You do not get an "Everything App" from a staff of 1,000. The mortgages alone would take up that many in staff.
We dont need to get, we already have.
Please do attempt to pay attention.
You do not get an "Everything App" from a staff of 1,000. The mortgages alone would take up that many in staff.
We dont need to get, we already have.
Musk's plan for making a profit is turning Twitter into an "Everything App". The Chinese have a couple of "Everything Apps", but it is not something in the USA.
Why has no one done it?
1) It is tough to build such an app. It requires a large staff in diverse fields, and Twitter is nowhere close to having that.
2) Americans consumers do not want such an app. We want to go with the best product in each category, not buy one basket of goods from one company.
3) American regulators would not agree to such a monopoly. Amazon and Google are already getting into trouble for just advancing their products in searches, imagine if they required their products as the only answer.
To the consumer, the beauty of the internet is they can go anywhere. I know that is a problem for the tech companies business plan, but that is not our problem. We simply will not use an "Everything App".
What portion of the changes made to Twitter in the last say five years before Musk bought it were good ideas?
The answer to this question might be a problem for those who think that Twitter needs a lot of humans.
For you dimwits out there I am taking no position on how many employees Twitter needs, or what would be the optimal number....I am simply reporting that I am reading various views on the subjects.
You don’t speak for everyone, Walter.
You can barely speak for yourself.
Musk has really shown the world what a socially retarded ass he is, from the time he carried a sink into Twitter HQ. It's obvious he's bored and starved for attention. He's actually destroying his brand.
They became the dominant platform in their field, which is the product of many good decisions... But their field was smaller than they would like. They probably should have gone more in the Tiktok direction. They almost did that with Vine, but Vine did 6 second videos, rather than 60 second videos, and besides, they abandoned Vine for lack of programmers to support it.
The biggest failure was the sudden loss of 50% advertising revenue, but that hit all online advertisement. There was no way around that. If they had the Twitter market, and the Tiktok market, they would still lose 50% of their revenue, but have five times as much revenue to have cut in half.
They certainly need more programmers.
You can line up and get your Twitter car insurance. I really do not care if you get ripped off.
Laying off employees in a cruel, and unthinking way becomes an issue with the employees you want to retain. The most valuable asset of any software company goes home at the end of the day. Musk has fired people without warning, and then announced they have to come back to work when he realized they were important. They might come back to work, for a little while, but they will be searching desperately for their next job.
Laying off employees in a high value employee environment is just plain difficult, and Musk has failed to do it right.
There are going to be so many of these kinds of people out of work soon, Musk will have no trouble finding better quality than what he is currently clearing out if he needs more people, even in SF.
But then you are Almost Never Right Walt, and this is Elon Musk who built both Tesla and SpaceX.
So, Walter, you admit that you don’t speak for everyone.
Think about this, only about $20 billion of his losses are directly attributable to buying Twitter, the remaining $80 billion is due to his destroying of his brand.
But then you are Almost Never Right Walt, and this is Elon Musk who built both Tesla and SpaceX.
He's a brilliant inventor. He should have "stayed in his lane". He is ill-equipped to be a media professional. He doesn't understand what or what is not funny. He has no instinct for it.