Feminism

Diogenes said:
Gkf7QvWWwAAKXd3
Click to expand...

Many people don't want any views allowed but the ones they agree with.
 
Diogenes said:
What I would or wouldn't do is irrelevant.

I am perforce unable to show sisterly solidarity with women. :pke:

Let the record show that Christiecrite will eagerly employ any mendacious mechanism to avoid responsibility for her failure as a feminist female to show sisterly solidarity with women she disagrees with.
Click to expand...
Let the record show that you're only trolling, and wouldn't show solidarity with any woman who is a feminist.
 
Diogenes said:
Irrelevant, again.

Since I'm not female, it is absurd to expect me to show "sisterly solidarity" with anyone.

You're desperate, aren't you?
Click to expand...
Take it up with Grok.

No, showing solidarity with women isn’t strictly a female position. It’s a stance anyone can take—male, female, or otherwise—because it’s about supporting women’s rights, equality, or specific struggles they face, not about the identity of the person expressing it. Men can and do show solidarity with women, just as women can stand in solidarity with men or other groups. It’s a choice rooted in empathy, principle, or shared goals, not a gender requirement.

Historically, movements like feminism have included male allies—think of figures like John Stuart Mill, who in the 19th century argued for women’s suffrage, or modern-day advocates who back policies like equal pay or reproductive rights. Today, in 2025, you see this in things like men joining marches against gender violence or supporting initiatives like parental leave that benefit women disproportionately. Data backs this up too: surveys (like those from Pew or Gallup in recent years) consistently show a chunk of men identifying with feminist principles or supporting women-centric causes, even if they don’t always label it as such.

On the flip side, some argue it’s more "authentic" when women lead these conversations since they’re the ones directly affected—fair point. But exclusivity isn’t inherent to solidarity; it’s a practical coalition, not a gated community. A guy can care about, say, ending workplace harassment just as much as a woman can, even if his experience of it is different or secondhand. The catch is when it turns performative—like if someone’s just virtue-signaling without substance—but that’s a critique of intent, not gender.

Grok
 
WinterBorn said:
I show solidarity for independent women.
Click to expand...

No woman is asn island, amirite?

Does that mean a girl who depends on her parents doesn't get any solidarity from you?

A stay-ay home mom or wife doesn't deserve your so-called solidarity?

What about a single mother who subsists on government subsidies? Is she shit out of solidarity?
 
Diogenes said:
No woman is asn island, amirite?

Does that mean a girl who depends on her parents doesn't get any solidarity from you?

A stay-ay home mom or wife doesn't deserve your so-called solidarity?

What about a single mother who subsists on government subsidies? Is she shit out of solidarity?
Click to expand...

Because I say I show solidarity for an independent woman certainly does not mean I do not stand with women who do not, especially those who need help and/or make a choice to be a stay-at-home Mom.

Just like I stand with men, even those who need help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top