Electric Vehicles Are Less Reliable Than Conventional Cars

I think all of this talk about Battery Powered cars overlooks the fact that Fuel Cell cars are on the horizon, and they will be end up becoming the DeFacto Standard of the future in terms of fueling the world's transportation and power plants!

The only question now becomes whether it will be Blue Hydrogen or Green Hydrogen that becomes the exclusive source. That has just become the next political infused argument

And as for, Abortion, teen pregnancies are still the highest number of abortions being performed. And only second to that, are abortions of the over 40 abortions.

Most teen pregnancies are due to statutory RAPE. and most over 40 abortions have to do with risk of danger to the mother or the baby.

SO, I just wanted to get those two facts out there.

I think most Americans agree that teens and older women should have that choice- and that include most Republicans.

But, also most Americans also realize that risk to the mother or baby can happen at any age, and Rape also happens to all ages of women, so Abortion should not be banned at all in the first or second trimester of pregnancy.

And due to the fact that risk to the mother or baby sometimes does not show up until the 3rd trimester, there should never be a ban on Abortion.

Doctors should be allowed to make these recommendations, and should be allowed to carry out the abortions. But, even after a doctor gives advice, the decision itself should be left up to the one who is pregnant- THUS A WOMAN'S CHOICE!

Not one single citation in all that pontificating.
 
In polite medical terms a Brown Stat is shitting your pants.

Toyota plans to expand battery EV line-up in Europe to 6 models by 2026

https://apple.news/AuaFdrPv9QAe6djvkWx7k5Q

The world's largest automaker by sales said in a statement it expected to sell more than 250,000 battery-powered vehicles annually in Europe by 2026, as it seeks steep growth in a market where it has long been overtaken by rivals.
On top of a battery EV the company is currently selling in Europe and a compact sports utility vehicle (SUV) concept it already showcased last year, Toyota unveiled two new concepts for models that it plans to sell in the region later this decade.
One was a concept model for a battery-powered small SUV that it plans to launch in Europe in 2024 and the other was a concept for a sports crossover model that is scheduled for introduction in 2025, Toyota said in statements.
Toyota is targeting sales of 1.5 million battery-powered vehicles a year globally by 2026.
Sales of fully electric cars in the European Union (EU) were up more than half over the first 10 months of the year compared to the same period a year earlier, data from the European Automobile Manufacturers Association showed last month.


GorgeousMisguidedIrishsetter-small.gif
 
I think all of this talk about Battery Powered cars overlooks the fact that Fuel Cell cars are on the horizon, and they will be end up becoming the DeFacto Standard of the future in terms of fueling the world's transportation and power plants!

The only question now becomes whether it will be Blue Hydrogen or Green Hydrogen that becomes the exclusive source. That has just become the next political infused argument

And as for, Abortion, teen pregnancies are still the highest number of abortions being performed. And only second to that, are abortions of the over 40 abortions.

Most teen pregnancies are due to statutory RAPE. and most over 40 abortions have to do with risk of danger to the mother or the baby.

SO, I just wanted to get those two facts out there.

I think most Americans agree that teens and older women should have that choice- and that include most Republicans.

But, also most Americans also realize that risk to the mother or baby can happen at any age, and Rape also happens to all ages of women, so Abortion should not be banned at all in the first or second trimester of pregnancy.

And due to the fact that risk to the mother or baby sometimes does not show up until the 3rd trimester, there should never be a ban on Abortion.

Doctors should be allowed to make these recommendations, and should be allowed to carry out the abortions. But, even after a doctor gives advice, the decision itself should be left up to the one who is pregnant- THUS A WOMAN'S CHOICE!


Prove that most teen abortions are a result of a statutory rape. And have an abortion to prevent danger to the baby. Does that make ANY sense to you?

88% of all US abortions are in women between 20-39 years old only 8% are in women under 20 years old. And 4% are over 40 years old.

https://www.kff.org/womens-health-p...0&sortModel={"colId":"Location","sort":"asc"}
 
Last edited:
Prove that most teen abortions are a result of a statutory rape. And have an abortion to prevent danger to the baby. Does that make ANY sense to you?

88% of all US abortions are in women between 20-39 years old only 8% are in women under 20 years old. And 4% are over 40 years old.

https://www.kff.org/womens-health-p...0&sortModel={"colId":"Location","sort":"asc"}

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/01/11/what-the-data-says-about-abortion-in-the-u-s-2/

You know really dude, what is your beef about abortions? I thought you were a man.

