans, mortal beings, we have a distinct structure of morality known as "humanity" which is unique to our species. God is not a human, and therefore, has no need for human attributes.
Why would an omnipotent god create such a mess as humans?
The concept of free will is balderdash.