Entering your home without a warrant.

Jarod

Jarod

Well-known member
Contributor
ICE claims the right to enter your home without a warrant.

Historically and very long established caselaw says the only time the GOVERNMENT has that right is if they are in hot pursuit if a dangerous felon.



Do you Trumppers agree with ICE, that they can simply enter homes without a warrant? Is this not the type of shit we quit England over? What about the 4th Amendment?

Are you libertarians upset? @Damocles
 
Jarod said:
ICE claims the right to enter your home without a warrant.

Historically and very long established caselaw says the only time the GOVERNMENT has that right is if they are in hot pursuit if a dangerous felon.



Do you Trumppers agree with ICE, that they can simply enter homes without a warrant? Is this not the type of shit we quit England over? What about the 4th Amendment?

Are you libertarians upset? @Damocles
Click to expand...
How many times has ICE entered a home without a warrant?
 
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." United States Constitution, 4th Amendment.
 
Yakuda said:
That's entirely different than they are doing so. I would prefer no one enter my home without permission or a warrant.
Click to expand...
I looked into it, at least once... Would you prefer they not enter your home OR do you agree the Government does not have that right?


Gibson v. Bondi et al., No. 0:2026cv00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 15, 2026)

Judge: U.S. District Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan

This was a habeas corpus petition challenging Gibson's detention. The court's written opinion and order dated January 15, 2026 (Document 6 on the docket) ordered his immediate release, finding that ICE agents violated his Fourth Amendment rights by forcibly entering his home without consent and without a judicial warrant.

The opinion specifically states: "To arrest him, Respondents forcibly entered Garrison G.'s home without his consent and without a judicial warrant."

The court also found ICE violated its own regulations by failing to provide adequate notice and reasoning for revoking Gibson's order of supervision, and by not providing the required informal interview before revocation.

Notably, looking at the District of Minnesota docket around this time, there's a wave of similar habeas petitions being filed - at least a dozen cases between January 13-15, 2026, all challenging ICE detentions following the Minneapolis enforcement operations. All name either Bondi (the Attorney General), Lyons (Acting ICE Director), or Noem (DHS Secretary) as respondents.

--------------------

This appears to be the first published opinion directly ruling that entry under the May 2025 memo violates the Fourth Amendment.


There is a list of eyewitness reports of them doing just this in three or four other very recent cases.
 
Jarod said:
I looked into it, at least once... Would you prefer they not enter your home OR do you agree the Government does not have that right?


Gibson v. Bondi et al., No. 0:2026cv00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 15, 2026)

Judge: U.S. District Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan

This was a habeas corpus petition challenging Gibson's detention. The court's written opinion and order dated January 15, 2026 (Document 6 on the docket) ordered his immediate release, finding that ICE agents violated his Fourth Amendment rights by forcibly entering his home without consent and without a judicial warrant.

The opinion specifically states: "To arrest him, Respondents forcibly entered Garrison G.'s home without his consent and without a judicial warrant."

The court also found ICE violated its own regulations by failing to provide adequate notice and reasoning for revoking Gibson's order of supervision, and by not providing the required informal interview before revocation.

Notably, looking at the District of Minnesota docket around this time, there's a wave of similar habeas petitions being filed - at least a dozen cases between January 13-15, 2026, all challenging ICE detentions following the Minneapolis enforcement operations. All name either Bondi (the Attorney General), Lyons (Acting ICE Director), or Noem (DHS Secretary) as respondents.

--------------------

This appears to be the first published opinion directly ruling that entry under the May 2025 memo violates the Fourth Amendment.


There is a list of eyewitness reports of them doing just this in three or four other very recent cases.
Click to expand...
  • Hernandez Castillo v. Bondi (0:2026cv00085)
  • Astudillo Laica v. Bondi (0:2026cv00146)
  • Gavilan Cuate v. Bondi (0:2026cv00161)
  • Murillo Romero v. Bondi (0:2026cv00134)
A list of other such cases in Minnesota that have not been ruled on yet. The allegations about ICE are substantially the same.
 
Jarod said:
I looked into it, at least once... Would you prefer they not enter your home OR do you agree the Government does not have that right?


Gibson v. Bondi et al., No. 0:2026cv00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 15, 2026)


Judge: U.S. District Judge Jeffrey M. Bryan


This was a habeas corpus petition challenging Gibson's detention. The court's written opinion and order dated January 15, 2026 (Document 6 on the docket) ordered his immediate release, finding that ICE agents violated his Fourth Amendment rights by forcibly entering his home without consent and without a judicial warrant.


The opinion specifically states: "To arrest him, Respondents forcibly entered Garrison G.'s home without his consent and without a judicial warrant."


The court also found ICE violated its own regulations by failing to provide adequate notice and reasoning for revoking Gibson's order of supervision, and by not providing the required informal interview before revocation.


Notably, looking at the District of Minnesota docket around this time, there's a wave of similar habeas petitions being filed - at least a dozen cases between January 13-15, 2026, all challenging ICE detentions following the Minneapolis enforcement operations. All name either Bondi (the Attorney General), Lyons (Acting ICE Director), or Noem (DHS Secretary) as respondents.


This appears to be the first published opinion directly ruling that entry under the May 2025 memo violates the Fourth Amendment.


There are a list of eyewitness reports of them doing just this in three or four other very recent cases.
Click to expand...
The govt does all kinds of shit it might have a right to do but that doesn't make it good or just.

Eyewitnesses? LMFAO do you actually think I would have trusted that stupid bitch goode to be a reliable eyewitness? People with agendas sone make reliable eyewitnesses
 
Yakuda said:
The govt does all kinds of shit it might have a right to do but that doesn't make it good or just.

Eyewitnesses? LMFAO do you actually think I would have trusted that stupid bitch goode to be a reliable eyewitness? People with agendas sone make reliable eyewitnesses
Click to expand...
You asked if they were doing it, they are, and I am providing you links to it, and Judges orders finding they are doing it.
 
Yakuda said:
The govt does all kinds of shit it might have a right to do but that doesn't make it good or just.

Eyewitnesses? LMFAO do you actually think I would have trusted that stupid bitch goode to be a reliable eyewitness? People with agendas sone make reliable eyewitnesses
Click to expand...
Do you believe they have a right to do this? Is it okay? Is it constitutional? Is it okay with you as long as they do not do it to you?
 
Jarod said:
Yes, it has.

Gibson v. Bondi et al., No. 0:2026cv00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 15, 2026)
Click to expand...
Ok so? What should I do? Drive over to DC and tell trump to knock it off? You should have put up a better candidate for president and you could have continued to flood the country with millions of illegals but you failed.
 
Yakuda said:
Ok so? What should I do? Drive over to DC and tell trump to knock it off? You should have put up a better candidate for president and you could have continued to flood the country with millions of illegals but you failed.
Click to expand...
I am simply asking if you agree with our Administration that this is acceptable Government action?

You wont admit it? Figured.
 
Jarod said:
October 25, 2025


Click to expand...
Keep weeping. What's the point. Lots of shit happens I don't like. This is happening and you don't like it so now what?
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top