Into the Night
Verified User
Random words. No apparent coherency.you're a pretentious moron with nothing to say.
morality is simple. evil people cloud the issue so they can be evil, especially war hawk Masonic libertarian traitors to humanity.
Random words. No apparent coherency.you're a pretentious moron with nothing to say.
morality is simple. evil people cloud the issue so they can be evil, especially war hawk Masonic libertarian traitors to humanity.
There is no such thing as a 'moral relativist'!
Just as I predicted. This militant atheist wants to holler that there is no objective morality, but then she get offended at having to defend and justify moral relativism.Wrong. It is a subjective term.Morality is either objective, or it's subjective.
That's right, Sybil...yet you claim it somehow is.There is no such thing as being a little pregnant, or morality being partly objective.
1+2=3 is right. 1+2=4 is wrong.You want to claim on the one hand there is no objective absolute right and wrong,
Atheism doesn't claim a 'morality' at all per se. It claims NOTHING.but neither do you want to own up to the consequences of atheism: that morality is relative and subjective.
They are not atheists.At least the great atheist intellectuals Camus and Sartre had the integrity to own the consequences of atheism: moral subjectivity.
You didn't predict anything!Just as I predicted.

I am not an atheist.This militant atheist. There is no such thing as a 'militant atheist'.
There is no such thing as an 'objective morality'. Morality is a subjective term. You are bullshitting again.wants to holler that there is no objective morality,
There is no such thing as 'moral relativism'. You are bullshitting again.but then she get offended at having to defend and justify moral relativism.
I'm not. YOU ARE.You can't tap dance around trying to avoid both.
There is no such thing as an 'objective morality'.
Morality is a subjective term.
"Moral Relativity" = "Moral Subjectivity" for everyone who isn't lame enough to play word games we know.Random words. No apparent coherency.
Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot. More than 52 million combined under their reigns of terror were scared to death of atheism.Seems that when people (even on JPP) have something more akin to fear of atheists than simple dislike.
There are posters on here who are, by their own admission, not necessarily dedicated to any faith but find atheism to be something worse than anything they can imagine. They can be accepting of all religions but when atheists show up they are compared to Stalin and Pol Pot.
Studies show repeatedly that atheists are among the least trusted people in American society. It's an interesting effect to realize that people are so irrational about their beliefs that the mere existence of someone who doesn't believe as they do causes undue consternation and anger. Just for existing and saying "Yeah, I don't think that I believe that".
But the weirdest part is the apparent FEAR people have of atheists. It's almost more of a knee-jerk reaction than a thought out position. Especially when one can justify the abject horrors many religions have unleashed on the world.
Strange.
There is no such thing as 'moral relativity'. There is no such thing as 'moral subjectivity'. Your word games won't work, Sybil. Morality is simply a subjective term. It's obvious you don't know what 'subjective' or 'objective' mean. You can't cover your illiteracy and bullshit with word games."Moral Relativity" = "Moral Subjectivity" for everyone who isn't lame enough to play word games
![]()
You think there is more than one of you, NoName??we know.
you have chosen evil.
im speaking for the group.You think there is more than one of you, NoName??
yes there is such a thing as objective morality.You didn't predict anything!
I am not an atheist.
There is no such thing as an 'objective morality'. Morality is a subjective term. You are bullshitting again.
There is no such thing as 'moral relativism'. You are bullshitting again.
I'm not. YOU ARE.
The precise definition of a Milquetoast Macaw post.Random words. No apparent coherency.
There is only one of you.im speaking for the group.
I do speak for the group.You don't get to speak for anybody but yourself, NoName. Omniscience fallacy.
There is no such thing as 'objective morality'. There is nothing to discuss. Buzzwords don't need discussion.yes there is such a thing as objective morality.
we can discuss it if you care.
LIFThe precise definition of a Milquetoast Macaw post.
Excellent self-examination, Milky.
You are not a group.I do speak for the group.
yes there is such a thing as objective morality.There is no such thing as 'objective morality'. There is nothing to discuss. Buzzwords don't need discussion.
I speak FOR the group.You are not a group.
Illiteracy: Use of plural for singular.
Organized Religion, has the added thing of having a building and the expense that goes with thatBut aren't ALL religions just built out of someone's personal experience with God?
Isn't that how all religions started? How could their personal relationship with God be so flawed if more than one person shares it?