Economic Populism

Damocles said:
You can't prove it in the case of your own Grandmother. Prove she didn't write it.

The table is dry, so you spit on it and shout, "SEE!"
Click to expand...

You rabidly defend these sociopaths, as if you know, as if it's impossible because nobody told you.
 
AssHatZombie said:
You just choose to not believe that "one navy dude". You put up. You cannot prove he didn't write it. And the alleged impossibility of proving negatives will not save you this time.
Click to expand...
You simply choose to believe anything regardless of any requirement of evidence.
 
AssHatZombie said:
You rabidly defend these sociopaths, as if you know, as if it's impossible because nobody told you.
Click to expand...
You believe that they are sociopaths because you choose to believe with no evidence to back up the assertions of the people who say that they are evil.
 
since those sociopaths made out country and constitution ...well what should we give it back to England or the indians ?
 
People just expect me to sit there and let people call me evil for some reason.

I have never been for globalism. I don't want a one world government. I have never met a Freemason who does want such a thing to happen. I am sure there are some that exist as we have people with pretty much any opinion. However the idea that Freemasons somehow all believe the same thing is preposterous. We don't even all have the same religion.
 
Damocles said:
People just expect me to sit there and let people call me evil for some reason.

I have never been for globalism. I don't want a one world government. I have never met a Freemason who does want such a thing to happen. I am sure there are some that exist as we have people with pretty much any opinion. However the idea that Freemasons somehow all believe the same thing is preposterous. We don't even all have the same religion.
Click to expand...

You don't have to sit, bark at the moon, wild brother!

Im glad you're not for globalism. Any group where political discussion is forbidden sounds brainwashy to me.
 
all the world becoming one big family is the only way to have peace. Being segmented all over the place causes wars.
 
AssHatZombie said:
You don't have to sit, bark at the moon, wild brother!

Im glad you're not for globalism. Any group where political discussion is forbidden sounds brainwashy to me.
Click to expand...
It is only "forbidden" during business meetings. In which business meeting do you discuss politics and religion?

The only "penalty" is to be removed from the meeting. It sounds like any other place of business.
 
Brilliant!

uscitizen said:
all the world becoming one big family is the only way to have peace. Being segmented all over the place causes wars.
Click to expand...

Right out of the Marxist doctrine...what about large cities... gang wars and such...and hey they are one big happy family!...Wars would continue regardless of a New World Order ...maybe in the year 2525 when and if man is still alive...and we have another galaxy to fight the New World Order could work...until then it will continue like it or not...a rebellion would soon appear against the New World Order...thats a fact Jack!
 
uscitizen said:
all the world becoming one big family is the only way to have peace. Being segmented all over the place causes wars.
Click to expand...


But you cannot create a family by force, or by showing favoritism to some, and telling others they must bear the burden of the state of things, and accept a more grim personal future. Your "ONE BIG FAMILY" logic is a lie to fool stupid westerners.
 
uscitizen said:
"The problem people like you have is that you think within the borders of the country."

Yep SF, like it or not we are now edging into a world community/economy.
And a world economy could possibly help with world peace in some areas. After all if your food comes from a certain country would you want to bomb it ?
As I said it will help, not fix everything. Kinda like the old times when the royal families intermarried to keep peace.
Click to expand...

Check out this retarded shit.
 
the American voter is smarter than this whine and cheese crybaby shit.
2006 was due to three reasons.
1. Iraq
2. Iraq
3. Iraq
 
thanks I bet your boss at office depot brings out the same response from you.
Did you get a real job yet?
 
Topspin said:
we'll see I see the democratic leader being the most business friendly, wonder why that is?
Click to expand...

Because she has the most money and best organization. It doesnt' change the 06 exit polling, which showed, yes Iraq, but also jobs and in between those two, coming in second, corruption. Abramoff was a big deal outside of the beltway, stunning all pundits inside of the beltway.
 
I'm with the jobs and corruption etc
I'd put them at 4, 5, and 6

And in 08 they may be more important but Iraq will dominate again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top