Flipping The Right's Falsity: AOC Really Was In Danger During The Insurrection

Nordberg said:
If they caught AOC she would have been killed. She was in the capitol complex. Rightys know more about her fears and feelings than she does. She was justifiably terrified.
Click to expand...

AOC claimed she was in the Capitol building. No one was killed except the poor women trying to stop Antifa and BLM from smashing windows.
 
Hello Darth,

Darth Omar said:
I’m easily old enough to have learned to be cynical. We’ll leave it at that.
Click to expand...

I don't recall AOC ever calling it an "unarmed insurrection."

That term has come about since FOX news began downplaying the severity of the insurrection.

And now I see you've taken the position that it has not been proven anybody had any firearms, so you're calling it what you're calling it.

I seriously doubt that term would even be used if it had been Democrats who attacked the capitol after a Democratic president refused to believe the reality that he lost his reelection bid and promoted domestic terrorism in an attempt to further a 'big lie' that the election was somehow 'stolen' despite having no evidence of it.

But, of course, Democrats have never done such a thing, and it is highly unlikely they ever would.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello Darth,



I don't recall AOC ever calling it an "unarmed insurrection."

That term has come about since FOX news began downplaying the severity of the insurrection.

And now I see you've taken the position that it has not been proven anybody had any firearms, so you're calling it what you're calling it.

I seriously doubt that term would even be used if it had been Democrats who attacked the capitol after a Democratic president refused to believe the reality that he lost his reelection bid and promoted domestic terrorism in an attempt to further a 'big lie' that the election was somehow 'stolen' despite having no evidence of it.

But, of course, Democrats have never done such a thing, and it is highly unlikely they ever would.
Click to expand...

The term ‘unarmed insurrection’ is derived from the *fact* the rioters carried no weapons into the Capitol—according to court documents.

Which immediately calls into question the insurrection narrative. If they intended to do an insurrection—it was a suicide mission and doomed to fail.

So much of the media narrative has proven untrue it’s fair to call it a hoax at this point. The narrative is a hoax. Not 1/6–it was basically a riot and nothing more.
 
Hello Darth,

Darth Omar said:
The term ‘unarmed insurrection’ is derived from the *fact* the rioters carried no weapons into the Capitol—according to court documents.

Which immediately calls into question the insurrection narrative. If they intended to do an insurrection—it was a suicide mission and doomed to fail.

So much of the media narrative has proven untrue it’s fair to call it a hoax at this point. The narrative is a hoax. Not 1/6–it was basically a riot and nothing more.
Click to expand...

Well at least you are admitting it was a Republican riot that ransacked the capitol and resulted in death.

I am unaware of any rules which require an insurrection to be successful in order for the term to be used.

Doomed to fail? Perhaps so, if they couldn't prevail in their intended purpose despite a minimally guarded objective. Nobody has claimed the people who went berserk that day were the sharpest tacks in the box.

I do not agree that any damage and killing people can do without firearms is OK, as long as they did not carry firearms, a point which has yet to be established, nor is it a hoax. But I'm sure it helps the Trump-can-do-no-wrong narrative.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top