What right do you have in telling women what they should be forced to do with their bodies? Do you even realize how unmanly that looks to even your own wife and daughters?

You know what I think? I think your stance on Abortions has nothing to do with saving fetuses lives, or even a religious view, as I think you are just a political hack that thinks you have something over on Democrats!

But let me tell you a fact, banning abortions will never be a successful political strategy, because most men and women, in this country, believe that Abortions should be a woman's choice- regardless to their political or religious affiliations.

So, the idea of banning abortions actually becomes a detriment to winning elections in this country.

AS YOU MAY HAVE TO LEARN THE HARD WAY- By losing another major presidential election.

Since Roe Vs. Wade has been overturned by a corrupted Supreme Court, the banning of abortions will be one of the main referendums in the next presidential election!

You are only fooling yourself to think otherwise!

Fair Warning NEIGHBOR!
 
Last edited:
I do not "hate EVs." I hate that government is increasingly forcing them on people. I see an EV as the wrong type of vehicle for me, and many other people feel the same way. If the government is going to push them down the public's throats, then it is time to fight back against such dictatorial asininity.

YOu have an irrational and hysterical hate of EV's that does not even allow you think clearly.

You have a position that NOTHING has changed since 1905 and the failure of EV companies in that era, to today, that would make the EV segment more advanced and appealing to drivers today. That is such a bat shit crazy position, to not even recognize how just EV charging stations starting to dot the cities, States and Country as they spread, in the same way, and following the exact same path as Gas Stations turned ICE vehicles from fringe to mainstream. We can ignore all the other massive improvements since 1905 as denying that one is enough to highlight you hate and irrationality.


(waits for Terry to deny yet another argument he made prior)
 
What advantage(s) does the owner of an EV have over the owner of an ICE? What can the owner of an EV do that the owner of an ICE cant do?

- EV's are wayyyyy faster, p4p and some people like that, a lot.

- They are one of many initiatives leading the way to much greener future over time

- they are FARRRRRR more convenient for the vast majority of driving, the vast majority of people do, which is the work/home, ...errands/home around town without ever having to go to gas station

- they are cheaper and easier to maintain than ICE overall

- etc, etc

But the bigger issue is why do you think a person who chooses to buy an EV needs to justify it to you?

Technology changes and sometimes is advances in that change and other times it does not, but users prefer it and buy it anyway. Whether it is DVD, CDs, VHS or Beta Max, some might say 'who cares, at the end i am watching a movie with any of them' and others want the changes that come with them.
 
What advantage(s) does the owner of an EV have over the owner of an ICE? What can the owner of an EV do that the owner of an ICE cant do?

Sir, getting from point A to Point B is the same thing.

The question becomes, should there only be one way to do it?

I say, NO! I say people should have choices!
 
Actually, they do. Come California's ban on new car sales of non-EV's they won't let you buy one in another state then register it in California. The same goes if you already own a non EV that is newer than their ban year, and you move to California. Can't register your car there.

California does this by checking year model of the vehicle, and in the case of ICE cars, the year model of the engine.

States like California are going to give you no choice about things. And, it's not just cars. California bans or restricts a whole plethora of products, chemicals, etc., that are allowed in other states.

As California has already put a ban on new ICE vehicles come 2035, 11 counties in the state have already banned new gas station construction, and it's likely that the state will follow by 2035 with a ban.

Do you live in California?

If you don't, then don't soil your panties over it!

Choices! Live where you want to! LIVE AND LET LIVE! Sounds like good advice to me!
 
Like ABC

States banning the sale of new gas-powered vehicles
Several have said they plan to follow in California's footsteps.

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/states-banning-sale-gas-powered-vehicles/story?id=88895372

I am talking new ICE will be banned...new buyers will not have that choice that u stated u loved

Is Kansas or Missouri one of them?

Sir, you have choices! That is what is important!

And BTW, the comment I made about what would be allowed and not allowed, was not my comment, as that comment was made in the Reference that the OP chose to use as his reference! I cut and pasted it from his reference!

Next!
 
Last edited:
Sir, getting from point A to Point B is the same thing.

The question becomes, should there only be one way to do it?

I say, NO! I say people should have choices!

So no advantage there. Good.

There already is walking. So no advantage there either. Good.

Should they? Then why has California already passed a law to outlaw ICEs in that state by 2035? Choice must have a statute of limitations, huh?

