Feminism

Will hugely hyper-hypocritical @christiefan915 show sisterly solidarity with this wonderful-looking woman on International Women's' Day?


Gli5BE0WoAAu4vc
 
Diogenes said:
Will hugely hyper-hypocritical @christiefan915 show sisterly solidarity with this wonderful-looking woman on International Women's' Day?


Gli5BE0WoAAu4vc
Click to expand...
Will amorally-hypocritical Leggiecrite tell me who she is, what she's done, and why I should show anything at all towards her?

"Yes, amoral people can be hypocrites, but the concept applies to them a bit differently than it does to moral people. Hypocrisy, at its core, is about inconsistency—saying one thing while doing another. For moral people, this usually involves preaching virtues they don’t practice, like a politician condemning corruption while taking bribes. The sting of hypocrisy comes from the betrayal of stated moral principles.

Amoral people, though, don’t operate with a moral compass—they don’t inherently care about right or wrong. But they can still be hypocrites if they project a persona or make claims they don’t follow through on, even if those claims aren’t tied to morality. For example, an amoral person might publicly swear off violence to seem pragmatic or likable, then turn around and stab someone in the back (literally or figuratively). The hypocrisy isn’t about violating a moral code—it’s about the mismatch between their words and actions.

Think of a sociopath who charms people by pretending to care about their feelings, only to manipulate them without remorse. They’re not breaking their own moral rules (they don’t have any), but they’re still two-faced. So, yes, amorality doesn’t immunize anyone from hypocrisy—it just shifts the arena from ethics to consistency."

Grok
 
christiefan915 said:
Will amorally-hypocritical Leggiecrite tell me who she is, what she's done, and why I should show anything at all towards her?

"Yes, amoral people can be hypocrites, but the concept applies to them a bit differently than it does to moral people. Hypocrisy, at its core, is about inconsistency—saying one thing while doing another. For moral people, this usually involves preaching virtues they don’t practice, like a politician condemning corruption while taking bribes. The sting of hypocrisy comes from the betrayal of stated moral principles.

Amoral people, though, don’t operate with a moral compass—they don’t inherently care about right or wrong. But they can still be hypocrites if they project a persona or make claims they don’t follow through on, even if those claims aren’t tied to morality. For example, an amoral person might publicly swear off violence to seem pragmatic or likable, then turn around and stab someone in the back (literally or figuratively). The hypocrisy isn’t about violating a moral code—it’s about the mismatch between their words and actions.

Think of a sociopath who charms people by pretending to care about their feelings, only to manipulate them without remorse. They’re not breaking their own moral rules (they don’t have any), but they’re still two-faced. So, yes, amorality doesn’t immunize anyone from hypocrisy—it just shifts the arena from ethics to consistency."

Grok
Click to expand...


It appears that hugely hyper-hypocritical @christiefan915 will not show sisterly solidarity with this wonderful-looking woman on International Women's' Day. :nodyes:
 
Diogenes said:
Your stubborn refusal to affirm sisterly solidarity with a wonderful-looking woman on International Women's' Day speaks for itself.


:nodyes:
Click to expand...
Your crazy insistence that I express sisterly solidarity with a random stranger based on her looks, rather than a worthy woman with intellectual firepower, speaks volumes about your shallowness. :burn:
 
Diogenes said:
Will hugely hyper-hypocritical @christiefan915 show sisterly solidarity with this wonderful-looking woman on International Women's' Day?













GlhAFliasAAB-Nq
Click to expand...
"In October 2024, [Maye] Musk made a post on X recommending Republican voters should commit fraud during the 2024 United States presidential election, by voting under false names multiple times, purporting that Democrats were already doing so using "illegals". She gave no evidence that "illegals" are voting. Musk was cautioned by lawyers that her post constituted a criminal act, and that she could be legally prosecuted for criminal conspiracy, if anyone followed her recommendation. She then said readers should "ignore" the post."

1741470452526.png
 
christiefan915 said:
"In October 2024, [Maye] Musk made a post on X recommending Republican voters should commit fraud during the 2024 United States presidential election, by voting under false names multiple times, purporting that Democrats were already doing so using "illegals". She gave no evidence that "illegals" are voting. Musk was cautioned by lawyers that her post constituted a criminal act, and that she could be legally prosecuted for criminal conspiracy, if anyone followed her recommendation. She then said readers should "ignore" the post."
Click to expand...


Irrelevant. She is still a woman.

It appears obvious that hugely hyper-hypocritical @christiefan915 will not show sisterly solidarity with two wonderful-looking woman on International Women's' Day, so far.
 
christiefan915 said:
You would show solidarity with Amy Coney Barrett and ignore it with Sonia Sotomayor, hypo-cribbit.
Click to expand...


What I would or wouldn't do is irrelevant.

I am perforce unable to show sisterly solidarity with women. :pke:

Let the record show that Christiecrite will eagerly employ any mendacious mechanism to avoid responsibility for her failure as a feminist female to show sisterly solidarity with women she disagrees with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top