Entering your home without a warrant.

Jarod said:
ICE claims the right to enter your home without a warrant.
Click to expand...

Start with a lie.

Jarod said:
Historically and very long established caselaw says the only time the GOVERNMENT has that right is if they are in hot pursuit if a dangerous felon.



Do you Trumppers agree with ICE, that they can simply enter homes without a warrant? Is this not the type of shit we quit England over? What about the 4th Amendment?

Are you libertarians upset? @Damocles
Click to expand...

We just recognize that you are lying - as always.
 
Yakuda said:
How many times has ICE entered a home without a warrant?
Click to expand...
All the times they were invited in.

Jeri is an insurrectionist and a fake lawyer. Jeri lies about everything.

If a law enforcement officer asked "May I come in," and the resident says "yes," then no warrant is needed.
 
Jarod said:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." United States Constitution, 4th Amendment.
Click to expand...

And?
 
Damocles said:
I am telling you that none of the examples you gave argued that they entered the home uninvited. Only one of them actually argued that there was no warrant for arrest and he was set free.

I am interested to find out what their arguments are, but so far what you've provided do not argue anything about entering homes without warrants. I do not know if they have, based on the filed suits that you provided there is no evidence that they have entered a single house without a warrant as they do not even mention that.
Click to expand...
They are all cases where ICE could not prove lawful detention authority. This is a lot of such cases in a short period of time, showing a pattern of violating constitutional protections on government activity.

My PACER is down currently, there might be more info available when I can get in.
 
Jarod said:
They are all cases where ICE could not prove lawful detention authority. This is a lot of such cases in a short period of time, showing a pattern of violating constitutional protections on government activity.

My PACER is down currently, there might be more info available when I can get in.
Click to expand...
However not even one of them claimed entry into a home. And 3 of those cases they were granted at least partial habeas.

You are again just repeating nonsense that does not support your OP, if you brought this crap to court they might hold you in contempt for assuming their stupidity. I get that you don't think laymen will check the BS you post, but when someone does and they call you out on it stop doubling down...

Give me cases where they went into people's houses without a warrant, put up or shut up.
 
Damocles said:
However not even one of them claimed entry into a home. And 3 of those cases they were granted at least partial habeas.

You are again just repeating nonsense that does not support your OP, if you brought this crap to court they might hold you in contempt for assuming their stupidity. I get that you don't think laymen will check the BS you post, but when someone does and they call you out on it stop doubling down...

Give me cases where they went into people's houses without a warrant, put up or shut up.
Click to expand...
Do you know that for sure?
 
Damocles said:
I looked up the cases, read what was ruled on and what they filed as arguments. So, yes. I am sure.
Click to expand...
Ok, I might have made a mistake... I was asked to provide examples, that list of cases was only one of the examples I provided.

Its clear they are entering homes in violation of the 4th, my point stands.




www.pbs.org

A U.S. citizen says ICE forced open the door to his Minnesota home and removed him in his underwear after a warrantless search

The Department of Homeland Security says the operation targeted two sex offenders, but Thao disputes this, saying he lives with his family, none of whom are listed as offenders.
www.pbs.org www.pbs.org
 
Damocles said:
However not even one of them claimed entry into a home. And 3 of those cases they were granted at least partial habeas.

You are again just repeating nonsense that does not support your OP, if you brought this crap to court they might hold you in contempt for assuming their stupidity. I get that you don't think laymen will check the BS you post, but when someone does and they call you out on it stop doubling down...

Give me cases where they went into people's houses without a warrant, put up or shut up.
Click to expand...
Gibson v. Bondi, No. 0:2026cv00172 (D. Minn. Jan. 15, 2026)
 
Damocles said:
However not even one of them claimed entry into a home. And 3 of those cases they were granted at least partial habeas.

You are again just repeating nonsense that does not support your OP, if you brought this crap to court they might hold you in contempt for assuming their stupidity. I get that you don't think laymen will check the BS you post, but when someone does and they call you out on it stop doubling down...

Give me cases where they went into people's houses without a warrant, put up or shut up.
Click to expand...

Chicago South Shore Apartments - September 30, 2025​

Evidence:
  • Black Hawk helicopter deployed
  • Snipers on roof
  • 37 people arrested
  • Multiple wrong apartments entered
  • Doors destroyed, apartments ransacked
  • Photos of destruction published
  • Blood stains and zip ties photographed
  • ProPublica investigation found no criminal charges filed
  • Constitutional law professor called it "one of the most unconstitutional things the federal government has ever done"
Sources:
  • Chicago Tribune, WBEZ, Block Club Chicago (extensive photo documentation)
  • ProPublica investigation
  • CNN coverage
AI found this one for me.
 
Damocles said:
However not even one of them claimed entry into a home. And 3 of those cases they were granted at least partial habeas.

You are again just repeating nonsense that does not support your OP, if you brought this crap to court they might hold you in contempt for assuming their stupidity. I get that you don't think laymen will check the BS you post, but when someone does and they call you out on it stop doubling down...

Give me cases where they went into people's houses without a warrant, put up or shut up.
Click to expand...
There is even an ICE memo saying the practice is Constitutional.
 
Jarod said:

Chicago South Shore Apartments - September 30, 2025​

Evidence:
  • Black Hawk helicopter deployed
  • Snipers on roof
  • 37 people arrested
  • Multiple wrong apartments entered
  • Doors destroyed, apartments ransacked
  • Photos of destruction published
  • Blood stains and zip ties photographed
  • ProPublica investigation found no criminal charges filed
  • Constitutional law professor called it "one of the most unconstitutional things the federal government has ever done"
Sources:
  • Chicago Tribune, WBEZ, Block Club Chicago (extensive photo documentation)
  • ProPublica investigation
  • CNN coverage
AI found this one for me.
Click to expand...
Thanks. Now I can read what was going on. Sounds "exciting" which is something you don't want on police action. Wrong entries, etc. I will read up and get back to you on what I see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top