So AGAIN there is no advantage to the owner of an EV. Thanks.
 
- EV's are wayyyyy faster, p4p and some people like that, a lot.

- They are one of many initiatives leading the way to much greener future over time

- they are FARRRRRR more convenient for the vast majority of driving, the vast majority of people do, which is the work/home, ...errands/home around town without ever having to go to gas station

- they are cheaper and easier to maintain than ICE overall

- etc, etc

But the bigger issue is why do you think a person who chooses to buy an EV needs to justify it to you?

Technology changes and sometimes is advances in that change and other times it does not, but users prefer it and buy it anyway. Whether it is DVD, CDs, VHS or Beta Max, some might say 'who cares, at the end i am watching a movie with any of them' and others want the changes that come with them.

Ok it's faster. Fair enough. That may well be an advantage to the owner.

But a person could do all that in an ICE. An EV offers no real advantage to the owner in that regard.

You have anything to bs in that up?

Etc etc ????? LMFAO ran out sooner than you expected?

I'm not asking anyone to justify their purchase of an EV you dimwitted shit stain. I want to know what advantages would there be for me to choose an EV over an ICE for my next car. As far as I can see there is one, it's faster.
 
Ok it's faster. Fair enough. That may well be an advantage to the owner.

But a person could do all that in an ICE. An EV offers no real advantage to the owner in that regard.

You have anything to bs in that up?

Etc etc ????? LMFAO ran out sooner than you expected?

I'm not asking anyone to justify their purchase of an EV you dimwitted shit stain. I want to know what advantages would there be for me to choose an EV over an ICE for my next car. As far as I can see there is one, it's faster.

So as the simpleton you are, you need OTHERS to tell you what benefits you will get, as opposed to you just deciding that for yourself? WTF???

No one is saying everyone will benefit from an EV or wants an EV. If your commute is not the typical 'work/home/errands, that consumes the vast , vast majority of most people's driving or you like having a big gasoline expense, then more power to you.

My best friend, a lawyer, bought himself an EV for his every day work driving, back and forth to the office, and he says he would never go back to gasoline for that daily drive. He also has a big pickup truck that he and his family use for trips up to their cottage on weekend, often hauling their boat or other toys back and forth.
 
So as the simpleton you are, you need OTHERS to tell you what benefits you will get, as opposed to you just deciding that for yourself? WTF???

No one is saying everyone will benefit from an EV or wants an EV. If your commute is not the typical 'work/home/errands, that consumes the vast , vast majority of most people's driving or you like having a big gasoline expense, then more power to you.

My best friend, a lawyer, bought himself an EV for his every day work driving, back and forth to the office, and he says he would never go back to gasoline for that daily drive. He also has a big pickup truck that he and his family use for trips up to their cottage on weekend, often hauling their boat or other toys back and forth.

No shit head there aren't any. If you werent a donkey dick sucking leftist retard youd see that but as it is you prefer donkey dick in your mouth
 
So no advantage there. Good.

There already is walking. So no advantage there either. Good.

Should they? Then why has California already passed a law to outlaw ICEs in that state by 2035? Choice must have a statute of limitations, huh?

So AGAIN there is no advantage to the owner of an EV. Thanks.

If that is your opinion, why are you sharting your britches over EV's?

I seriously doubt some of you knuckle-dragging Troglodyte retards are going to be around here in 2035 anyway!

The dotards are a dying breed!
 
If that is your opinion, why are you sharting your britches over EV's?

I seriously doubt some of you knuckle-dragging Troglodyte retards are going to be around here in 2035 anyway!

The dotards are a dying breed!

So once again you can't name one fucking advantage of owning a clown car.

Believe me I'll be around because pissing you maggots off is like the fountain of youth. You perpetually offended, gender confused maggots are a drain on humanity.
 
No shit head there aren't any. If you werent a donkey dick sucking leftist retard youd see that but as it is you prefer donkey dick in your mouth

There are not any FOR YOU, you fucking simple minded, idiot. Stop speaking for others when i just detailed the significant benefits OTHERS speak to.

No one gives a shit if you say 'they are not for me'. Fine.

Why the fuck do you feel you need to go on and on about OTHERS based on something not being for you?

Motorcycles are not for me. I see no benefit over getting where I need to via car. BUt i am not so stupid, like you are, that i would then argue there is no benefits to motorcycles as i know OTHERS do find some benefits in them.
 
Back
Top