Excellent op-ed on O'Donnell/Coons debate

Mott the Hoople said:
I think she's a nice lady. She reminds me a lot of W. A very nice person who is dangerously underqualified to hold high office. LOL
Click to expand...

Gotta put a much higher premium on "qualified" for the office of Prez. That's one where you don't really have 99 other people to check you on bad decisions. We have some pretty dumb people in both the Senate & House as it is; it's just not nearly as dangerous....
 
ZappasGuitar said:
Hell, ANYTIME Ice Dancer posts something someone could call bullshit.
Click to expand...

And lord knows you would know bullshit, Bossy, but why don't you steer us in the right direction, Oh Great Wise Rotund One.


fat.JPG
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Yea gods did you watch that debate with partisan blinders on? O'Donnell came off like a blythering idiot on the Creationism/First Ammendment discussion. I mean the audience literally laughed at her answers. She managed to show a profound ignorance of both science and law all at the same time. It was breath taking in her scope of ignorance. I about heaved a lung laughing. I can't ever recall someone embarrasing them selves in a public format as badly as O'Donnell did herself. Looks like Repubs snatched defeat from the jaws of victory on this one! LOL LOL LOL
Click to expand...

Yurt said:
give me some examples.....because i know you never view anything with partisan blinders on :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

.
 
Yurt said:
give me some examples.....because i know you never view anything with partisan blinders on :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Well I think the fact that she was literally asking if the phrase "Seperation of Church and State" was present in the first amendment when anyone who took 6th grade civics knows that this principle is derived from the first ammendment would be a good example. Her comment to Coons that because he does not support teaching alternative theories of Creationism and/or Intelligent Design Creationism in public school indicates he supports big government mandates is not only clueless but is a good example that she doesn't understand what a scientific theory is as creationism and/or intelligent design creationism are in no way, shape or form scientific theories let alone alternative theories to biological evolution.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Well I think the fact that she was literally asking if the phrase "Seperation of Church and State" was present in the first amendment when anyone who took 6th grade civics knows that this principle is derived from the first ammendment would be a good example.
Click to expand...
Except "separation of church in state" is not in there; it's a leftist's interpretation that you lib-tards take as gospel.
 
Dixie said:
Wow, you don't see Mott agreeing with Karl Rove everyday! :good4u:
Click to expand...
LOL Well if Rove did say that about the Delaware Senate race then we do indeed agree. LOL I mean the only thing I can think of to explain O'Donnell is that to many Delaware republicans went to work that day and forgot to vote.
 
Ice Dancer said:
And as usual Zapp does what he does BEST!!!!
Click to expand...

That's right!!

I show everyone on these boards what total horseshit your every post is!

A job I would not enjoy were it not totally impossible for you to be honest when talking politics.

btw...we're still waiting on a link to where you got the info that O'Donnell is only 6 points down...you planning on coming through with that info anytime soon?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top